LOL Why don't you start a new poll thread Fail asking specifically if your delusions linking them to me (OMG what does that even mean?!) are what is keeping them from posting. I await the results...
Playing dumb didn't work so well for them either.
LOL, yes, I'm sure they're quaking in fear of posting for fear of Fail comparing them to the evil chucky2! LOL
It's ok to give yourself a little credit.
Issue has made its way onto HBO, will be covered by the Vice documentary series. Doubt they will fully cover the causes, HBO leans too far left for that.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...tate-sjws-get-their-very-own-vice-documentary
just another window into the madness of that campus.
Issue has made its way onto HBO, will be covered by the Vice documentary series. Doubt they will fully cover the causes, HBO leans too far left for that.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...tate-sjws-get-their-very-own-vice-documentary
just another window into the madness of that campus.
I saw the Vice report pretty informative
Definition of proposal
- 1 : an act of putting forward or stating something for consideration
Of course the student did what they could to win politically by turning the screws on him, just as Weinstein is doing what he could by pretending to be some innocent victim to the conservative media so they can successfully push that narrative.
At that point it ceased to be a proposal. Lets call it was it was, a demand.
The story contains an inaccuracy. The professor complained about an impending change to the "Day of Absence," from the normal practice of students (and professors, presumably) of color voluntarily absenting themselves from campus and holding off-campus meetings, to white people being barred from campus for the day. That was the critical difference that sparked the professor's protest in the first place.An update on this one:
Weinstein and his wife (a professor of anthropology at Evergreen) sued the school for failing to protect them from angry student protesters. The school just settled with them for $500K.
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/tick...or-who-criticized-handling-of-protests/120110
The two of them also resigned.
The story contains an inaccuracy. The professor complained about an impending change to the "Day of Absence," from the normal practice of students (and professors, presumably) of color voluntarily absenting themselves from campus and holding off-campus meetings, to white people being barred from campus for the day. That was the critical difference that sparked the professor's protest in the first place.
I appreciate the correction. The problem is that even the act of questioning the change was met by violent protests, so while I believe you are technically correct about the Day of Absence, the intimidation and threats of violence amounted to a clear de facto statement that the presence of a particular ethnicity would not be tolerated on campus on that day.And you point out an "inaccuracy" by posting another inaccuracy. Nobody was being barred from campus. The only difference is that instead of minority folks voluntarily leaving the campus for the event, white folks were invited to participate by voluntarily leaving the campus for the day.
Nice try though.
And you point out an "inaccuracy" by posting another inaccuracy. Nobody was being barred from campus. The only difference is that instead of minority folks voluntarily leaving the campus for the event, white folks were invited to participate by voluntarily leaving the campus for the day.
Nice try though.
I appreciate the correction. The problem is that even the act of questioning the change was met by violent protests, so while I believe you are technically correct about the Day of Absence, the intimidation and threats of violence amounted to a clear de facto statement that the presence of a particular ethnicity would not be tolerated on campus on that day.
And hey, "nice try," really? I'm not intending to spread misinformation. At least give me credit for being half right, and try not to be overly prejudiced in your evaluation of my intentions.
It all depends what you mean by "barring" people from campus. No one has said the school was going to expel any white student they found on campus. But what happens at a progressive school when white students are asked to absent themselves but some of them refuse to do so? How would you expect those students to be treated? Just look what happened to Weinstein for merely objecting to this arrangement. Anyone disagreeing with the party line at Evergreen was reflexively labeled a racist.
Yeah. It's one of those 'it would be a shame if something were to happen to you" moments that people on the side of the students would claim would never happen - but every rational person knows there's an unspoken threat.
One of these days one of these students will end up as president of the United States and then you'll really be in trouble.
They're going to have to learn to tie their shoes first without blaming someone else for their difficulties. It might be a while.
They're going to have to learn to tie their shoes first without blaming someone else for their difficulties. It might be a while.