I purchased an eVGA GTX260 Superclocked card back in August. The specs are as follows:
Core clock 602MHz
Stream Processors 192 processing cores
Memory Clock 2052MHz
Memory Size 896MB
Memory Interface 448-bit
and now I see that eVGA has the "core 216" which offers the following specs:
Core clock 576MHz
Stream Processors 216 processing cores
Memory Clock 1998MHz
Memory Size 896MB
Memory Interface 448-bit
Now I know clock for clock, a GTX260 Core 216 with 216 stream processors VS a stock GTX260 w/192 stream processors will be a better performer but mine is a factory "superclocked" version and I am asking for opinions on whether I should go for the "step up" from eVGA. The cost would be rather minimal (~$35). Would the performance be enough to justify the "step up"?
Core clock 602MHz
Stream Processors 192 processing cores
Memory Clock 2052MHz
Memory Size 896MB
Memory Interface 448-bit
and now I see that eVGA has the "core 216" which offers the following specs:
Core clock 576MHz
Stream Processors 216 processing cores
Memory Clock 1998MHz
Memory Size 896MB
Memory Interface 448-bit
Now I know clock for clock, a GTX260 Core 216 with 216 stream processors VS a stock GTX260 w/192 stream processors will be a better performer but mine is a factory "superclocked" version and I am asking for opinions on whether I should go for the "step up" from eVGA. The cost would be rather minimal (~$35). Would the performance be enough to justify the "step up"?