Evidence suggesting Hillary comitted election fraud ["Alleged"]

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
4,000
2
0
Yeah, her team is so smart they left tags identifying themselves?

This has all the hallmark indicators of political dirty tricks the Republicans are unrivaled at. Say, has anyone seen E. Howard Hunt or G. Gordon Liddy recently? What about Col. North?

Virge -- you're an idiot if you think Hillary's team was behind this. Nixon had a team of lawyers that fabricated stuff using opposition stationary -- they called the practice "Ratfucking". This smells of that tactic...

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a25090/donald-segretti-ratfking-100413/

http://www.correntewire.com/ratfucking_a_gop_tradition


Brian
 
Last edited:

BxgJ

Golden Member
Jul 27, 2015
1,054
123
106
At work, link won't work here. Maybe if I put my tin foil hat on......
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
Yeah, her team is so smart they left tags identifying themselves?

This has all the hallmark indicators of political dirty tricks the Republicans are unrivaled at. Say, has anyone seen H. Howard Hunt or G. Gordon Liddy recently? What about Col. North?

Virge -- you're an idiot if you think Hillary's team was behind this. Nixon had a team of lawyers that fabricated stuff using opposition stationary -- they called the practice "Ratfucking". This smells of that tactic...

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a25090/donald-segretti-ratfking-100413/

http://www.correntewire.com/ratfucking_a_gop_tradition


Brian


meh I have my doubts on the story but the excuse of saying if they are so smart why did they leave tags is rather silly. Very smart people tend to do some very dumb things.

it's something to keep an eye on but i don't expect much more then then the GOP going nuts on it.

though IF true its rather bad.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Yawn, more innuendo. Wake me up when you have something. I gotta catch up on by Ben-gha-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzis
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,001
113
106
Ugh, another attempt to drum up "controversy" surrounding Hillary Clinton. I've said it before and I'll say it again: I've witnessed this charade play out over my entire adult life and a significant part of my childhood. Since 1993, the Republicans have thrown accusation after baseless accusation against her just to see what sticks. They've cried wolf far too many times for me to count. From "Hillarycare" jabs, to whitewater, to the Lewinsky scandal, to scare tactics of "First Husband" Bill in a dress, to Bhengazi, to the email scandal....you just can't take any of it seriously anymore. This is just icing on the cake.
 

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
4,000
2
0
meh I have my doubts on the story but the excuse of saying if they are so smart why did they leave tags is rather silly. Very smart people tend to do some very dumb things.

it's something to keep an eye on but i don't expect much more then then the GOP going nuts on it.

though IF true its rather bad.

The practice and practitioners of ratfucking never went away. One of Donald Segretti's guys was a young Karl Rove and he's still in the business. What the creeps from the CREP did was steal stationary from the Democrats then create false stories on that stationary. The goal was to weaken the most likely nominee and the tactic has been very successful.

The parallels to that practice is pretty clear to me and includes: use of identifying labels to pin blame on Hillary's team, scurrilous to the point of juvenile wording, attacks on more than one Dem at the same time.

So, I'd love to see this investigated to see if it can be determined how easy it would be for an outsider to cook something like this up.

If you ask me, the real story in the Watergate story wasn't the break in itself, but in the reason they broke in. They were looking for information they could use with there dirty tricks campaign and if they could get some embarrassing info at the Watergate and then embellished that with additional lies they could harm whomever they felt was the biggest threat in the election. What Segretti and other were doing was subverting the election process and it would be interesting to know if this story was yet another case of the Repubs continuing to be ... ratfuckers!


Brian
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
Ahh, yes. Typical response from the indoctrinated. I've corrected the title to satiate your lower IQ.

You are right. I need Glenn Beck to get out his white board and break it down for me.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,513
4,607
136
Yeah, her team is so smart they left tags identifying themselves?

This has all the hallmark indicators of political dirty tricks the Republicans are unrivaled at. Say, has anyone seen E. Howard Hunt or G. Gordon Liddy recently? What about Col. North?

Virge -- you're an idiot if you think Hillary's team was behind this. Nixon had a team of lawyers that fabricated stuff using opposition stationary -- they called the practice "Ratfucking". This smells of that tactic...

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a25090/donald-segretti-ratfking-100413/

http://www.correntewire.com/ratfucking_a_gop_tradition


Brian

The practice and practitioners of ratfucking never went away. One of Donald Segretti's guys was a young Karl Rove and he's still in the business. What the creeps from the CREP did was steal stationary from the Democrats then create false stories on that stationary. The goal was to weaken the most likely nominee and the tactic has been very successful.

The parallels to that practice is pretty clear to me and includes: use of identifying labels to pin blame on Hillary's team, scurrilous to the point of juvenile wording, attacks on more than one Dem at the same time.

So, I'd love to see this investigated to see if it can be determined how easy it would be for an outsider to cook something like this up.

If you ask me, the real story in the Watergate story wasn't the break in itself, but in the reason they broke in. They were looking for information they could use with there dirty tricks campaign and if they could get some embarrassing info at the Watergate and then embellished that with additional lies they could harm whomever they felt was the biggest threat in the election. What Segretti and other were doing was subverting the election process and it would be interesting to know if this story was yet another case of the Repubs continuing to be ... ratfuckers!


Brian


Oh we should have known the Republicans are behind it. Wow how did I not see this?

That is just stupid.
 
Last edited:

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,493
3,159
136
HAHA.
Yeah, election fraud would be any woman daring to run for a mans job.
I get it. We all get it. Enough post.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
You are right. I need Glenn Beck to get out his white board and break it down for me.

Right wing conspiracy theorists crave the aroma of a nice fresh steamer. They all lose their pungency as they age & dry out- Birtherism, Fast & Furious, IRS scandal, Benghazi, & Hillary's email have all lost that special something that only a fresh one can provide.

They're desperate.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |