- Jul 11, 2001
- 37,833
- 8,302
- 136
After the latest round of rulings by this sham of a SCOTUS, I wouldn't count on them ruling appropriately.Well there is always the slim possibility that the Supreme Court does us an unfathomable favor tomorrow in the name of executive power.
Not sure our current President is able to wield a weapon, in the case of Presidential immunity. Sure would be useful though.Well there is always the slim possibility that the Supreme Court does us an unfathomable favor tomorrow in the name of executive power.
Supreme insanity. I mean "obstruction of justice" isn't just about paperwork so why would "disrupt an official proceeding" be any different?Good luck with that, do it again and no charges if you don’t touch any paperwork
Justices rule for Jan. 6 defendant - SCOTUSblog
This article was updated on June 28 at 4:22 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday threw out the charges against a former Pennsylvania police officer who entered the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks. By a vote of 6-3, the justices ruled that the law that Joseph Fischer was charged with viowww.scotusblog.com
Supreme insanity. I mean "obstruction of justice" isn't just about paperwork so why would "disrupt an official proceeding" be any different?
It's not, it just seems more like feelings rulings again.
I mean, it could be bribery, but only if they were paid ahead of time and are a cartoonish villain twirling their handlebar mustache and leaving a note that said "I did it"