So you guys think all news organizations were speculating, or are pissed that they were reporting the speculations of others, like they do with EVERY CASE OF ANYTHING? Perhaps a statement similar to this: "officials are looking into the possibility of it being <insert name or group here>?"
Anyways, you guys seem to sound surprised that news will report the speculation of people that were there, or people in charge of investigations. When the majority of bombings in public areas occur by a specific subgroup of people, guess who will be on the suspect list?
NEWSFLASH: Newspapers report information provided to them by others, more at THE EXISTENCE OF THE FIRST REPORTER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
I didn't read any news stories at all that said the attacks were done by Muslims. I read Reuters and CNN. What did you read? Joe Schmoe's: This Is Not A Blog But News newspaper? I think the closed minded one is you, since you, apparently, interpret phrases like "reports are coming in," "officials are," "many have asked," or "authorities are" when talking about something as "we at <the news orginization> have proven the culprit is <the most likely fucking suspect(s) currently being looked at> without any proof because we exist to state facts we create without evidence, and do not merely relay information provided to us by others (with the exception of investigative reporting)."