It makes a touchdown/extra point more valuable then 2 field goals. If a team is up by 7 they can't tie with field goals, they need to get in the end zone.
It makes a touchdown/extra point more valuable then 2 field goals. If a team is up by 7 they can't tie with field goals, they need to get in the end zone.
Perhaps if a team can't make the 2 point conversion, they deserve to be tied with a pair of field goals.
The XFL tried eliminating the extra point kick and forcing teams to run a play to score the extra point, and the result was a measly 40% success rate
I guess you just don't understand the concept of choice in strategy.
The whole point of the 2-point conversion is the risk/reward of even trying it. The extra point being a near sure thing, you're better off taking it until you HAVE to go for 2 due to the score of the game.
Eliminating it and forcing teams to go for 2 would just turn the whole thing into a crap shoot
The extra point now is pretty much a freebie so yea I don't get what the strategy is with giving points away
Guess OP didn't see the Falcons-Chargers game yesterday.
because its either take the 99% extra point, or go with the 40-50% gamble, and it works because its not a free extra point, you still have to go through the paces and perform the play
if you force everyone to go for 2, its basically just a weighted coin flip to see if there's a 33% advantage netted to the score that just occurred...and that's just completely dumb, there's far more strategy to having the choice of what is basically a free point and less than 50% chance for 2.
heck, while we're at it, lets go back to pre-1906 rules and abolish the forward pass, that will even out the playing field even more! No more fooling the defense!
You might have had somewhat of an argument back when the NFL was playing without the 2 point conversion, but the better argument still would have been to add the 2 point conversion rather than eliminate the easy kick