JSt0rm
Lifer
- Sep 5, 2000
- 27,399
- 3,947
- 126
He's going to hire the best people to do the best vetting. It will be extreme and yuge.
They know exactly where she is. Witness protection program.Vs zero vetting of countless under Merkel Clinton
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/761665991210332160
The FBI can't even keep track of one woman who was a prime suspect under their watch.
So, just curious, do you guys not like vetting, or do you not like it because Trump is saying it?
Until we can do that, I agree that there needs to be a temporary pause.
So, just curious, do you guys not like vetting, or do you not like it because Trump is saying it? Would you like it better if Clinton was saying it?
Frankly, I don't care who says it, I don't want immigrants coming from terrorism hot spots without comprehensive, thorough vetting. Until we can do that, I agree that there needs to be a temporary pause. Look, I don't like Trump or Hillary, but this is an important issue.
What was also deeply disturbing in Trump's plan was the idea that he would set up commissions to "educate the public" on extremism, then be charged with "rooting it out.. viciously" if needed.
Wtf..
Otherwords, a propaganda campaign to polarize the public, followed up by "vicious" actions by the govt against its citizens found to be suspicious. Trials, imprisonment, executions??
Where is he going with this? McCarthy on 'roids?
I know your mommy and your teachers told you that you are one really bright individual, but... you're not. Your ignorance is of epic proportions and we can't afford to humor you any longer.
Why do the same people that have nothing but contempt for all things conservative so wholly support those that are the most conservative on the entire planet? Why are home grown conservatives here in the U.S. treated like red-headed step-children while radical Islamic extremists are put up on a pedestal? There's some interesting psychology to explore.
My question to you is why do you confuse my advocacy of our actual laws and support of those policies that are already working to prevent a problem that you seem to think exists, with some sort of notion that I am putting terrorists up on a pedestal?
I am not. I despise this kind of extremist, baby-killing poisonous islam horseshit. These are the worst kind of conservatives on the planet and I really would give no quarter for such individuals.
But you are simply creating a strawman over here in the corner because you can't point to a real problem with our policies that already prevent this type of immigration rather successfully.
But I guess you're also still waiting for wealth to trickle down. And WMDs to show up. And the real birth certificate. And real voter fraud. ....any kind of post evidence to support the already failed policy, right?
I don't want people here whose plan to kill me is to throw me into a vat of boiling tar. I also don't want people here that want to kill me by dissolving me in a nitric acid solution. Ditto for drowning me in a cage, burning me alive in a cage, cutting off my head and all the various other sadistic methods that radical followers of Islam have dreamed up in their brainstorming sessions. I'm also not interested in being a victim of
"workplace violence" by being shot by a radical Islamist shouting Allahu Akbar. Being killed or maimed by a pressure cooker bomb doesn't sound very appealing either.
Now, I fully understand that due to the nature of the beast, leftists want to wait until more of that actually starts occurring here. That they want to wait for the escalation beyond shootings, bombings and using a Ford F150 as a weapon. Then, after rationalizing the behavior and allowing it to continue for who know how much longer they will turn a blind eye while the grownups have to wade in to straighten up the situation. They'll then complain about the way it was done and the cost and who knows what else as is their pattern. That's how these things usually play out.
But I'd rather nip it in the bud. If that means we need to profile and do some vetting on people than that's what we need to do. Yeah, some feeling might get hurt. Some people might be transported out of their "safe spaces". The horror!
Sally Kohn tweeted today essentially that Sharia Law is progressive. This woman isn't informed or perhaps bright enough enough to understand that under Sharia Law she would be killed. She, along with everyone else that adheres to leftist ideology will be on the kill list. They don't like the way you think, they don't like the way you live your lives and they really don't like the way you run your mouths and no amount of "love" is going to change their minds. Time to face reality as tough as that may be.
I'm tired of listening to the "logic" spouted repeatedly by those that adhere to leftist ideology. I know your mommy and your teachers told you that you are one really bright individual, but... you're not. Your ignorance is of epic proportions and we can't afford to humor you any longer. Twenty trillion is bad, thirty trillion is worse.
Why do the same people that have nothing but contempt for all things conservative so wholly support those that are the most conservative on the entire planet? Why are home grown conservatives here in the U.S. treated like red-headed step-children while radical Islamic extremists are put up on a pedestal? There's some interesting psychology to explore.
My question to you is why do you confuse my advocacy of our actual laws and support of those policies that are already working to prevent a problem that you seem to think exists, with some sort of notion that I am putting terrorists up on a pedestal?
I am not. I despise this kind of extremist, baby-killing poisonous islam horseshit. These are the worst kind of conservatives on the planet and I really would give no quarter for such individuals.
But you are simply creating a strawman over here in the corner because you can't point to a real problem with our policies that already prevent this type of immigration rather successfully.
But I guess you're also still waiting for wealth to trickle down. And WMDs to show up. And the real birth certificate. And real voter fraud. ....any kind of post evidence to support the already failed policy, right?
He doesn't care about terrorism, because he won't say the magic words. It's really that simple. And you know what those magic words are.
What's truly comical is that you think you're one of the grownups.I don't want people here whose plan to kill me is to throw me into a vat of boiling tar. I also don't want people here that want to kill me by dissolving me in a nitric acid solution. Ditto for drowning me in a cage, burning me alive in a cage, cutting off my head and all the various other sadistic methods that radical followers of Islam have dreamed up in their brainstorming sessions. I'm also not interested in being a victim of
"workplace violence" by being shot by a radical Islamist shouting Allahu Akbar. Being killed or maimed by a pressure cooker bomb doesn't sound very appealing either.
Now, I fully understand that due to the nature of the beast, leftists want to wait until more of that actually starts occurring here. That they want to wait for the escalation beyond shootings, bombings and using a Ford F150 as a weapon. Then, after rationalizing the behavior and allowing it to continue for who know how much longer they will turn a blind eye while the grownups have to wade in to straighten up the situation. They'll then complain about the way it was done and the cost and who knows what else as is their pattern. That's how these things usually play out.
But I'd rather nip it in the bud. If that means we need to profile and do some vetting on people than that's what we need to do. Yeah, some feeling might get hurt. Some people might be transported out of their "safe spaces". The horror!
Sally Kohn tweeted today essentially that Sharia Law is progressive. This woman isn't informed or perhaps bright enough enough to understand that under Sharia Law she would be killed. She, along with everyone else that adheres to leftist ideology will be on the kill list. They don't like the way you think, they don't like the way you live your lives and they really don't like the way you run your mouths and no amount of "love" is going to change their minds. Time to face reality as tough as that may be.
I'm tired of listening to the "logic" spouted repeatedly by those that adhere to leftist ideology. I know your mommy and your teachers told you that you are one really bright individual, but... you're not. Your ignorance is of epic proportions and we can't afford to humor you any longer. Twenty trillion is bad, thirty trillion is worse.
Why do the same people that have nothing but contempt for all things conservative so wholly support those that are the most conservative on the entire planet? Why are home grown conservatives here in the U.S. treated like red-headed step-children while radical Islamic extremists are put up on a pedestal? There's some interesting psychology to explore.
So, just curious, do you guys not like vetting, or do you not like it because Trump is saying it? Would you like it better if Clinton was saying it?
Frankly, I don't care who says it, I don't want immigrants coming from terrorism hot spots without comprehensive, thorough vetting. Until we can do that, I agree that there needs to be a temporary pause. Look, I don't like Trump or Hillary, but this is an important issue.
I don't like regular vetting, but EXTREME vetting sounds awesome.
What's truly comical is that you think you're one of the grownups.
I'm confused by this entire topic. My job puts me in contact with many people who have immigrated to the states, and if the topic comes up they're always quick to say how long and thorough the process was. It can take years. And as far as I'm aware, immigrants are statistically less likely to commit crimes in the states than people born here. So what is the basis for thinking that we need to make vetting more "extreme"?
Stating the obvious (for "normal" people), of course not for Trump supporters: