Since there are no simple ways to benchmark systems running F@H, I started to calculate performance on different computers myself. I have 5 machines running: P2-300, P4 cel 1,5, P4 cel 1,7, P3-1000, XP 1800+@2200 MHz.
For these machines, I already have some numbers. But I need more data.
So if you are running F@H and wanna help, please post the following:
(For a list of workunits and credits: http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html )
Example:
Cpu-type: P3 tualatin
Cpu-speed: 1000 MHz
FSB: 4x100
Memory type/size: 256 MB
Mem speed/type: 100 MHz DDR
Dedicated: Yes
Benchmark: 3192
Workunit name: p639_L939_K12M_nat
Credits: 70,9
Optimization: None
Time used: 2,3122 days
Quote-formatting:
Cpu-type:
Cpu-speed:
FSB:
Memory size:
Memory speed:
Dedicated:
Benchmark:
Workunit name:
Credits:
Optimization:
Time used:
Added: Please report the optimizations used. SSE seems to be 15% faster than 3DNow on AMD machines.
Or if you want to help, but don't have time / are lazy, please e-mail me with the machine-information and your logfile(s) at kifaru (at) tkau (dot) nl.
Thanks in advance!
For these machines, I already have some numbers. But I need more data.
So if you are running F@H and wanna help, please post the following:
(For a list of workunits and credits: http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html )
Example:
Cpu-type: P3 tualatin
Cpu-speed: 1000 MHz
FSB: 4x100
Memory type/size: 256 MB
Mem speed/type: 100 MHz DDR
Dedicated: Yes
Benchmark: 3192
Workunit name: p639_L939_K12M_nat
Credits: 70,9
Optimization: None
Time used: 2,3122 days
Quote-formatting:
Cpu-type:
Cpu-speed:
FSB:
Memory size:
Memory speed:
Dedicated:
Benchmark:
Workunit name:
Credits:
Optimization:
Time used:
Added: Please report the optimizations used. SSE seems to be 15% faster than 3DNow on AMD machines.
Or if you want to help, but don't have time / are lazy, please e-mail me with the machine-information and your logfile(s) at kifaru (at) tkau (dot) nl.
Thanks in advance!