GodlessAstronomer
Lifer
- Oct 27, 2007
- 17,010
- 1
- 0
My face is quite lopsided actually, sirAnd you say that with a straight face.
My face is quite lopsided actually, sirAnd you say that with a straight face.
My face is quite lopsided actually, sir
Want civility, stop spamming people's work emails. And if you don't stop whining to the media when you are told to go F yourself. But then again asking Republicans to quit whining is like asking them to admit that trickle down economics doesn't work.
Her response wasn't approved by the university.
I don't find her actions the least bit intolerant, childish, unprofessional but nothing else.
How about a professor who tells spammers to fvck off? Fire her too?
Good luck with that. Fortunately she has tenure, and First Amendment rights.
You know who else didn't like Liberal Professors? Pol Pot!
Good thing you have these forums to vent your spleen. I'm sure if the tables were turned, if this was some Tea Bag supporting Academic telling progressives to fuck off you and your ilk would be saying it's no big deal and the Left Leaners would be howling that the Professor should be fired.
Oh, and this is probably why you're confused. You have it exactly backwards. Working at a Burger King you are more likely to be fired for such behavior. They have little invested in employees and have no reason to tolerate inappropriate behavior. In the professional world where qualifications are high and good people are expensive to replace, we tend to be more tolerant of employees' idiosyncrasies. You'll learn this once you move out of the fast food industry.
opportunistic outrage thread!
yay
You do realize that we're not talking about Burger King here right? Where you work, you can probably tell the manager to fuck off when he tells you to make more fries and not get fired, but at real companies they would fire you.
Just say the professor was out of line, its not that hard. She is supposed to be tolerant of others and lead by example.
Unlike Palin she has a PhD and should know better than to resort to emotion. It's not just unprofessional it's also damaging to the national discourse. And I'll assume from your evasion that you're a partisan hack. In which case you probably don't care about discourse anyway and prefer to have your side scream over the other side.
yes the prof was out of line. That goes without saying....
Just say the professor was out of line, its not that hard. She is supposed to be tolerant of others and lead by example.
Seriously, seek help. When you see yourself in a small sea of humans surrounded by zombies, it's time to put away sharp objects and take your meds as directed.Expect to be derided as fools when you take fake entertainment stuff from tv/radio seriously.
This is as pathetic as trekkies whining about people not giving a shit about whats happening to the klingons. Oh poor trekkies, you are such a special class. Piss off fanboys, join the real world when you are ready to be adults. And dont compare a con to someone born homosexual, cons make a choice to be sucked up into the fantasy-world of talk radio and rw media and quit using critical thinking.
Conservatives just cannot take personal responsibility that they live in a fantasyworld is their problem. Another aspect of USA being a nation of zombies, if its not pills or booze its televangelism or the conservative entertainment "movement". It's all a excuse for intellectual cowardice to wall yourselves off as "victims".
From working at Corporate American for 5+ years, I tell you are flat out wrong.
Umm, sweetie, it was the original spam that went to the entire university. Her reply was apparently a private message, i.e., she hit <Reply>, not <Reply to All>. It was the butt-hurt young Republican who chose to publicize this private e-mail (which is itself an ethical breech, though certainly a common one).I've had 20+ years of experience and mine differs from yours and Bowfingers. But as I said I've also worked for some world class organizations. Given these same circumstances, people would be fired at the companies I've worked for. I'm not talking about some engineer telling some low level manager 'Fuck you' - I'm talking about if someone in the company responded to a corporate endorsed email with 'FUCK OFF' which went to all the employees of the company and quite possibly the customers too and picked up by the media. You WOULD be fired. ...
Umm, sweetie, it was the original spam that went to the entire university. Her reply was apparently a private message, i.e., she hit <Reply>, not <Reply to All>. It was the butt-hurt young Republican who chose to publicize this private e-mail (which is itself an ethical breech, though certainly a common one).
Umm, sweetie, it was the original spam that went to the entire university. Her reply was apparently a private message, i.e., she hit <Reply>, not <Reply to All>. It was the butt-hurt young Republican who chose to publicize this private e-mail (which is itself an ethical breech, though certainly a common one).
Either way, she responded in an official matter using her university credentials and this is now public and exposed to everyone. It is kind of funny that you are suggesting that the person who exposed her bigotry is somehow unethical in their behavior. If I sent an email to my senator for example expressing my opinion and they responded with FUCK OFF REPUBLICANS it would be unethical of me to make that information public? LOL.
The left is butthurt by this because they true bigotry is being exposed. Unfortunately this woman isn't the exception, she's the NORM.
Read the thread troll. I've repeatedly said what she did was wrong.So in your eyes, the professor acted appropriately and did nothing wrong?
You do know that university profs aren't elected, right?
This board haunts me with its false comparisons.