Off you go then. Set up a messaging service. You seem to think that other services having 100s of millions more users isn't a problem. You should do well.
It isn't about a messaging service. The original point that was made is that the company's only real asset is its userbase, which was valued at $42 each. You seem to think that this is reasonable, but not only has every single successful tech company seen a similar explosion in its userbase, proving that new ideas will thrive despite their humble origins, but Facebook already HAS a huge userbase. They don't need to buy more users at some exorbitant price. Furthermore, Facebook already has a mobile app, and messaging. Maybe they're not as integrated as the other guys, but clearly Whatsup's IP isn't entirely unique or novel. And it's difficult to say that an app whose only function is to send messages over the internet can support an increase in prices, when most people think that messages should be free, and the technology to do so is firmly in place.
Therefore, it's hard to say exactly what Whatsapp is bringing to the table here. Remember ICQ? They had a pretty big userbase back in the day. Where are they now? People have moved on to other methods of sending messages to each other.
Last edited: