I can't believe I'm the only one who sees the potential here for something fishy. While the project seems interesting, thats why I looked at it and am researching it, Treweren Consultants makes money consulting, licenseing and are most likely on the payroll. Getting paid is fine, but it appears to me that whether or not the company is profitable, two things stand out.
1. They are selling work that users donate. This is in direct contrast to most DC programs who do research for the science aspect. If and when a marketable solution is found, they make money and I would bet pay themselves more as their "work" increases.
2. "Not-For-Profit" is a term that many companies use as its easy to get and is a socially accepted phrase that implies the exact opposite of how many are run. That being said, I could find no financial information on FAD at all. Why not open the books for all users to see?
No doubt some of you will think how could anyone possibly question such a program. Its easy. This DC program stands out like a sore thumb, its based overseas, meaning more likely to not have as strict of regulations of any type, and most of their press releases are the same except for a few word changes. Maybe it is a real honest program, but the thought of and the appearance that they are selling work that users donate to make themselves money is wrong. And since I have computers built for and dedicated t DC projects, I'll make sure they are worth it. These are serious issues and would like serious, well researched replies, not "its a good program because....well, it just is".