EXman
Lifer
- Jul 12, 2001
- 20,079
- 15
- 81
Has anyone else noticed that the Reagan Era is cause of the current major messes the US is in?
The Reagan Era dogma is the federal government and particularly its regulatory responsibilities are the cause of all problems in the US. But if you filter out all the noise it comes down to the fact that if the financial markets and off shore oil drilling had been properly regulated the US would not be in the ecological and financial messes it is currently in.
In another thread, people have been ecstatic with the vision of Mr Rand Paul getting the "country back". But what do Mr Paul and the Reagan Era offer? What are their solutions to the current financial and economic messes the US will be paying for generations?
Cut taxes?
Reduce regulation of the business sectors?
What do you think?
I think you give too much credit to Rand Paul.
I voted for him to shake things up, simplify, and call a spade a spade. He is a doctor and not a lawyer or a career politician. No he is not a brainiac. He is off on some things for certain. I think he says some pretty dumb stuff but I think he is down with listening to the Tea party and I'm ok with that. I am Freaking Tired of having the Unions represented with out the little guy. Trey Grayson is a better candidate and I like him better but that is not what I think needs to happen. Mitch McConnell got behind Grayson, I hate McConnell I didn't want Grayson to be McConnell's yesman.
And please say reduce regulation was the problem over the last Bush years. While that is a small part of it we couldn't or didn't want to enforce the regulations we did have. Execution was a joke. Similar to our immigration laws which were also lamed. Having more federal laws does not make lack of enforcement of old federal laws any better most of the time.
Paul is no Reagan but he is no Mitch McConnell either. And he is definately not some goober put up by you lefties like Al Franken.