You should probably have some nervous laughter. It helps diffuse tension such as this case when you've been proven wrong.
You actually believe that your bits and pieces from news articles that were handpicked showed me wrong?
In your mind perhaps, but that is where your insanity started so i am not surprised.
As i said, i'd be fine to cut the foreign policy ties, the only ties we have left.
We don't need the US for that, the US has never gone to war for the UK but the UK has gone to war for the US every single time.
The UK only stands to gain from a distancing of the US and getting closer with the EU.
I think you're mistaken there. I can think of 2 where you're wrong...
You actually believe that your bits and pieces from news articles that were handpicked showed me wrong?
In your mind perhaps, but that is where your insanity started so i am not surprised.
I'm suggesting that the two countries should be enemies and that the USA should help the UK's enemies devour it.As i said, i'd be fine to cut the foreign policy ties, the only ties we have left.
I dispute that the UK has ever gone to war for the US. It went for its own bloodthirsty interests.We don't need the US for that, the US has never gone to war for the UK but the UK has gone to war for the US every single time.
The UK already fucked up with its relations with the EU. Michel Barnier's appointment is a nice reflection on the UK's relationship with the rest of the EU.The UK only stands to gain from a distancing of the US and getting closer with the EU.
WWI and WWII
You said that I was wrong on all the facts and those links show otherwise. Obama has repeatedly snubbed Europeans and especially the British.
I'm suggesting that the two countries should be enemies and that the USA should help the UK's enemies devour it.
I dispute that the UK has ever gone to war for the US. It went for its own bloodthirsty interests.
Why would anyone go to war for the UK? They have a bloodthirsty history. Their Empire killed more people than any other association on the planet. When the UK has blood on its mind, the world suffers. Restraining the UK = peace in the world. Ever since they lost their Empire's possessions through repeated wars/rebellions/protests, the world has been much better off.
The UK already fucked up with its relations with the EU. Michel Barnier's appointment is a nice reflection on the UK's relationship with the rest of the EU.
The UK is all alone in the world. All alone, with so many enemies. Enemies who were tortured by the British. Enemies seeking vengeance. What kind of future is that? It must suck to be British right now and in the near future. Catastrophe is in sight.
Wow, this sounds like something OBL would say about the US, strange how completely fucked up people think alike, isn't it?
You think that the US fought the WWI and the WWII to help the UK?
This is how bad US education has gotten, that you actually believe this?
No need to take the tone of a condescending douchebag.
Obviously it was in our own interest to fight in the two world wars, but we still pulled your asses out of the fire.
There isn't just one reason to do stuff you know. We entered those wars for a multitude of reasons.
No need to take the tone of a condescending douchebag.
Obviously it was in our own interest to fight in the two world wars, but we still pulled your asses out of the fire.
There isn't just one reason to do stuff you know. We entered those wars for a multitude of reasons.
YOU DIDN'T DO SHIT UNTIL YOU WERE ATTACKED AND DECLARED WAR UPON!
You helped the UK? Fuck, we decimated their forces before you even got involved after having been declared war on.
Unfortunately, the USA did not enter the war as a third side. It was a perfect opportunity to obliterate and reform the cultural traits of those governments and societies. Look what happened afterwards - they went straight back to colonialism with situations such as the Suez Canal issue.
Imagine what would have happened if the monarchy was deposed and tarred & feathered and an American flag was flying over Buckingham Palace. We could have freed the vast majority of the world, but we took the easy way out.
Wait, i thought you wanted ex Brittish Commonwealth land to be returned to it's rightful owners? There would be no US then, no Austrailia, no Canada and fuck knows how we would handle Israel.
Nah, the UK didn't do much other than enact genocides in their own colonies during the war (a war they were responsible in creating, too). Awesome management.
There should be no UK.
This is very true, especially in Canada, why we murdered those Canadians by the billions, every single day....
I'm sorry if my answer seems as ridiculous as your quote, i don't usually try to trumph people in retarded posts but i thought i should try just this once just to feel the feeling you must feel every single time you post.
I've been waiting for a direct threat.
There it is.
[Re: Afghanistan]
Token contributions.
YOU DIDN'T DO SHIT UNTIL YOU WERE ATTACKED AND DECLARED WAR UPON!
You helped the UK? Fuck, we decimated their forces before you even got involved after having been declared war on.
FDR said "we will not get involved in Europes war" ONE week before the fucking bombing of Pearl Harbour, it's not like the US changed it's mind and wanted to help out the UK or save the Jews or ANYTHING like that, YOU WERE DECLARED WAR UPON, what the fuck could you do? Say no thanks?
You didn't have a choice any more and that is the ONLY reason the US ever got involved.
Really, this is a pre-emptive strike. Obama, partly of Kenyan descent, would never be accepted as even an equal to European leaders.
There should be no UK.
There's a point there but you're going too far mate. They were there, they were on the right side, and they died with the rest of them.
Yes, far from being equal, I think you'll find his approval rating here far exceeds that in the US. This is only a fact however, and as such, I wouldn't expect you to take it into account.
Hey isn't genocide your favourite word? Could it be used in this instance? Go on you know you want to!
Approval ratings are different than how European leaders perceive him. Just gotta look at Berlusconi and the racist statements he's stated about Obama.
This really tells a lot about you. Genocide always seems to be a solution. How is disbanding a government a genocide?
not sure what statement you're referring to exactly. In any case by 'here' I mean England, and yes Berlusconi is an embaressment to the whole of Europe, but I can find you a long list of American politician who've made racist remarks too.
And what, exactly, is your plan for disabling our government without killing the lot of us? This could be interesting... oh I just thought of another common phrase... 'regime change'...
Sheit, if we had known you would take yourselves so seriously we would never have allowed you to roam free.