As I'm supposed to ask first do you mind if I use this in my sig as an example of your discriminatory tendencies?
No, rules like these are not supposed to be applied to everyone equally...
As I'm supposed to ask first do you mind if I use this in my sig as an example of your discriminatory tendencies?
It would be a peaceful achievement. And it would be great if it accomplishes a just resolution. Considering history and current actions, I think that it could be a NPP type of act if other nations follow suit, too.
Hmmm, so why is this peaceful and the way the UK gained possession of the islands not peaceful?
You can do whatever you want. I would like to be in someone's sig.
But of course if you're intentionally misrepresenting, then that is against the rules.
The UK gained possession with violence. Moreover, it never had legitimate legal claim. Thus, Argentina is trying to regain a just position with peaceful diplomatic and economic means.
It would be a peaceful achievement. And it would be great if it accomplishes a just resolution. Considering history and current actions, I think that it could be a NPP type of act if other nations follow suit, too.
If Argentina can resolve this through diplomatic and economic means, then it would be a great accomplishment, especially in light of the 1982 war. It can show that diplomacy and economics can get you a just position. I think that an example this would then be used by other countries. If used elsewhere, then I think that she may very well be awarded the NPP.
Though I do feel that the Nobel Prize is nothing special, but that's for another thread.
Almost three-fourths of Argentines, cutting across all ages and classes, say recovering the islands is important, and more than two-thirds said they support Fernandez's campaign, according to the Ibarometro polling firm.
Yet despite a radical group's burning of a British flag Thursday that was widely broadcast in Britain, just 3 percent of Argentines say they would support a military solution, the firm found. The findings were based on a Jan. 24 survey of 1,000 people in metropolitan Buenos Aires, home to a third of Argentina's population. The poll's error margin was three percentage points.
Nearly 79 percent of those surveyed favor diplomacy or negotiations to resolve the dispute.
Such unity is "not often found in an Argentina so divided and politicized," said Ignacio Ramirez, Ibarometro's polling director.
"Any way of recovering the islands is considered legitimate, except for war," he added.
How so? Its a direct quote and its in the context of you wishing for a group of people to be discriminated against.
This is another one of those occasions where Mongoose and Worms use words without fully understanding their meaning.
'Peaceful' would be without aggression. Argentina's actions are aggressive, they just aren't using their military to carry out their aggression.
Words have many definitions.
Argentina's actions are peaceful. The UK's actions are aggressive.
It's in the context of one country discriminating another country for cargo inspection.
Argentina has used violence against the UK the UK has not used violence against Argentina.
Where did I say it wasn't? Thats discriminatory by your own admission.
30 years ago under a military junta?
And actually the UK did use aggression against Argentina in the 1800s.
Moreover, obviously in recent times Argentina has shown itself to be very peaceful. The UK? Not so much, they ran into Iraq with the US based on lies and killed thousands.
Provide details.
So are you saying that one country doesn't discriminate against another country? For example, can someone from North Korea just visit the UK without any paperwork?
If they treat that country differently to all other countries then, yes, its discriminatory. Particularly if its not against countries but against ships going to that country.
I already have. Moreover, this is historical fact. Do your own quick reading.
No its not.
Two countries have used violence against the Falklands.
Yes, it is fact.
Provide details for your second statement.
No. You have repeatedly in this thread stated that the UK has used violence against the Falklands, you need to now provide evidence or admit that you're just trolling.
Please provide details for your second statement from the previous post. You didn't provide any details.
So you admit that all your claims of UK violence are trolling and that you wont make them again?