- Oct 9, 1999
- 72,647
- 27
- 91
Originally posted by: OdiN
The crazy thing about their graphs is that even a CPU with more power/watt could be slower than the existing CPU's...though the graph makes it look like it's insanely faster.
Originally posted by: Kensai
Originally posted by: OdiN
The crazy thing about their graphs is that even a CPU with more power/watt could be slower than the existing CPU's...though the graph makes it look like it's insanely faster.
Intel is no longer going for straight performance.. They're going for performance/watt.. Hell a Pentium M is like 5 times better performance/watt than any P4.
Originally posted by: Valkerie
Originally posted by: Kensai
Originally posted by: OdiN
The crazy thing about their graphs is that even a CPU with more power/watt could be slower than the existing CPU's...though the graph makes it look like it's insanely faster.
Intel is no longer going for straight performance.. They're going for performance/watt.. Hell a Pentium M is like 5 times better performance/watt than any P4.
If I could chose between a PM or a P4 EE, I'd get the EE, assuming I wouldn't pay for neither, because I don't have the money for the CPU's in the first place. But it's obvious, you wouldn't get a PM if the P4 EE cost the same unless you're gettin' a laptop.