AznAnarchy99
Lifer
- Dec 6, 2004
- 14,695
- 117
- 106
I'm going to see Antman. If I like it, I will see this FF.
Completely different studios.
I'm going to see Antman. If I like it, I will see this FF.
Meh... I will wait for the dvd release. I liked the other FF better. They could have made them a bit more grim in a hypothetical FF3 and add them to a movie with the avengers. Oh well, i will just have to wait for the full CGI cast and movies in the near future.
No, they can't. Marvel studios does not own the IP to FF. They are different studios: same with Spider-Man and X-Men franchises. These movies are being made by Fox and Warner, I think, in order to keep rights to the IP. Something about the contract, where rights expire after x number of years without a production.
It's the only reason that the most recent Spider-Man movies were rebooted and made, and you can tell because they were so terrible.
However, Fox and Marvel/Disney recently worked out a deal to share Spider-man, so he can now appear in Marvel MCU franchise movies (Iron Man, Cap'n Murica, Hulk, Avengers, Ant Man, Guardians, Immortals, etc), but I don't think Marvel will be able to make a standalone Spider-Man movie. But yet another Spider-man reboot is in the works, anyway.
I'm leery of the MCU being able to do Thanos proper, because they can't include The Silver Surfer. Though I've heard that Marvel long ago neutered Thanos, anyway, because they have been propping up the Avengers, and ended up making them his primary nemesis or something ridiculous (considering how he used to blink and they would all die, I find this stupid).
This is also why Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver in the Avengers (not to be confused with Quicksilver in X-Men DoFP; even though they are the same character) are referred to as "enhanced." They are, in fact, mutants, but Marvel does not currently own the rights to the term "mutants"--it belongs to Fox and the X-Men franchise.
Here is the most updated image detailing the IP. And I was wrong--it was Sony that owned Spiderman. older version
There's actually an error in that image as well. The Hulk should be in the bubble with Namor as the publishing options for The Hulk are with Universal, but Marvel has creative freedom to make a movie.
and lol: Namor. Who wants to do anything with that? I guess Lionsgate was like, "Yeah, uh, can you guys please buy this guy back--how's 10 bucks?"
Here is the most updated image detailing the IP. And I was wrong--it was Sony that owned Spiderman. older version
I'm trying to figure out if the grey shared part with Namor is somehow different than the green shared part with the Maximoff siblings. Are the licensing rights that Marvel enjoys between those groups somehow different, or is it just different coloring in the diagram?
and lol: Namor. Who wants to do anything with that? I guess Lionsgate was like, "Yeah, uh, can you guys please buy this guy back--how's 10 bucks?"
Sub-Mariner is awesome. They should have worked him into the MCU so he could have been in Civil War. MCU doesnt really have any anti-heros, although maybe now its Tony Stark. Just need to remove the wings on his feet.
Namor is, traditionally, more of a nemesis for the FF, though. Doesn't make much sense to bring him into the MCU unless they get the FF, too.
Eventually Marvel will get the rights back to all of their characters, but I'm afraid that superhero movies will have jumped the shark by then.
Early reviews not looking good.
Early reviews not looking good.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=123618early reviews are just trashing it. like 3/10 ...