FAQ: A starter guide to buying lenses for your Canon digital SLR camera.

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
FAQ: A starter guide to buying lenses for your Canon digital SLR camera

Everyone who makes the big jump from a point-and-shoot to a SLR camera comes face-to-face with an unfortunate reality: There is no such thing as a high quality, do-everything lens. The camera powerhouses of Canon, Nikon, Olympus and the rest have yet to produce a lens that will take wide-angle shots and, with a twist of the barrel, reach out and touch someone with a deep zoom. While my trusty and rather aged Canon PowerShot A70 had a very usable 35mm ? 105mm range (3x zoom), a prosumer is typically looking to double that to something along the lines of 10mm ? 200mm.

Unfortunately, if a quality 20x zoom lens is out there, it?s the world?s best kept secret.

Today?s solution? Pack multiple lenses in your camera bag: Two, maybe three. But before you commit to potentially spending thousands of dollars on a set of lenses that do it all, take a moment to consider the type of photography you?re likely to undertake. In the process, you may not only save yourself a load of cash, but also realize something about the kind of photographer you?re destined to be.


Landscape & Architecture Photography

If your natural inclination is to take pictures of the impressive buildings that loom above you, or of the width of a city street as people cross by, or of graffiti splayed out across a dilapidated building, you may be an urban landscape photographer. You?ll want a ultra wide-angle lens, seeing as the constriction of city streets will likely leave you not much room to maneuver away from your subject and still get a clear shot.

Good: The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a beautiful piece of work that gives its user crisp shots with great autofocus speed. At 10mm, you?ve got a very wide field of vision that you can use to stand across the street from a skyscraper looming over you and still make the best of the shot.

Being a first-party Canon lens, build quality and optics are top-notch - but then again, so is the price. The 10-22mm will run you $780 USD brand new. Sample photos can be viewed on the POTN Canon Digital Photography Forums right here.

Almost as good, but cheaper: The Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 is the new budget champion of ultrawides, sacrificing half of the usual lens range for a constantly wide aperture of f/2.8 instead. Praise for the lens has been universal from both amateurs and professionals alike, and few miss the lowered range ? really, it?s the low end that you buy the lens for anyways. At $600 USD, you?re not saving very much by going with a third party lens, but the benefits of that wide aperture really can?t be overstated.

Almost as good, but even cheaper: The Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM will run you $480 USD brand new, which is a considerable savings over the Canon 10-22mm, and comes up with some very impressive visuals of its own (see the POTN thread on the Sigma 10-20mm).

Sigma?s Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) technology matches up comparably with Canon?s USM autofocusing technology, and their 10 year warranty on lenses in Canada is unmatched. It can make getting the Canon 10-22mm, even if you've got the cash, a tough call.


Sports & Events Photography

If your primary goal is to attend sporting events or concerts and want the ability to zoom right in to isolate one or two subjects, you?re in need of a telephoto lens. You?re also going to need a 'fast' lens which has the ability to freeze fast-moving action. The ability to do this will cost you, and there?s no way around that.

Good: As is almost always the case, a first party Canon lens stands out as the best option. Here you?ve got the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, which on a Canon 300D, 350D, 400D, 20D and 30D will actually reflect a focal range of 112-320mm. This is another high-quality ?L? lens from Canon with a constant f/2.8 aperture through the entire zoom range and image stabilization (denoted by ?IS? in the lens name) added on top. That?ll run you a hefty $1950 USD, but that?s the accepted price of a quality telephoto lens.

Almost as good, but cheaper: Can you do without image stabilization? (IS is always a good idea at long zoom ranges, but when you're on a budget...) Pick up the exact same Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM for $1250 USD. However, you've got a third route to go as well. Sigma again steps in with a quality budget option with the Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM for $700 USD.

The dark horse: Well-known as a ?starter? L lens, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM offers the same beautiful optics of its more expensive siblings at half-cost, but with a noted limitation in aperture (thus limiting your lens?s ?speed?). However, at a mere $650 USD this lens has proven to be an extremely popular purchase option.


Walkabout Lenses

So far we?ve looked at the ultra-wide (10mm ? 20mm) and zoom (70mm ? 200mm) lens ranges. But how about that crucial in-between zone for taking photos of stuff that?s not too closeby but not too far away?

Good: Once again, we go first-party with the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens. On a 1.6x field of view crop body like the Canon EOS 350D, Canon EOS 400D (Digital Rebel XT, Digital Rebel XTi) or Canon EOS 30D, that works out to a 27.2 - 64mm focal range; just what we?re looking for. Located squarely in the medium price range for quality lenses (especially considering its ?L? status), the 17-40mm will run you about $765 USD.

Almost as good, but cheaper: I personally own the Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF). You'll notice that this lens boasts a wonderfully low aperture of f/2.8 across its entire focal length, which is a great plus in not-optimal lighting situations and situations in which you'd like to blur the background behind your subject. Having been designed for a full-frame sensor body, the focal length of this lens on your Canon EOS 350D, 20D or 40D will actually be 44.8 - 120mm. This lens retails for about $400 and has never let me down. I should, however, note that anecdotal evidence says that you should purchase your Tamron lenses somewhere where are be able to return it without trouble - a number of users have found some copies of the lens relatively soft.

Almost as good, but cheaper II: Another option coming out of the Tamron workshop is the Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF). This lens is heavily, heavily celebrated by the budget DSLR crowd and is built specifically for 1.6x field of view crop bodies (notice it's a Di II, not a Di like its 28-75mm brethren). Once again, this Tamron offers you a constant aperture of f/2.8 all the way across, but at what many consider a "more usable" focal range than its older cousin, the 28-75mm. And once again, a slight warning should be issued: Many copies of this lens have been reported to be soft, so make your purchase somewhere where you can return/exchange for a sharper version. You can pick up the Tamron 17-50mm for approximately $450.

The dark horse: This is a lens that belongs in every beginner's backpack - bar none. At a mere $110 USD, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, a.k.a. the "Plastic Fantastic", offers an incredibly large aperture, stunningly sharp visuals and a fanastically low physical weight at the cost of a fixed focal length, plastic construction and a sometimes frustrating stepper-style autofocus motor. But for the price and versatility, you simply cannot go wrong.


Notes

In order of appearance, sample photos for each of the lenses mentioned in this post:

1. Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5 - 4.5 USM samples
2. Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 samples
3. Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM samples
4. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM samples
5. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM samples
6. Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM samples
7. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM samples
8. Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM samples
9. Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
10. Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
11. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II samples


Links

1. Starter guide: Buying lenses for your Canon SLR camera
2. Canon Digital Photography Forums (All real-user samples pulled from this website, great resource!)
3. B & H Photo Video (Great online imaging store)
4. Sigma4Less (One-stop shop for Sigma SLR lenses)
 

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,267
3
81
I know I'm not an expert on SLRs or anything, but I'm pretty sure primes are much better lenses than zoom lenses. If I'm right, it's definitely a thing to note. Otherwise, good info :thumbsup:
 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
17,090
2
0
:thumbsup:

Cool write up that many people will find useful .

Thanks for taking the time to write it.

Koing
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,806
46
91
The dark horse: This is a lens that belongs in every single Canon SLR owner?s backpack - bar none. At a mere $80 USD, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, a.k.a. the ?Plastic Fantastic?, offers an incredibly large aperture, stunningly sharp visuals and a fanastically low physical weight at the cost of a fixed focal length, plastic construction and a sometimes frustrating stepper-style autofocus motor. But for the price and versatility, you simply cannot go wrong.


anyone know an equivalent Nikon lens?
 

tfinch2

Lifer
Feb 3, 2004
22,114
1
0
Originally posted by: pontifex
The dark horse: This is a lens that belongs in every single Canon SLR owner?s backpack - bar none. At a mere $80 USD, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, a.k.a. the ?Plastic Fantastic?, offers an incredibly large aperture, stunningly sharp visuals and a fanastically low physical weight at the cost of a fixed focal length, plastic construction and a sometimes frustrating stepper-style autofocus motor. But for the price and versatility, you simply cannot go wrong.


anyone know an equivalent Nikon lens?

uhhh, the Nikon 50mm f/1.8
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,427
8,388
126
Originally posted by: BroeBo
I like my Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8

me too



and isn't the 'range' for the 70-200 on a crop body '112-320?'
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Ironically, I own the Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD but left it out.

It makes a great, great addition as a walkaround lens, especially with its constant f/2.8 aperture over the entire focal range. And as you can see, it boasts some pretty impressive visuals for a third party lens (A photo of me taken on the Tamron 28-75mm on a Digital Rebel XT in the bathroom mirror).

Thanks for the replies, will continue to build the thread in a while. Back to cooking for now.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,806
46
91
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: pontifex
The dark horse: This is a lens that belongs in every single Canon SLR owner?s backpack - bar none. At a mere $80 USD, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, a.k.a. the ?Plastic Fantastic?, offers an incredibly large aperture, stunningly sharp visuals and a fanastically low physical weight at the cost of a fixed focal length, plastic construction and a sometimes frustrating stepper-style autofocus motor. But for the price and versatility, you simply cannot go wrong.


anyone know an equivalent Nikon lens?

uhhh, the Nikon 50mm f/1.8

well obviously but i meant in quality and versatility and price...
 

tfinch2

Lifer
Feb 3, 2004
22,114
1
0
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: pontifex
The dark horse: This is a lens that belongs in every single Canon SLR owner?s backpack - bar none. At a mere $80 USD, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, a.k.a. the ?Plastic Fantastic?, offers an incredibly large aperture, stunningly sharp visuals and a fanastically low physical weight at the cost of a fixed focal length, plastic construction and a sometimes frustrating stepper-style autofocus motor. But for the price and versatility, you simply cannot go wrong.


anyone know an equivalent Nikon lens?

uhhh, the Nikon 50mm f/1.8

well obviously but i meant in quality and versatility and price...

Well now that you put it that way, I'd have to go with the...Nikon 50mm f/1.8

You've got to be kidding me. Are you dense?
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
I wouldn't recommend the Canon 70-200 2.8 for the beginner. If it's a field outdoor sport, you are better off with the f4 version. If you must shoot at a lighted night field, go with the 2.8 options. The 2.8 versions are a lot of dough and less forgiving.

I would stay away from the 18-50 Sigma for walkaround lenses. I heard too many bad things. The good copies are sharp, but QC is bad for this lens. The 17-70 2.8-4 would be a better choice for a begginer, and cheaper. The consistency of good copies is much better than other Sigma walkaround lenses.
 

JoeyM

Senior member
Nov 18, 2003
362
6
81
So, how does the Tamron rate compared to the Canon and Sigma? If it belongs on the list, please add it to the original post. My wife is considering getting into photography and I'm thinking Christmas presents. If I'm only buying two lenses, and one is a telephoto and one is for everyday use (parties, family photos, etc.), what do you recommend for an amateur? Cost matters but is secondary to quality and ease of use.

Thanks,

Joey M.
 

tfinch2

Lifer
Feb 3, 2004
22,114
1
0
Originally posted by: JoeyM
So, how does the Tamron rate compared to the Canon and Sigma? If it belongs on the list, please add it to the original post. My wife is considering getting into photography and I'm thinking Christmas presents. If I'm only buying two lenses, and one is a telephoto and one is for everyday use (parties, family photos, etc.), what do you recommend for an amateur? Cost matters but is secondary to quality and ease of use.

Thanks,

Joey M.

Parties/family photos? (You want a fast prime for parties because you never know how ****** the lighting is going to be)

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...USA&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation

Telephoto?

Of course the 70-200 f/4L

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...REY&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation

But if that is too short this is a damn fine lens:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control...REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
Originally posted by: JoeyM
So, how does the Tamron rate compared to the Canon and Sigma? If it belongs on the list, please add it to the original post. My wife is considering getting into photography and I'm thinking Christmas presents. If I'm only buying two lenses, and one is a telephoto and one is for everyday use (parties, family photos, etc.), what do you recommend for an amateur? Cost matters but is secondary to quality and ease of use.

Thanks,

Joey M.

I had the 28-75 2.8 XR Di ABCDeFG, it was awesome. It wasn't wide enough for my taste, but it's a damn fine lens.
The 17-50 2.8 (new this year) is good as well. Razor sharp. The one thing I didn't like is the AF hunts a lot in anything but excellent lighting, which contradicts the 2.8's abilities. And the AF is noisy as all get out.
Tamron's have a 6 year warranty. Good stuff.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
What about the older lenses that Canon made?

Canon made L lenses for a long time. Good optics should be good optics. What if you came across an L lens from the 80's or 90's?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |