Originally posted by: Beev
Regardless of if they add any sci-fi elements, the gameplay isn't going to be nearly as good as either Far Cry or Crysis.
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
I'm fairly sure there will be none of that in Far Cry 2. It's not the real sequel, Crsyis was.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Far Cry and Crysis, both have real world type action in the beginning - but then they just get retarded with mutants and aliens.
Will Far Cry 2 suffer from this also or will it be completely real world scenarios? I don't want any more sci-fi/horror BS.
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
I'm fairly sure there will be none of that in Far Cry 2. It's not the real sequel, Crsyis was.
says who?
Originally posted by: Beev
Regardless of if they add any sci-fi elements, the gameplay isn't going to be nearly as good as either Far Cry or Crysis.
Originally posted by: Beev
Regardless of if they add any sci-fi elements, the gameplay isn't going to be nearly as good as either Far Cry or Crysis.
Originally posted by: CrystalBay
How bout monkeys with ebola2 virus ?
Originally posted by: iFX
Originally posted by: Beev
Regardless of if they add any sci-fi elements, the gameplay isn't going to be nearly as good as either Far Cry or Crysis.
LMAO. Crysis was a horrible game. Far Cry was "ok" but nothing great. Just two tech demos.
Originally posted by: YBS1
It's not horrible, it's an entertaining FPS. However the graphics are it's claim to fame, if not for that it would have already faded into history. Play wise it's simply not on the level of a Medal of Honor, Call of Duty, Half-Life, Unreal, etc. In fact I've recently reinstalled Far Cry to to see how the 64bit version was and quite frankly Crysis feels like nothing but an elaborate expansion pack to Far Cry (albeit with 3-4 years better visuals). It literally feels like the same game, I think I actually like Far Cry a little more as it seems to have a better mix of indoor/outdoor areas.
Originally posted by: YBS1
I'll give you that. I'm sure the fact that Crysis/Far Cry is such a free roaming game makes it more difficult for the developer to set up much of the "epic" moments that make the above listed games what they are. Still, I wonder what Infinity Ward would churn out with the Crytek engine.
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Originally posted by: iFX
Originally posted by: Beev
Regardless of if they add any sci-fi elements, the gameplay isn't going to be nearly as good as either Far Cry or Crysis.
LMAO. Crysis was a horrible game. Far Cry was "ok" but nothing great. Just two tech demos.
Everyone says Crysis is horriblle? I enjoyed it as far as being an FPS, not just for the graphics.
Bingo.Originally posted by: CP5670
I greatly prefer the open ended levels of Far Cry and Crysis to what most FPSs have in that respect. I want to play games, not interactive movies.
Originally posted by: Cellulose
The LACK of free roaming environments is what really put me off Crysis...
In Far Cry I felt like I had significantly more freedom as I wouldn't be "terminated" for walking 50 metres out of the current combat area.