- Mar 22, 2002
- 10,484
- 32
- 81
If you'd like to continue debating this topic, either start a new thread or PM me. You're thread crapping, which is against the forum rules. Moderators will be contacted.
So let me get this straight... The first law of thermodynamics doesn't apply... and then you say calories in vs calories out does? Either you're not explaining yourself well or you're making some seriously contradictory statements.
Also, what does the CV system have to do with this? We don't talk about the cardiovascular system burning the majority of calories during exercise. We talk about skeletal muscle, since that requires most of the energy utilized in movement.
And now you spout off irrelevant information? Talking about glucose, a carbohydrate derivative... Which is not created by gluconeogenesis, except in EXTREME conditions. You don't seem to understand the conditions under which GNG occurs. It's called starvation. Marathon running. Not everyday life. People survive via ketogenesis on KETONE BODIES, not exactly a preferable source compared to glucose.
The rest of your post made no sense at all. I have no idea what you were trying to say.
If you'd like to continue debating this topic, either start a new thread or PM me. You're thread crapping, which is against the forum rules. Moderators will be contacted.
Whey protein, nor any other supplement, will push you through a plateau. Whey is a supplement for a reason. It's typically used for its ease (compared to eating a chicken breast right after training) and its cost effectiveness. The first thing to look at is your training program. What kind of program are you doing? How many sets and reps? What weights are you using? What's your height, weight, age?
No, high rep training works like aerobic training. It stimulates catabolism to a greater degree than low rep training. Because of this, protein degradation increases and muscle is burned as an energy source. At low reps and high weight, the load (and therefore repair response) is much greater. The body is forced to maintain the muscle mass, rather than degrade it, resulting in body fat being the primary energy source (if the individual is in a caloric deficit). High rep workouts don't quite work the same. They're middle ground in between general cardio and low rep weight work. Low reps, high weight is the most effective for maintaining muscle mass.
Hypertrophic pathways increase protein synthesis over protein degradation. This is important because it allows for muscle maintenance (or sometimes growth) even in a caloric deficit. Cardio is an ineffective way to lose body fat because it results in everything being burned - muscle, fat, and glycogen. With cardio alone (and no dietary modifications), research has shown time and time again that oxidative ability and fitness increase, but body fat does not change. With cardio and a caloric deficit, you lose muscle. With heavy weightlifting alone, beginners will often reduce their body fat % and increase lean muscle mass. In a caloric deficit, weightlifters have shown to lose predominantly fat compared to those participating in endurance exercise.
Therefore, weightlifting is actually a better means of losing weight than cardio. It stimulates pathways that maintain muscle mass and metabolize fat stores. Endurance pathways metabolize everything, resulting in catabolism of everything. With dietary modifications, weightlifting is always the best way to lose weight. Always.
First, we need to address some issues. You are overweight because you DO overeat (or have in the past). The types of food you eat aren't as important in weight gain as overall calories. Even if you're eating a 500 calorie surplus of fruits and veggies, you will still gain weight. It's thermodynamics.
If you want to exercise, go ahead and exercise. That will be a great step toward improving your health and losing weight. I suggest nutritional intervention before exercise because most people are concerned with weight before their health. You can start with either exercise or dietary changes alone, but I would suggest only starting with one. You don't want to overburden yourself and get tired of the whole weight loss process. Some people can do it, but I truly believe chances of success are greater if an individual slowly modifies their overall lifestyle.
You can do whatever you like, to be honest. Just make sure you aren't overdoing it. Read the entire fat loss sticky and follow it. You'll start seeing progress no matter what. Also, I don't quite suggest seeing a personal trainer, as you've mentioned in your other thread. Personal trainers typically have minimal certifications and are unqualified to truly write a program for you. I think you'd be wasting your money.
... another blubbering post by Mr. Ding Dong
No, you said calories count....i said it doesn't.
You don't even know why the first law of thermodynamics doesn't pertain to humans...LOL....you probably don't even know what it is.
Denatured vs. Undenatured whey protein....whats the difference?
Think! If insulin levels are high even in the face of a calorie defecit, hormone sensitive lipase will be inhibited and and fat out of the adipocytes will become impossible. Metabolism at a Glance
Insulin ia a trump trump hormone....it trumps several other metabolic hormones necessary for fat moblization: epinephrine, grwoth hormone, glucagon...all shut down by elevated levels of insulin. ITS NOT ABOUT CALORIES CONSUMPTION! If an obese person ate lot of calories couldn't it be said that a 7-2 person also ate a lot of calories and became tall?!?! :hmm:
Are two 15-minute cardio sessions as good as one 30-minute one? I recall reading that it was just as good, but that was a while back in Men's Health, I think.
I'm finally starting to exercise again, and I prefer to break up the cardio since I get bored quite easily on a cardio machine. I've been doing a 15-minute warm-up on an elliptical, then doing some weights, then finishing with a 15-minute stationary bike. I've been working out for a couple of months with no noticeable results and it's getting discouraging. I haven't controlled my eating, so I know that's a big part of it, and I'm gonna start an eating journal today. But I don't want to maximize the results of my gym time as well.
I'm adding jogging/running into the mix with my strong lifts routine. Is it okay to jog before resistance training ?
I'm shooting for 4 miles per workout and so far it's going great.
Thanks again
Are you jogging directly before lifting? It'll affect your strength pretty significantly as you're lifting due to the muscle fatigue. It's fine, but keep that in mind. Typically, if you're going to lift and run on the same day, you want to run in the morning and lift at night to give your body ample time to recover for a proper lifting session. I know not everyone has that amount of time though. Just be careful. Lifting while fatigued can be dangerous if you don't know your limits.
oh social,
I forgot to ask, with the same topic in mind. Will it be better if i just start my lift and then run ? I know it sounds silly
thanks again !
Well one thing for sure, I notice a big difference with my squats and deadlifts w/o the jogging. So i'll just jog in between my strong lifts.
I'm really excited with the experience and want to maximize my workout routine.
Today i found out my max deadlift is 225 lbs ! (including the olympic bar). All i have to do is starting to get the technique right and consistent.
I really appreciate your input and thought into this social.
Specifically to SC:
Where did you learn all of this info? Its great and I know helped many people achieve their goals (or on the right track to them). Are you a nutritionist, doctor or go to med school?
You've given great tips about my situation so far, and I thank you!