Well, that is about the size I pictured for this poll. The 200lb women I googled looked a little overweight but not fat.
Either way I adjusted the OP again to say 200lbs.
..you serious Clark?
Oh and the chick on the left is 320lbs.
Not horribly fat, I don't think.
Supposedly this chick is 250:
And this one:
Oh and the chick on the left is 320lbs.
1. What do you mean "supposedly?"
2. Later that day, she ate the rail car in the background.
3. NOW we're talking! I wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating crackers. Also, I probably couldn't kick her out of bed. D:
No she isn't. Shaq was 320 pounds, and that woman is no Shaq. Unless her bones have been infused with adamantium or something...Oh and the chick on the left is 320lbs.
A distinction between fat and obese would make this choice clearer for people.
Given the choice between a smoker and Queen Latifah I'd chose the later.
This is ATOT, where we judge all women by who we want escorting us down the red carpet when we're nominated for our 10th Academy Award next year. You can fold a smoker up and store her in an airtight container to preserve the pleasant allure of your Rocky Spring Meadow Glade Air Freshener, but you can't be seen bailing out the side of your limo at the Oscars because your ginormous fattie of a date has destroyed your limo's suspension. That's just simple logic.How do you distinguish without height? I'm technically obese according to BMI since I have broad shoulders. I don't have much body fat though.
I guess weight isn't the best option either, but I knocked it down to 200 and people are still voting smoker. I wouldn't really consider a woman 150-200lbs something that would be an instant turn-off like smoking is to some, which is why I don't see a point in making it any lower.
I guess I gotta go with smoker even though I hate it. fatties are just absolutely the worst.