Bullshit. That passage indicates Rich made certain contributions & that Clinton didn't follow DoJ rules wrt the pardon. Period. It doesn't even approach the accusation you made. That connection exists only in your mind.
P 65-66
I can understand the anti Clinton camp liking this stuff but I do need to point out in Politics what comes around goes around. Don't be surprized if we start seeing Partisan directors that do this shit every election. I don't want that, its how 3rd World places act.
Yeah, pretty soon we'll start getting to where the IRS is used to go after groups based on political ideology..... oh wait...
Sounds like you're ok with the FBIs behavior by the obvious attempt to distract.
Have fun when the wheel spins.
What "behavior" exactly are we talking about from the FBI?
Have fun when the wheel spins? We've already seen government agencies unleashed against groups based on political affiliation, so that certainly would be nothing new.
you think drumpf is a one and done kind of candidate? nope, he's just the beginning, I fear.This election is nuts! I hope to god we never see another like it.
Bullshit. That passage indicates Rich made certain contributions & that Clinton didn't follow DoJ rules wrt the pardon. Period. It doesn't even approach the accusation you made. That connection exists only in your mind.
Damn it actually says they believe the pardon was a result of contributions to the Clinton Foundation in the report!
He made contributions, Clinton pardoned him outside the normal procedures, and this isn't quid pro quo?? The Clintons sure have a knack for getting themselves in ethically compromising situations...
Yep, I'm detecting some kind of internal schism at the FBI and they think they are our saviors.Or some FBI guy with a grudge who's ready to retire.
Do explain
"Actually says" when it doesn't. That's beyond obvious.
Once again when you have nothing else to add, why not split hairs?
Jhhnn - What's your opinion of Peter Kadzik heading up the email investigation?