FBI reopens investigation into Clinton email use

[brycejones]

Wrong:

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...-times-democrats-praised-james-comey-n2239518

Now he is a crook... because they didn't get their way.

And you were singing his praises when he said no earlier this year?

 

[momeNt]

I agree with Harry Reid on this. The FBI investigation needs to be shutdown immediately until we have positive confirmation that Comey is not being partisan, or influenced Trump, or by the Russians, or actually Russian.

This needed to be dealt with after the election, or not at all, the leadership of our country cannot be held hostage by law enforcement.

 

[agent00f]

It is funny to watch your hate hard on for me. Its like your comments are only ad hominems to a imagined creature that you want to believe in.

Not terribly effective coming from a walking stereotype of the snowflake "independent".

My comment was somewhat sarcastic. .. blah...

In order to use the trump card effectively you'll need a legion of followers who won't mind if you rape someone in the middle of the street.

 

[pcgeek11]

And you were singing his praises when he said no earlier this year?

No. I think Comey has shown he has no credibility at all.

 

[agent00f]

No. I think Comey has shown he has no credibility at all.

Your alpha now disagrees.

 

[boomerang]

I agree with Harry Reid on this. The FBI investigation needs to be shutdown immediately until we have positive confirmation that Comey is not being partisan, or influenced Trump, or by the Russians, or actually Russian.

This needed to be dealt with after the election, or not at all, the leadership of our country cannot be held hostage by law enforcement.

Harry Reid is a fucking lying piece of shit scumbag who can't be trusted in the slightest.

 

[agent00f]

It's amazing, that short attention span. The right was up in arms (for some of them, literally, I imagine), that he did not bring charges. They were outright furious because, as a group of people that understands belief to equate to truth, there was no other option than Hillary being guilty. Obviously, she is guilty because I believe it.

The anger was so profound, I think, that it blinded the right to the fact that Comey was roundly excoriated by the left for making this into a political shit show for no reason beyond his own hubris.

Not hard for a smart guy to figure out how easily the trump crowd are swayed by a bone thrown their way. Comey seems a smart guy.

 

[Jhhnn]

Not hard for a smart guy to figure out how easily the trump crowd are swayed by a bone thrown their way. Comey seems a smart guy.

You don't even have to throw it. A pump fake works as well.

 

[realibrad]

You don't even have to throw it. A pump fake works as well.

That base is very emotional. Facts and reason only get in the way. Saying something that feels real is enough for their action. This is why Bengazi sticks around for so long. It feels like something Hillary would do in their mind, therefore it is real. Evidence is simply a cover up because they know she is evil. Trying to argue against that is trying to promote evil. If someone is trying to promote evil, then you must be devoted to stopping evil any way possible and must not be tempted by its lies.

 

[OutHouse]

I agree with Harry Reid on this. The FBI investigation needs to be shutdown immediately until we have positive confirmation that Comey is not being partisan, or influenced Trump, or by the Russians, or actually Russian.

This needed to be dealt with after the election, or not at all, the leadership of our country cannot be held hostage by law enforcement.

how about not having the leader of the party not do shit to get investigated? The FBI and law enforcement need to do their job. nobody is above the law including politicians running for office.

 

[Jhhnn]

how about not having the leader of the party not do shit to get investigated? The FBI and law enforcement need to do their job. nobody is above the law including politicians running for office.

How about Repubs not crazifying their base with endless empty scandals & predictions of the end of America as we know it? How about some policy initiatives on their part that don't involve the magical thinking of trickle down, the lost cause of abortion, stupid gun grabber rhetoric & the rest of their usual repertoire?

 

[mrjminer]

Frankly, if the investigation was unbiased to begin with, Hillary would already be indicted. Comey is a shill (Lynch too, obviously), and the only reason this investigation has been re-opened is because there was no way it couldn't have been with the amount of e-mails that came to light in the Weiner case. There was already an overwhelming amount of evidence that she violated the espionage act with the first batch of e-mails. How quickly the hero Comey falls from the Democrat pedestal after he refuses to withhold information that has come to light and divulges it as required so that he may later refuse to recommend prosecution for Hillary. Releasing the information now is the only way he can help Hillary in the future.

how about not having the leader of the party not do shit to get investigated? The FBI and law enforcement need to do their job. nobody is above the law including politicians running for office.

Whoa, whoa, whoa... hold on there. Are you really suggesting that people shouldn't be ignoring evidence due to their presumption that the FBI is out to get Hillary now? What do you have against women?

 

[UglyCasanova]

how about not having the leader of the party not do shit to get investigated? The FBI and law enforcement need to do their job. nobody is above the law including politicians running for office.

What if it's an election year though?

 

[alien42]

ffs stop with your near hysterical attempts to cast Hillary as someone of virtue.

once again, pure projection and zero reality. i don't think i've heard anyone say that Hillary is someone of virtue, well, besides Trump.

she's a typical politician in a lot of ways and far more prepared for the job than Trump.

 

[senseamp]

Typical politician and virtuous is not mutually exclusive. Whatever virtues you can bring to the job, you have to get elected first in a post Citizens United world.

 

[agent00f]

Frankly, if the investigation was unbiased to begin with, Hillary would already be indicted. Comey is a shill (Lynch too, obviously), and the only reason this investigation has been re-opened is because there was no way it couldn't have been with the amount of e-mails that came to light in the Weiner case. There was already an overwhelming amount of evidence that she violated the espionage act with the first batch of e-mails. How quickly the hero Comey falls from the Democrat pedestal after he refuses to withhold information that has come to light and divulges it as required so that he may later refuse to recommend prosecution for Hillary. Releasing the information now is the only way he can help Hillary in the future.

Whoa, whoa, whoa... hold on there. Are you really suggesting that people shouldn't be ignoring evidence due to their presumption that the FBI is out to get Hillary now? What do you have against women?

Would you say you're any kind of expert on the law here, presumably from reading some right wing blogs written for a less than intelligent audience?

 

[senseamp]

He's forgetting to mention that if there were unbiased investigations into Trump, he would be in prison for sexual assault, tax evasion, and child molestation, among other things.

 

[mrjminer]

Would you say you're any kind of expert on the law here, presumably from reading some right wing blogs written for a less than intelligent audience?

No, but I get my information from an expert on the law. His name is Mark Levin. You should try listening to him sometime instead of scarfing down what you think is knowledge.

 

[Jhhnn]

Frankly, if the investigation was unbiased to begin with, Hillary would already be indicted. Comey is a shill (Lynch too, obviously), and the only reason this investigation has been re-opened is because there was no way it couldn't have been with the amount of e-mails that came to light in the Weiner case. There was already an overwhelming amount of evidence that she violated the espionage act with the first batch of e-mails. How quickly the hero Comey falls from the Democrat pedestal after he refuses to withhold information that has come to light and divulges it as required so that he may later refuse to recommend prosecution for Hillary. Releasing the information now is the only way he can help Hillary in the future.



Whoa, whoa, whoa... hold on there. Are you really suggesting that people shouldn't be ignoring evidence due to their presumption that the FBI is out to get Hillary now? What do you have against women?

Deeply committed to the principles of Truthiness, huh? Is your ego so fragile & your self righteousness so strong that you can't contemplate the idea you might be mistaken?

It seems clear to me that Comey, the FBI & the DoJ are in a helluva lot better qualified & positioned than either of us to make those determinations.

Mark Levin? Sweet freaking Jebsu...

 

[mrjminer]

Deeply committed to the principles of Truthiness, huh? Is your ego so fragile & your self righteousness so strong that you can't contemplate the idea you might be mistaken?

It seems clear to me that Comey, the FBI & the DoJ are in a helluva lot better qualified & positioned than either of us to make those determinations.

Look to the corrupt for their determinations on the corrupt. Nobody else is an expert. They are the ultimate overlords of us lowly peons. Even a non-lawyer, non-criminal justice person, non-officer, non-politician can see the obvious violations, though as I said in my post that you probably didn't see while you were typing that I get much of my information from Mark Levin, who is a helluva lot better qualified than either of us to make those determinations.

 

[agent00f]

No, but I get my information from an expert on the law. His name is Mark Levin. You should try listening to him sometime instead of scarfing down what you think is knowledge.

To reiterate for clarity, I'm not accusing the him of being stupid but rather the audience he knows listens to conservative talk radio. Would you say they're the sort to read the FBI investigation or some reasonable summary of to check their facts?

 

[senseamp]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...tainted-comey-must-go/?utm_term=.b8a2d47dcb0b

Apparently it’s now fair game to spill the beans on investigations, smearing those involved and raising the specter of wrongdoing. This is outrageous, a corruption of the FBI or a lack of self-discipline so severe as to question its competency and integrity.

Even WP's resident right wing hack is saying the FBI has been politicized and actively interfered in the election against Democrats but was careful to not do so against Republicans, and is calling for Comey to go.

 

[Jhhnn]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...tainted-comey-must-go/?utm_term=.b8a2d47dcb0b

Even WP's resident right wing hack is saying the FBI has been politicized and actively interfered in the election against Democrats but was careful to not do so against Republicans, and is calling for Comey to go.

Add this-

https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/...-james-comey?utm_term=.jgpEjEgz2Q#.dx9VEVRZyL

 

[mrjminer]

To reiterate for clarity, I'm not accusing the him of being stupid but rather the audience he knows listens to conservative talk radio. Would you say they're the sort to read the FBI investigation or some reasonable summary of to check their facts?

Anecdotally, yes, at least more likely than people listening to or watching other shows. For instance, I've read the relevant portions of the act and seen some of the e-mails / evidence on other sources / interviews / her comments and she, without a doubt, violated the espionage act. Levin has a fair amount of call-ins from people referencing other sources and explaining how some of the things they've independently discovered have further supported something he has said, or introduced their take on something, often with some form of corresponding information. Of course, retards call in, too, as with all shows. I would say that Levin's audience is probably the best educated audience out of any audience of any political program on any format because I think that someone listening to Levin is immediately more educated than if they were to spend their time on any other program or show. Largely, this is due to Levin himself encouraging people to look up primary sources, and using direct, sometimes lengthy, audio of what people have actually said. He also goes straight to the horse's mouth very often -- on both sides D or R -- and calls out their bullshit. If you aren't some nutjob radical leftist like some on this forum (or shit, even if you are!), all of his broadcasts are available for free on his website around 20 minutes after they air. Some are better than others, and sometimes his mannerisms are distasteful, but it's, overall, easily the most educational political program around.

Anyways, I've heard Comey's interview where he declined to press charges (yea, that one on Levin), and it doesn't add up in the slightest. Comey, basically, cites a bunch of evidence clearly outlining valid reasons Hillary should be prosecuted, then says that she didn't have the "intent" to violate the espionage act and that they will not pursue charges. Well, intent isn't the standard; the standard is gross negligence, and people have been convicted and are currently serving time based on this fact. Comey and Lynch have refused to follow the law when it comes to Hillary Clinton.

 

[Jhhnn]

To reiterate for clarity, I'm not accusing the him of being stupid but rather the audience he knows listens to conservative talk radio. Would you say they're the sort to read the FBI investigation or some reasonable summary of to check their facts?

Oh, Hell no! Right wing talk radio is a religious cult experience for the faithful. Only they know the truth.