Last week you enjoyed this:
Today you're burning thorough these:
Tomorrow you will need this:
My guess is that Bill took the opportunity to get an update from Lynch on the investigation away from prying eyes.
lol Another leftie longing for the politics of Russia.
Besides the fact that absolutely nothing from the Russian Times can ever be trusted, SCOTUS set the bar for prosecution of corruption impossibly high. Foreign governments and businessmen are free to give millions to the Clintons and receive favors in return as long as o one is stupid enough to actually put in writing a quid pro quo contract.
Expect his resignation on Obama's desk, 8am this Wednesday morning, Nov 9th.
Two things.That was the stupidest thing I have read today. The media in other countries don't sugar coat the Clinton's corruption. You have crazies on the left who are triggered by anything that doesn't come from CNN or any other lieberal media outlet. And to make things worse you have have stupid trolls on cable television shows vying for whats left of the airheads on the left, who claim to be comedians but are simply dumbassed extremists with a smiley face who think Hillary's bull shit is funny.
Sites like CNN or any other ALT LEFT cable TV propaganda outlets are full of Hillary's lies - open border, globalist, socialist country high tax rates horse shit nonsense. All others are likely the truth!
Today, RT has much more credibility than CNN ever will. Sadly this was not the case back in the 80's when our beloved Ronald Reagan was president and politicians knew how to be civil.
Too bad you were a toddler back in the 80's, you obviously don't know any better.
But its true though. You would know that RT provides a clearer non biased view than CNN does simply by living through those times. Think a little longer before you respond, I have a few more productive things to do this morning.
But its true though. You would know that RT provides a clearer non biased view than CNN does simply by living through those times. Think a little longer before you respond, I have a few more productive things to do this morning.
Bull chips. I was born back when Eisenhower was Prez and I lived the Reagan years, along with a few others. Your embrace of RT is your decision that you made by yourself, living through a particular time did not make it happen. Just admit that you prefer Russian news to American news, that you trust the Russian media to not deceive you.
That your confirmation bias leans Russian is hilarious.
Eisenhower was a good man and he would disagree with your spelling of "president". Embracing multiple media outlets for the sake of comparing information is not only right, but wise. If you were not so left leaning you would know the error of your ways.
Registered small "i" independent, no party affiliation, never have either. I've voted for both Democrats and Republicans and lean left on some things and rightward on others, like a lot of Americans. The way things have been lately though I may as well be registered Democrat since all the Republicans seem to be offering are crazy people (look up Art Robinson in Oregon for some laughs). That's not my fault though, is it?
Multiple media outlets are great, just as long as they aren't Breitbart, Fox, InfoWars, RT and the other usual wingnut shitholes of less than worthless information.
/a really dumb response...
Did I pick that rag you are drawing your conspiracy lines all over? Nope. Don't bother responding, I'm just going to laugh at you from now on. Fucking pathetic.
I don't know what you're a doctor of but is it related to pot smoking?
I circled the bias on a left wing "rag" to counteract your unfair portrayals of RT. It helps to demonstrate bias (and not conspiracy as you put it) on the left.
Your responses are becoming predictable and rude "doctor". Please, keep your responses civil.
But its true though. You would know that RT provides a clearer non biased view than CNN does simply by living through those times. Think a little longer before you respond, I have a few more productive things to do this morning.
But its true though. You would know that RT provides a clearer non biased view than CNN does simply by living through those times. Think a little longer before you respond, I have a few more productive things to do this morning.
This, exactly. Whenever Putin wishes to drive Russian opinion in a certain direction, he has articles inserted in the Russian Times. It is literally his tool whenever he wants it.RT is literally a Russian government propaganda instrument. It was founding by the Putin government. Former employees, hell former KGB agents, call it an instrument of manipulation and misinformation purely to assert control over the Russian people by Putin. It deserves no faith at all.
Not sure what's in the first graphic but yes, we're all going to need lots of tissue and Vasoline no matter which one of these deplorables are elected. But since I voted for Johnson, whomever wins it's not my fault.Last week you enjoyed this:
Today you're burning thorough these:
Tomorrow you will need this:
CNN is full of people willing to pay almost any cost to put Hillary into power. Russian Times has no such qualifier; they are Putin's tool without any regard whatsoever for profitability or credibility. There's a huge (think orange huge) difference between a news outlet full of people with a common ethos, and a news outlet which is merely a tool of a dictator.Today, RT has much more credibility than CNN ever will. Sadly this was not the case back in the 80's when our beloved Ronald Reagan was president and politicians knew how to be civil.
As to being civil, you evidently aren't quite old enough to remember Reagan's elections. Most of what is said about Trump was also said about Reagan, and both Bushes, McCain, and Romney. Of course, the big difference here is that much of the attacks against Trump can be backed up with his own words.