People associated with the deal donated millions to the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to curry favor with the Secretary of State for a favorable outcome.
So to be clear you believe Russia's plan to secure access to US Uranium was to spend millions of dollars bribing one of 9 agencies (and one other country) responsible for the outcome? How did they get everyone else? Were they all bribed too? Why did they spend so much on the bribes before Clinton was even thought of as Secretary? Why was the person doing the bribing doing all their bribery for a company they no longer had any stake in, long before he even knew Clinton would be Secretary? This has to be the dumbest bribery plot in history.
This appears to be the root of your problem here in that you haven't taken the time to sit down and think about what it would take to get from A -> B here. From purely a logic perspective it is incoherent.
What post number was your answer to my question? You keep saying you answered it but I’m a bumbling idiot so missed it.
It doesn't matter if you missed it, I repeated it for you in that post. Again I don't know why you're taking this so personally. All we are doing is pointing out that you have a strong opinion about something based on no evidence and supporting a narrative that is logically incoherent. It's why I keep asking you to explain your narrative of the plot in detail because if you do that you'll see how ridiculous and factless it is.