She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
Some of this is accurate. I agree she should be prosecuted. It's the bolded part I don't get. In Manning's case, it was just one. In Snowden's case, it was just one. These cases were extensively investigated and we've heard no evidence of co-conspirators. So why must we assume that others were involved in this case?
Did some one hit your erudite button or did you just find a conservative propaganda think tank site to drag and drop.
At least you question whether you are right. Leaves room for doubt, leaves room for you to eventually come to realize you are wrong. Good on ya!Sorry, can't help it if I'm right...?
Some people work for the government to protect the citizens of the USA from harm and some people work to defend their idealogy and their propaganda, which makes you a traitor.
She took an oath and signed numerous confidentially "security" agreements. She was advised under penalty of law..when such agreements are signed she is responsible and culpable. She violated all of her signed agreements numerous times thus establishing a "pattern" of criminal behavior. She also had / has willing accomplices in her circle who are all part of her "criminal" pattern of behavior. She has done serious damage to National Security. All those employees / contacts in her circle of influence including supervisors need to have their security clearance cancelled. This is a National Security issue that must be investigated to determine how deep and wide this National Security breach is. There is never just "one cockroach".
At least you question whether you are right. Leaves room for doubt, leaves room for you to eventually come to realize you are wrong. Good on ya!
Well tantrums aren't partisan as evidenced by the last 8 years
But treason must be revealed. That should be everyone's point of view. I may be progressive but I disliked Trump before his run because he is a win-at-all-costs piece of dung. That's important to remember as this bs presidency runs its course. In this case we're talking about someone who wouldn't be above treason to get what he wants. I believe he is a treasonous pig and I for one am happy that leaks are pouring in to nail his ass. Should there be consequences for this girl? Yes, but then I want her pardoned as soon as the traitor is out of office. Maybe she shouldn't be celebrated but she certainly shouldn't be villainized. Now if she were leaking information to enemies rather than the American people then she would be a traitor and should be punished accordingly.
Nope, they sure aren't.
Well, "treason". We have a wag the dog situation in basically a willingly (and stung because their Billary wasn't elected despite their absolute best efforts) Media is happily going with OMG Russia, and the Dems, since it's basically one of their only plays, will absolutely do anything and everything they can do to foster that wagging. Does anyone really expect a party/supporters enamored with Socialism and Communism to suddenly be horrified that OMG Russia! may have tried to influence our election? LOL! They're interested only so they can tie Trump to OMG Russia and erode support for Trump/Reps, so 2018 (and beyond) is less of a challenge for them. Period. It's laughable to look at the mock hysteria and not see it for what it is...
Nope, they sure aren't.
Well, "treason". We have a wag the dog situation in basically a willingly (and stung because their Billary wasn't elected despite their absolute best efforts) Media is happily going with OMG Russia, and the Dems, since it's basically one of their only plays, will absolutely do anything and everything they can do to foster that wagging. Does anyone really expect a party/supporters enamored with Socialism and Communism to suddenly be horrified that OMG Russia! may have tried to influence our election? LOL! They're interested only so they can tie Trump to OMG Russia and erode support for Trump/Reps, so 2018 (and beyond) is less of a challenge for them. Period. It's laughable to look at the mock hysteria and not see it for what it is...
insanity
Didn't the DNC email leaks and Comey's testimony before Congress tell us who the real perpetrators behind influencing the election? No mention of the Russians or Trump found.
WASHINGTON —
Lost in the showdown between President Donald Trump and James B. Comey that played out last week was a chilling threat to the United States. Comey, the former director of the FBI, testified that the Russians not only had intervened in last year’s election but would try to do it again.
“It’s not a Republican thing or Democratic thing — it really is an American thing,” Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee. “They’re going to come for whatever party they choose to try and work on behalf of. And they’re not devoted to either, in my experience. They’re just about their own advantage. And they will be back.”
lol +1Reality Winner. I think she should be let free and her parents do the time.
DNC emails weren't leaked but rather hacked. That's obvious to anybody who cares about the truth more than Seth Rich conspiracy theories.
And Comey obviously didn't say what you claim at all-
http://www.myajc.com/news/gen-polit...d-standoff-with-trump/bnRrczrP0WQSh3kQYUlxpJ/
In 2016, they obviously believed working on behalf of Trump was to their advantage.
How does it feel knowing that Russian intelligence was doing all they could to help your guy? Do you really think Donald chumped them the way he chumped 63M voters?
Amusing. How does it feel to be on the same side as Russian propagandists? You are, you know.
Might want to integrate that simple fact into your thinking processes.
wow, i actually feel sorry for you and would love to see you get treatment but i highly doubt you'd be open to it.
Didn't the DNC email leaks and Comey's testimony before Congress tell us who the real perpetrators behind influencing the election? No mention of the Russians or Trump found.
I'm pretty sure Comey said that AG Lynch wanted him to change his communication about the "matter" to match what the Clinton campaign was communicating. Since when does the AG order DOJ officials to have their communication in lock step with political candidates? Sounds like collusion. We know that the DNC colluded with the "News" and Hillary to help her win the primary. Sounds like collusion. Zero evidence of Russians colluding, hacking, or rigging the election. We have evidence that Mexico was trying to influence the election by supplying money and resources to help Mexican nationals become US citizens in order to vote for Democrats.