JulesMaximus
No Lifer
- Jul 3, 2003
- 74,534
- 911
- 126
While I do think games like Chess don't fall into his generalization, every physical sport does. Ever watch the Olympics? The best women in the world couldn't even compete with the worst men that qualified. Men are simply evolved into better physical performers, and rightfully so. Men, for the most part, are expendable. Thus, they evolved into the warriors and protectors of women, who did not need to evolve in such a way. A single man can repopulate a village of women; a single women cannot. It is the same for a lot of other species as well. Lots of male birds are more vibrant in color than the females, giving the females the camouflage advantage. Males are generally larger and stronger than females, who need time to birth and care for the young.
I think the reason Chess has a separate league is merely because traditionally there are male and female leagues for competitive sports.
Yes, but we aren't talking about physical sports, we're talking about chess. There is no reason why a woman couldn't be as good at chess as a man.