Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: griffis
His name was on the title. I don't think it's stupidity for not putting her name on it as well. My dad's name is still on my title along with mine. We only did that for insurance purposes.
I am a little shocked for some of the reactions here. Some of you people actually agree that since the car was in his name that he had a right to beat her as a child and emotionally beat her up as well? Especially when she's pregnant? I mean just seems a little harsh is all
What did you expect? She has no legal right to the car, period. Everything else is just filler for your story. Do I agree w/ his actions? No, but you can't argue who owns the car.
And I find your "abuse" claims a little out there. No one puts physical abuse in a P.S. at the end of their post unless they're looking for a reason to keep people feeling sorry for them.
You learned a lesson and you will be learning many more. The only advice I have is to remember how her father acted and
NEVER turn out like him.
good post. i'm going to be harsh here, simply because of my initial reaction, and also because i'm in the mood.
i too, am skeptical of a post that includes a little side note that can in no way be verified and has little to do with the original message. the relationship between the father and the daughter has to be relatively healthy for the father to buy his daughter a car for her academic accomplishments. it sounds like we're only getting one side of the story. You mention that he emotionally abuses her and tells her she won't amount to anything, yet he bought her a $20,000 present for doing good in school? THIS MAKES NO SENSE.
i was hit when i was a kid also, but that's part of the discipline i received. i know several people that might say that i was "beat" just to prove a particular point, when in reality it was just a well deserved spanking. i'm inclined to believe that either you're exaggerating her father's disciplinary tactics to gain sympathy, or your fiance took the liberty of embellishing the story when she told you about her childhood.
now, whether you're seeking advice or solidarity, i'm uncertain. however, considering my perspective, i'm sure you won't take my advice. i'll share it regardless, simply because i like hearing (and reading) my own thoughts.
1. one thing that you mentioned, with which i agree, is that you're never prepared prepared for a child - regardless of whether your 24 or 42, you never know what to expect. however, this is NOT the point. at 42 (and 32) you're MUCH better prepared than at 22 and 23. i don't understand how anybody can argue this point. at 23, you are better off waiting to have children.
2. you mentioned
"Some of you people actually agree that since the car was in his name that he had a right to beat her as a child and emotionally beat her up as well? Especially when she's pregnant? I mean just seems a little harsh is all"
if that's not the most ridiculous statement i've read, then it most certainly ties for second. how can you reconcile this statement with other posts? who in their right mind would condone physical abuse? i don't know if somehow you grossly misinterpreted somebody's post, or are again trying to rally sympathy and support by skewing the issue.
3. also, you mentioned
"I let him know that if he took the car away then he was also revoking his right as a grandparent, he basically laughed at me and said he didn't care."
**squint ** did i read this right?? if the grandfather takes away the car, he's revoking his rights as a grandparent?? is it just me, or does someone picture a 14 year old girl crying and yelling at her mom that she'll disown her parents if they don't let her go out with her boyfriend? honestly, i would laugh at you too. it seems rather immature (and ineffective) to wager the relationship between a GRANDPARENT AND THEIR GRANDCHILD ON A CAR.
you're both approaching the issue poorly, plain and simple. it seems as if the father still supports his daughter. this seems like a simple case of "ok, well because you didn't do your homework, i'll take away your tv rights" except that it's, "ok, if you want to live an adult life and make adult decisions, go out and support yourself like the rest of the adults, beginning with getting your own car."
he still has the right to exert some sort of influence over her - HE'S HER FATHER. he's also right to be scared about a child at this point, and he's also right in trying to convince you to reconsider. he's 50 for sh!t's sake and from the sound of it, he had a child in his late twenties and again in his late 40s. i think he is damn well qualified to tell you at what age it's better to have children.
granted, his tactics probably aren't the best. he shouldn't berate her (if your claim of emotional abuse is actually true) and he probably shouldn't take away the car. as far as the car's concerned, maybe you should suggest to pay a monthly amount equal to the car payment (or what the car would normally cost).
and for the benefit of your child - for christ sake, reconcile your differences with your fiance's father. you don't want a rift in the family. you, your fiance, and your child will need all the support they can get.
=|