Find-A-Drug - What hardware are you using to crunch?

[beatle]

I'm wondering if I have a chance to catch any more of you (or if I'm going to be caught. ) My Tbird @ 1266 runs 24/7, though I occasionally capture and edit video. It's my only machine... so far.

 

[Crazee]

I was running it on a XP 1800+, but it crashed.....so soon it will be a Barton XP 2500 on an Asus Nforce2 motherboard.

 

[beatle]

Dang... I mean, great!

 

[Mloot]

2.4 P4.

 

[ShrikeAR]

XP1600 + XP1700 full time, except when I am on them.
XP2000 once in a while. Like when GEOBOT starts to catch up!

Had a -lousy- week. Actually cancelled two tasks. Both went up to about 30 percent, stopped, then went to 300,000+ seconds without moving the percentage... with single digit hits.

I hate cancelling them, but I still believe the software might have looping issues. Ever have those times when it hits 99.9%, then takes 100,000 more seconds? That cannot be legit... has to be a bug.

ShrikeAR

 

[beatle]

I've had ones like that too. In fact, one took 47 hours to complete with only 25 hits! I did crunch my first "no hitter" today though and it only took 2 hours.

 

[BitSpit]

Transcend - P4M 1.8 (laptop/desktop replacement. On and crunching whenever at home)
Romulus - Duron 850
Remus - Duron 850 (yes, I have 2. It's also identical to Romulus)
Aurora - Slot A Athlon Tbird 900
Andromeda - Slot A Athlon Tbird 700
Neptune - Athlon Classic 700
Mars - P2 350
Polaris - P2 266 (old laptop)
Pulsar - P2 250 (up and down whenever it feels like it)
Borealis - K6 233 (and one time, it and Aurora were my only systems with AMD processors)
Frequency - Pentium MMX 266 (older laptop)
Becky - Pentium MMX 233 (the one I let my mom use)
Transient - Pentium 133 (really old laptop with plastic missing)
Pluto - MediaGX 266 (slower than the P133)

Still debating if I want to upgrade the Durons to XP 2100s. It would be a doubling of the clock speed but then I'd have two unused CPUs.

 

[BitSpit]

Originally posted by: ShrikeAR
XP1600 + XP1700 full time, except when I am on them.
XP2000 once in a while. Like when GEOBOT starts to catch up!

Had a -lousy- week. Actually cancelled two tasks. Both went up to about 30 percent, stopped, then went to 300,000+ seconds without moving the percentage... with single digit hits.

I hate cancelling them, but I still believe the software might have looping issues. Ever have those times when it hits 99.9%, then takes 100,000 more seconds? That cannot be legit... has to be a bug.

ShrikeAR

That's actually normal behavior. FaD does something similar to UD's LigandFIT. However, the difference is that the FaD client does it instead of the server like UD.

 

[beatle]

Damn, BitSpit. What does this entire setup look like? Are these in racks or under tables?

 

[JSkorna]

XP 1900
XP 1500
Cele. 600 Laptop
PII 600
PII 600
PI 233 Takes about 5 days for one WU!!

Edit: All run 24/7