- Nov 15, 2007
- 674
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: event8horizon
the nist focused on a single hypothetical blast scenario. involving column 79 on floor 12 with 9 lbs RDX. they didnt test anything else it looks like b/c "other scenarios would have required more explosives. or were considered infeasible to carry out without detecdtion."
i guess they didnt test the thermite/thermate scenario.
They didn't test it because the evidence did not point towards an explosion... duh. Why waste resources when the evidence is clearly telling you that a fire brought the building to structural failure.
There is just no convincing you. We'd have better success opening a door with the words "Open Sesame" than showing you that you are a crazy, tinfoil hat wearing loon.
as posted above they didnt test for the signitures of explosives.
their evidence didnt point towards it but others have. what the evidence they had to look at and analyze is still not available to the public.