Fired for Refusing to Reveal Facebook Password

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
There is two side to the the story. 1) Employer should never ask for passwords to anyone's privately owned Internet accounts, gmail/facebook/twitter whatever.

But 2) Employees should never use social network to revel work problems, company secret, or make fun of co-workers, complain and demonize co-workers. If someone is found violating that principle, there should be ways for independent party to verify the complain/violation, and for companies to take action.

I have seen social network abused by individuals to do something really tasteless to their coworkers, and something needs to be done about that.

At the time, Hester was a teacher's aide at Frank Squires Elementary in Cassopolis. According to a letter from the Cassopolis schools superintendent to the Lewis Cass Intermediate superintendent, a parent who was friends with Hester on Facebook notified the school about the picture.

The complaining parent can hand over her Facebook password.



MotionMan
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,035
1
81
There is two side to the the story. 1) Employer should never ask for passwords to anyone's privately owned Internet accounts, gmail/facebook/twitter whatever.

But 2) Employees should never use social network to revel work problems, company secret, or make fun of co-workers, complain and demonize co-workers. If someone is found violating that principle, there should be ways for independent party to verify the complain/violation, and for companies to take action.

I have seen social network abused by individuals to do something really tasteless to their coworkers, and something needs to be done about that.

The highlighted is the most important thing you wrote. "If someone is found" to be spreading information about the company. Yes, that is (and should be) grounds for termination, just as if they'd printed out a page and walked it off the premesis.

That does not, however, entitle an employer to go on a fishing expedition looking through all of an employees posessions (both digital and physical) for evidence of such a breech without first knowing that such a breech had occured. Suspicion or accusation without proof is not enough.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
The highlighted is the most important thing you wrote. "If someone is found" to be spreading information about the company. Yes, that is (and should be) grounds for termination, just as if they'd printed out a page and walked it off the premesis.

That does not, however, entitle an employer to go on a fishing expedition looking through all of an employees posessions (both digital and physical) for evidence of such a breech without first knowing that such a breech had occured. Suspicion or accusation without proof is not enough.

Exactly, employer in no way should be able to go through all their employee's privately own accounts (the only exception is employer owned company email...etc). But like I said, Facebook and the like should be able to handle improper use of the account and provide company the info (only the info related to the incident) for company to take disciplinary action.

Pretty much like the function of our moderators, doesn't work for either party but make sure the forum is not abused and being use for improper actions.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
I couldn't care less what the teacher does on their time.

It's their time to use as they see fit, not mine.

Negative Ghost Rider.

It's not any different than abortion.

Men control women's bodies in the U.S.

Just as you must supply all password's and account for everything you do outside of work.

You belong to the Government and Corporations.
 

Joseph F

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2010
3,523
2
0
Negative Ghost Rider.

It's not any different than abortion.

Men control women's bodies in the U.S.

Just as you must supply all password's and account for everything you do outside of work.

You belong to the Government and Corporations.

Right, because people who are against abortion just want to control women's bodies. They have no interest in protecting the unborn at all.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,782
845
126
The complaining parent can hand over her Facebook password.



MotionMan

I think they wanted the picture as evidence and to know who it was and I would assume the parent would not know who it was but seeing as the person that was fired took it they needed her to provide it.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
Everyone should be fired if they do not give their password to their employer.

You and everything you do both on and off work belongs to the Corporation.

Exactly. Finally someone I can agree with around here. The harder it is to fire people the harder it is to hire them. For this reason, people need to learn that it is in their own interests to give up the inherent protections given to them by the law. The more the peoples rights are stripped of them, the more empowered they will be.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
We shouldn't need unions to protect ourselves from common sense.

Awwww, isn't it cute when they're young and naive! Let's see... historically we've had companies dumping tons of pollutants into the environment - just draining things into the local river. Why? Because their competitors were doing the same, and to compete, they couldn't pay extra costs to get rid of those toxins. "Common sense" would be not to dump toxic waste into the local river. (This isn't the reason for unions - it's the reason for things like the EPA.) It's just an incredibly easy example of how common sense doesn't run businesses.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
I think they wanted the picture as evidence and to know who it was and I would assume the parent would not know who it was but seeing as the person that was fired took it they needed her to provide it.

That does not make any sense. With the password to the parent's account, they would have access to the picture and proof as to which account it was posted.

MotionMan
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
Lots of places demand you give them a urine sample, some even require a blood test, background checks aren't all that uncommon, and a credit check is apparently necessary to get a job at many places now. I see this as just the next step in the process. I assume that at some point a list of every website you've ever visited will be required as part of an interview as well.
Get used to it, this is you're life, this is your future. You will conform and you will supply all the information that's asked for. You'll turn over every single piece of information about your life and convince yourself that it's really not all that bad.
For doing this, you'll get a reasonably well paying job and a lot of false security. It's a win win deal.

a drug test is about me and me only. asking for my facebook login or to look at my facebook page would share private information of people other than myself.

i will not get use to it and it is not the future. by your thought process its ok for them to ask me for my gmail login and to view the FF history on my laptop. fuck that.

fyi i do not have a facebook account and will never ever get one.
 
Last edited:

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
This thread has inspired me to finally delete all those social media sites I never use, G+, facebook, etc all gone.
 

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
Employees should never use social network to revel work problems, company secret, or make fun of co-workers, complain and demonize co-workers. If someone is found violating that principle, there should be ways for independent party to verify the complain/violation, and for companies to take action.

No. Flat out.

If I want to bitch about my coworkers OFF the clock then I have every right to do so and the company can't do jack fucking shit, and it better stay that way.
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
No. Flat out.

If I want to bitch about my coworkers OFF the clock then I have every right to do so and the company can't do jack fucking shit, and it better stay that way.

A lot of schools have moral clauses in their teacher contracts and I think things like this are already covered in those clauses. I know our teachers can even be punished for acting inappropriately outside of work. We have had a few spotted at clubs doing inappropriate things (smoking pot, showing their tits, etc...) by coworkers and it was enough to bring disciplinary action to them.

So really, it all depends on what you signed up for when you took the job.
 

darkewaffle

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2005
8,152
1
81
Stupid but I get where the school is coming from. It's easy to say it's her own time and what she does with it is her own business, but turn that around and look at how much negative press organizations suffer from poor employee behavior off the clock and how visible that sort of thing is through Facebook and internet media. Customers want to feel like their bankers, teachers, legislators, and corporate execs are conservative business people. When they're 'caught' being human it becomes a PR disaster for both employee and organization.
 

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
A lot of schools have moral clauses in their teacher contracts and I think things like this are already covered in those clauses. I know our teachers can even be punished for acting inappropriately outside of work. We have had a few spotted at clubs doing inappropriate things (smoking pot, showing their tits, etc...) by coworkers and it was enough to bring disciplinary action to them.

So really, it all depends on what you signed up for when you took the job.

That makes sense I suppose, but normal jobs where you don't interact with children don't and shouldn't have such rules.

Note: I'm not commenting on the OP article, just social networking posts in general.
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
That makes sense I suppose, but normal jobs where you don't interact with children don't and shouldn't have such rules.

Note: I'm not commenting on the OP article, just social networking posts in general.

I agree.

I just fear that because of how quickly social networking spreads, and how you are basically searchable based on your employer in some cases that more and more companies might start enacting clauses like this to avoid their interoffice gossip/drama from leaking out into the public.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
My general feelings on this issue:
1. I think we all realize that stuff that goes online has the possibility of being seen by anyone. That said, Facebook has privacy controls for a reason. We put stuff out there expecting that only the people we've allowed will see it. Honestly, this isn't much different from getting together with your friends and talking - you have the expectation of privacy in both situations. We would find it ludicrous if your employer asked for the contact info of all of your friends for personal relationship interviews. That said, don't put dumb crap on Facebook. There's always the possibility that:
a. Your friends will somehow publicize it
b. Facebook will change their privacy policies
c. You will screw up your own privacy settings
d. You will friend someone in a year and not remember that rant about your boss from today

2. Employers should never ask you for a password to ANYTHING. Even your own accounts on their network. For their accounts, that's just terrible security practice. For your accounts, that's just terrible privacy violations and security practice on your part.

3. I understand that employers need to protect their image and they don't want customers finding your rants about the company or compromising pictures/messages online. I agree with them. There are better ways to handle this. Talk to your employees about this. Make sure they understand how important this is to you, that they may be fired if something is reported to them, and how to properly lock down the privacy of their accounts.

4. This really should be illegal in hiring. If you've properly secured your account, an employer won't even be able to find you on Facebook. If they then ask for your login info, they have the ability to bypass many of the interview no-no questions, like whether you're married, have kids, are gay, have a car, practice a certain religion, follow a political persuasion, etc.
 

SillyOReilly

Golden Member
Aug 11, 2007
1,535
6
81
Anyone that wants to allow an employer to do whatever they like, have the interviewer come to your house and fuck your wife. If she does a good job you're hired.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Stupid but I get where the school is coming from. It's easy to say it's her own time and what she does with it is her own business, but turn that around and look at how much negative press organizations suffer from poor employee behavior off the clock and how visible that sort of thing is through Facebook and internet media. Customers want to feel like their bankers, teachers, legislators, and corporate execs are conservative business people. When they're 'caught' being human it becomes a PR disaster for both employee and organization.

You can't say that it's "her own time" anyway, well, at least not with teachers (this was just a teacher's aide.) Like it or not, teachers are held to a higher standard 24/7; not just while they're working.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
You can't say that it's "her own time" anyway, well, at least not with teachers (this was just a teacher's aide.) Like it or not, teachers are held to a higher standard 24/7; not just while they're working.

I agree, but, at the same time, they do not give up all their privacy to take a job as a teacher (or aide).

The school should just have obtained the information they needed from the complaining parent (who, of course, would be more than happy to show her FB page to the administrators or hand over her password, right?).

MotionMan
 

CountZero

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2001
1,796
36
86
I guess I don't get the school's perspective here.

A parent complains about an inappropriate picture, presumably they passed on the picture (or they are a moron, a distinct possibility). So now the school has a few options:

1) The picture is grounds for termination, fire the aide.
2) The picture could be part of a larger set involving something illegal, call the cops, get a warrant, have at it.
3) The picture is a grey area for termination, fire the aide and risk maybe issues with the aide/union.
4) The picture is a grey area for termination, bring them in and have them share their private info and if you find more grey area pictures fire them, if you don't find more then maybe fire them maybe don't (not sure what the gain here is). If they don't share then fire them and almost guarantee issues with the aide/union.
5) The picture is fine, the parent is just another busy body. A little admin leave and back they come.

Option 4 is the one with the least likelihood of a good outcome and yet that's what they did. Makes zero sense. I'm willing to bet it is fairly easy to get a warrant in the case of illicit pictures from a teacher and then you can get access to all that private stuff you want no problem. Instead the school took a shortcut that had no possible gain for them just firing her for the photo would have been a better move.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
No. Flat out.

If I want to bitch about my coworkers OFF the clock then I have every right to do so and the company can't do jack fucking shit, and it better stay that way.

It's not about off the clock or not, it's about who your FB friends are and who knows about your bitching. If your friends are just a few close personal/family friend, no coworker, no big network of friend of friends who may be connected to work....etc, then go bitch away. But otherwise it's not much different than going on public tv and bitch about your coworker where your boss, other coworkers, general public would find out. Your coworker could easily sue you for damage of reputation. Your boss could fire your ass for damaging work relationship.

The problem with social network is what you say/post can have little or big impact depending on how many people you are connected to, not like email which is for your eyes only. If your employer would know about you saying $hit, you are connected to way too many people to be talking crap in your social network account.
 

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
It's not about off the clock or not, it's about who your FB friends are and who knows about your bitching. If your friends are just a few close personal/family friend, no coworker, no big network of friend of friends who may be connected to work....etc, then go bitch away. But otherwise it's not much different than going on public tv and bitch about your coworker where your boss, other coworkers, general public would find out. Your coworker could easily sue you for damage of reputation. Your boss could fire your ass for damaging work relationship.

The problem with social network is what you say/post can have little or big impact depending on how many people you are connected to, not like email which is for your eyes only. If your employer would know about you saying $hit, you are connected to way too many people to be talking crap in your social network account.

I'm not worried:

http://www.inc.com/news/articles/20...-cannot-be-fired-for-facebook-complaints.html

In fact, I'll complain about some coworkers tonight and we can see what happens
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
She was made to read the newspaper until the end of the day?

What kind of people was she working for? Out with the old, in with the new. It's 2012 and we don't need people behind the times running things.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |