Originally posted by: Creig
Originally posted by: Rollo
Creig is just so used to promises and no product from ATI that he posts their promises as things that have actually happened!
Once again Rollo revises quotes to match what he wants to see. Please point out where I said something has "actually happened" that hasn't.
Did He edit it out, From where his quote started did he skip over part and continue later like nothing was missing. He found in the
CONCLUSION of the article where they stated which playback they prefered. He didn't cut any thing out he just started with and ended with the part of the conclusion where they cover which of the ones they tested, they thought was better.
For some reason you think that Rollo should have included the part where the
SPECULATE on future changes. Thats not what a quote is. A quote is just a part of what somebody says not all of it. Thats what the link is for, so unless you can't read (sorry if you can't) you should easily be able to cover all of the information including the part where they SPECULATE on the future.
You did imply that Picture quality on DVD and MPEG2 Play back was judged but not benchmarked in part of the discusion on what ATI intended to do. He may have stretched it, but you have attempted to blast him for being BIASED by stating Firingsquads determination (of tested types) between ATI and NVIDIA. If anyone is BIASED it is Firingsquad because it is what they said not him.