SiliconWars
Platinum Member
- Dec 29, 2012
- 2,346
- 0
- 0
No? When the former marketing team touted Bulldozer as *THE* chip for the server market, and three years ago the new marketing team comes in front of an investor audience and tells world + dog that ARM is better than x86 for servers, how do you interpret that? That Bulldozer was a huge success?
Nobody says Bulldozer was a "huge success".
8150 vs 1100T BE - http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/434?vs=203
When talking about advancements, Bulldozer was an advance on AMD's flagship at the time not a step backwards.
In the interests of fairness I'll be the first to admit that it wasn't much of an advance! It still was not a step backwards.
Last edited: