Fixed.Things will improve. Second, 8800 SLI in anything is really bad right now.
Sorry, but when I pay as much as two G80's cost, I'd like to use AA levels that are higher than what the single cards offer.
Fixed.Things will improve. Second, 8800 SLI in anything is really bad right now.
Originally posted by: josh6079
Fixed.Things will improve. Second, 8800 SLI in anything is really bad right now.
Sorry, but when I pay as much as two G80's cost, I'd like to use AA levels that are higher than what the single cards offer.
Originally posted by: terentenet
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
Originally posted by: StopSign
Doesn't work. Upload it to Imageshack.Originally posted by: JonnyBlaze
To be fair look at the image quality: http://uploader.ws/upload/200701/crysis_dx10.jpg
gotta use IE
That image is not in game. Notice the purple fringing in the upper right corner. Now don't tell me that dx10 games will emulate lens specific chromatic aberrations. That's bull.
Originally posted by: zodder
Hmmm, the decision to stick with AGP for awhile longer seems like a good plan now.
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: zodder
Hmmm, the decision to stick with AGP for awhile longer seems like a good plan now.
36.8 FPS avg at 1280x1024 on 8800GTX SLI makes the decision to buy my Xbox360 + 50" HDTV look like the decision of a lifetime.
Originally posted by: Brian48
Well, this is all early yet. Remember the leaked Doom Alpha that ran like a dog even on a 9700Pro, which was the "new on the streets" primo graphics card at the time?
Originally posted by: DeathReborn
Few flaws in the "benches":
1: SLI is currently not usable in Vista
2: PhysX is not supported by Crysis (it has a track record of lowering fps anyway)
So i'm gonna say shens.
Originally posted by: enz660hp
Originally posted by: DeathReborn
Few flaws in the "benches":
1: SLI is currently not usable in Vista
2: PhysX is not supported by Crysis (it has a track record of lowering fps anyway)
So i'm gonna say shens.
yup, I was watching an interview and they stated that teh game does NOT support physics cards. Also...the vista SLi is impossible at this point. Also, they are using 4 gigs of ram, which would decrease the performance by roughly 5% becuase of 4 sticks instead of two. Other than that, may god have mercy on us all...this game looks like the next oblivion as far as eye candy goes & performance.
Originally posted by: Jibboom
No Crysis for me any time soon then
Surely there will be some improvements though - it's not often you get a game that the best graphics card out can't run well.
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
The links here to teh screenshots said "un-authorized referer". In any case, I went to gamershell to see screenshots and although they are somewhat impressive, I find games still look cartoonish. I just hope UT2007, now named UT3 will be better. Of course, I don't want to upgrade my CPU and RAM now, just my video card so I hope the next ATIs will make the grade.
Originally posted by: soydios
I call shens. SLi in Vista? Havok on PhysX?
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: soydios
I call shens. SLi in Vista? Havok on PhysX?
It is my understanding that Havok is not involved in Crysis.
PhysX is the engine in use.
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Maybe the game being delayed is a good thing, because the current top of the line videocard is barely good enough.
Originally posted by: sbuckler
I suspect the demo's everyone has seen were DX9 on XP. DX10 on vista is bound to be buggy and unoptimised both for nvidia drivers (even without SLi), MS code for DX10, and the DX10 path in crysis (they will have been working more on the DX9 path for the demos). Come back in 6 months once it's all fixed up and I'm sure the benches will be quite different.
Originally posted by: ShadowOfMyself
Hmm why the hell do they test 1024x768, 1280x1024 and suddenly go to 2560 skipping 1600 etc? weird to say the least.. anyway thats bullshit.. either that or the 8800 is another nv30 (nv30 was great at dx8 and sucked at dx9)