- Jul 20, 2006
- 38
- 0
- 0
Hi everyone,
I just recently upgraded from a 1.8GHz Celeron (ugh) to a 3.0GHz 631 P4 (Cedar Mill), what a difference.
My BIOS lets me edit the clock speed, and default is 200mhz (200 x 15 = 3.0ghz). I set it to 220mhz, which is 3.3Ghz...I'm using a stock intel HSF, which cools pretty well I guess. I'm using a trial version of Hardware sensors monitor 4.2 (is there any freeware app for this type of stuff?), and it says my CPU's temp is around 27°/28°C, which is good (I think?), and when I'm encoding video it shoots up to around 38°/39°C.
I was wondering if it's safe to overclock from 3.0 to 3.3 with the stock HSF? I've read a lot about the Cedar Mill cores and I've learned they run cooler than most other cores, but I was just wondering and being cautious.
I know you'll probably laugh at me, and that's fine, heh. I think I'm going to restart and go into the BIOS and change it back to the default 200mhz clock until I get an answer.
Thanks!
Nate
I just recently upgraded from a 1.8GHz Celeron (ugh) to a 3.0GHz 631 P4 (Cedar Mill), what a difference.
My BIOS lets me edit the clock speed, and default is 200mhz (200 x 15 = 3.0ghz). I set it to 220mhz, which is 3.3Ghz...I'm using a stock intel HSF, which cools pretty well I guess. I'm using a trial version of Hardware sensors monitor 4.2 (is there any freeware app for this type of stuff?), and it says my CPU's temp is around 27°/28°C, which is good (I think?), and when I'm encoding video it shoots up to around 38°/39°C.
I was wondering if it's safe to overclock from 3.0 to 3.3 with the stock HSF? I've read a lot about the Cedar Mill cores and I've learned they run cooler than most other cores, but I was just wondering and being cautious.
I know you'll probably laugh at me, and that's fine, heh. I think I'm going to restart and go into the BIOS and change it back to the default 200mhz clock until I get an answer.
Thanks!
Nate