Hecubus2000
Senior member
- Dec 1, 2000
- 674
- 0
- 0
All this mess about wanting to be equal. What a joke. They could have used that money to help children that really need it.
Originally posted by: Wag
How can it be a privately funded public school?
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
If it's restricted to homosexuals only, it's not a public highschool. It's a private highschool. And if it's not restricted to homosexuals-only, then it's nothing more than a public highschool just like every other public highschool out there.
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: notfred
The school is an expansion of a two-classroom public school program that began in 1984. A gay-rights youth advocacy group, the Hetrick-Martin Institute, has managed and financed the program since its inception.
Doesn't look like the government is paying for it.
Right. It's not a public highschool. Gay rights? Like a homosexual has any more rights than anyone else? :| :| :| :| :| :| :|
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Yet they would scream if we opened an all straight high school.
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Ameesh
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I see a definite problem in legislating social interaction. What's next Gay libraries, Gay museums, Gay utilities, gay subways. The public good is the good of all the public, not just the gay public. Not only is it a disservice to the gay students it is as well a terrible disservice to the straight ones. It is not up to a city government to step in and seperate fighting children, that should be being done through the intervention of the community.
Again, this is the place of a private institution. NOT!!! a government. It would also be fine for the government to allow grants to children to go to the private institution...
I'm probably getting all worked up over nothing. .... As others have pointed out it's apparently privately funded. I guess I need more information.
Originally posted by: Ameesh
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Ameesh
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I see a definite problem in legislating social interaction. What's next Gay libraries, Gay museums, Gay utilities, gay subways. The public good is the good of all the public, not just the gay public. Not only is it a disservice to the gay students it is as well a terrible disservice to the straight ones. It is not up to a city government to step in and seperate fighting children, that should be being done through the intervention of the community.
Again, this is the place of a private institution. NOT!!! a government. It would also be fine for the government to allow grants to children to go to the private institution...
I'm probably getting all worked up over nothing. .... As others have pointed out it's apparently privately funded. I guess I need more information.
i didnt see any where in the article that straights wouldn't be allowed to attend if they want to. What would you say about schools for gifted children or children who dont speak english, or retarded kids? they are all specialized groups that dont do well in normal public schools, they all have special programs or entirely seperate schools available to them.
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: notfred
The school is an expansion of a two-classroom public school program that began in 1984. A gay-rights youth advocacy group, the Hetrick-Martin Institute, has managed and financed the program since its inception.
Doesn't look like the government is paying for it.
Right. It's not a public highschool. Gay rights? Like a homosexual has any more rights than anyone else? :| :| :| :| :| :| :|
They have a right not to be harassed or beaten by narrow-minded moralizing pinheads like you.
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: notfred
The school is an expansion of a two-classroom public school program that began in 1984. A gay-rights youth advocacy group, the Hetrick-Martin Institute, has managed and financed the program since its inception.
Doesn't look like the government is paying for it.
Right. It's not a public highschool. Gay rights? Like a homosexual has any more rights than anyone else? :| :| :| :| :| :| :|
They have a right not to be harassed or beaten by narrow-minded moralizing pinheads like you.
Originally posted by: Judgement
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Yet they would scream if we opened an all straight high school.
I was thinking the same exact thing. Why are homosexuals being given benefits the rest of us arent? How is this any different then if someone opened a white only, or male only, or straight only HS... which undoubtedly would catch major heat for doing so. I'm sure there would be protests, people would be trying to sue... people who didn't fit in with the crowd attending the school would try to get in.
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I understand its not easy for some of them, but isn't that a better social education then what they would get at all all homosexual school? Wouldn't that just be softening them up for a blow when they enter the real world? To me the better social education would be to accept their sexual preference, suck it up and learn to live with it in a diverse society where no one has the same preferences. Show them their choice to have a same sex partner should have no impact on their interactions with straight people, and that it should have absolutely no influence on their ability to get an education?
Originally posted by: Ameesh
i didnt see any where in the article that straights wouldn't be allowed to attend if they want to. What would you say about schools for gifted children or children who dont speak english, or retarded kids? they are all specialized groups that dont do well in normal public schools, they all have special programs or entirely seperate schools available to them.
Those conditions are not sexual preference and that's the difference. Minority students don't do well either, are you encouraging segregation?
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Judgement
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Yet they would scream if we opened an all straight high school.
I was thinking the same exact thing. Why are homosexuals being given benefits the rest of us arent? How is this any different then if someone opened a white only, or male only, or straight only HS... which undoubtedly would catch major heat for doing so. I'm sure there would be protests, people would be trying to sue... people who didn't fit in with the crowd attending the school would try to get in.
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I understand its not easy for some of them, but isn't that a better social education then what they would get at all all homosexual school? Wouldn't that just be softening them up for a blow when they enter the real world? To me the better social education would be to accept their sexual preference, suck it up and learn to live with it in a diverse society where no one has the same preferences. Show them their choice to have a same sex partner should have no impact on their interactions with straight people, and that it should have absolutely no influence on their ability to get an education?
Unfortunately, many people don't have such an enlightened attitude towards gays. If they want to have a safe environment in which they're not going to be harassed by straight students and they can associate with other gays, then I'm all for it.
I'm not gay myself, but I got picked on mercilessly in school for being no more than being a geek with glasses and a hearing problem. I would have gladly attended a separate school for people like myself if it had meant I could learn in a safe environment.
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Ameesh
i didnt see any where in the article that straights wouldn't be allowed to attend if they want to. What would you say about schools for gifted children or children who dont speak english, or retarded kids? they are all specialized groups that dont do well in normal public schools, they all have special programs or entirely seperate schools available to them.
Those conditions are not sexual preference and that's the difference. Minority students don't do well either, are you encouraging segregation?
I don't believe in students who don't speak English -either learn the society's primary language or stay out of society. "Retarded" kids need different levels of attention because of a physical abnormality, which is fine. I used to work with the Special Ed kids for a few months when I was in grade-school.
Homosexuals do NOT NEED SPECIAL PROGRAMS. They are NO DIFFERENT than you and I, other than their lifestyle choice.
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Judgement
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Yet they would scream if we opened an all straight high school.
I was thinking the same exact thing. Why are homosexuals being given benefits the rest of us arent? How is this any different then if someone opened a white only, or male only, or straight only HS... which undoubtedly would catch major heat for doing so. I'm sure there would be protests, people would be trying to sue... people who didn't fit in with the crowd attending the school would try to get in.
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I understand its not easy for some of them, but isn't that a better social education then what they would get at all all homosexual school? Wouldn't that just be softening them up for a blow when they enter the real world? To me the better social education would be to accept their sexual preference, suck it up and learn to live with it in a diverse society where no one has the same preferences. Show them their choice to have a same sex partner should have no impact on their interactions with straight people, and that it should have absolutely no influence on their ability to get an education?
Unfortunately, many people don't have such an enlightened attitude towards gays. If they want to have a safe environment in which they're not going to be harassed by straight students and they can associate with other gays, then I'm all for it.
I'm not gay myself, but I got picked on mercilessly in school for being no more than being a geek with glasses and a hearing problem. I would have gladly attended a separate school for people like myself if it had meant I could learn in a safe environment.
Yes and in a perfect world there would be a special school for fat kids, for kids with pimple, kids in the band, etc. Unfortunately this is the real world, where we do have to put up with this sh!t. I was picked on as well, but I can't honestly say that I need my own school. This is life, kids are assholes, deal with it.
Originally posted by: UglyCassanova
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Judgement
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Yet they would scream if we opened an all straight high school.
I was thinking the same exact thing. Why are homosexuals being given benefits the rest of us arent? How is this any different then if someone opened a white only, or male only, or straight only HS... which undoubtedly would catch major heat for doing so. I'm sure there would be protests, people would be trying to sue... people who didn't fit in with the crowd attending the school would try to get in.
if there is enough students who are going to attend, i dont see a problem with it, and the point about there being gay math is idiotic, if you think that school is just there for academics you are stupid, a very valuable social education is gained in school too. gays, trannys and such probably have a terrible time in school from the social aspect of it, if they can do better in a school where homophobs cant bother them then i dont see the problem.
I understand its not easy for some of them, but isn't that a better social education then what they would get at all all homosexual school? Wouldn't that just be softening them up for a blow when they enter the real world? To me the better social education would be to accept their sexual preference, suck it up and learn to live with it in a diverse society where no one has the same preferences. Show them their choice to have a same sex partner should have no impact on their interactions with straight people, and that it should have absolutely no influence on their ability to get an education?
Unfortunately, many people don't have such an enlightened attitude towards gays. If they want to have a safe environment in which they're not going to be harassed by straight students and they can associate with other gays, then I'm all for it.
I'm not gay myself, but I got picked on mercilessly in school for being no more than being a geek with glasses and a hearing problem. I would have gladly attended a separate school for people like myself if it had meant I could learn in a safe environment.
Yes and in a perfect world there would be a special school for fat kids, for kids with pimple, kids in the band, etc. Unfortunately this is the real world, where we do have to put up with this sh!t. I was picked on as well, but I can't honestly say that I need my own school. This is life, kids are assholes, deal with it.
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
It's not the government's fault. This is a private school, funded by private parties. The government has nothing to do with it.
Originally posted by: kranky
Many people of high school age don't even know if they are gay or not. Many 15-17 year olds experiment.