- Sep 15, 2008
- 5,044
- 184
- 116
Yes.Did Adobe start using the ridiculous version scheme that Chrome and Firefox employ?
Is Linux getting this version?
something odd in Pale Moon:
It shows both flash 12 and 13 in the plug-ins list.
Odd. I only see one. You probably will have to uninstall it completely and reinstall.
FYI 13.0.0.201 was recently released
flash player 12 on firefox was pretty slow I've found. Hopefully this fixes it...
And Flash still sucks...getting crashes all the time when I play anything online that uses Flash.
I didn't install the initial version, but I can confirm the updated version I installed today works fine on my Mavericks Core i7 iMac.The Mac update fixes the plug-in failure error with the earlier 13.x version that I mentioned above.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1447282
The Windows version was not affected and not updated since the initial version 13 release.
Holy hell, it seems like since 12 there have been five or six updates to address 0-day exploits making it more vulnerable than Java and at least JRE has a built-in whitelist now. This coincides with the uptick in infections I've had to clean up since January.13.0.0.206 was just released, FYI...
Zero-day Flash bug under active attack in Windows threatens OS X, Linux too
http://arstechnica.com/security/201...-under-active-attack-threatens-os-x-linux-too