Why would that happen?Do you think people would quietly and passively just accept it if we restricted other constitutional rights? Say if we repealed the 1A then outlawed Islam, how would that go over? Or repealed the 13th and 14th and formalized the exploitative relationship employers have with illegal aliens and just declare them slaves?
False choice. We don't have to address only one thing. We can address all the things. In this thread, we're addressing 2A.No matter how the anti-2A'ers slice it, at the end of the day guns cause significantly less harm, a lower body count, than other liberties that do less good for society. When looking at our rights vs. risk, it is a very difficult sell saying we need more gun restrictions. Anti-2A'ers simply lose the logic test here.
Where are you getting these numbers?Guns are not used in crimes more often than not. There are 100,000,000 gun owners with 300,000,000 guns. I highly doubt a majority of those guns will be used in a crime today, this year, this decade. There are millions of people carrying their gun every day that are not using them for a crime, but are using them exactly 100% to their lawful objective.
See how fu*king ugly you are? Everything you support stems from you being a shitty person. Everything you're against stems from you being a shitty person.Do you think people would quietly and passively just accept it if we restricted other constitutional rights? Say if we repealed the 1A then outlawed Islam, how would that go over? Or repealed the 13th and 14th and formalized the exploitative relationship employers have with illegal aliens and just declare them slaves?
False choice. We don't have to address only one thing. We can address all the things. In this thread, we're addressing 2A.
Maybe you need a software upgrade to handle such complexity.
No, you're a cancer to America.If most of overly left anti-2A AT P&N (generally speaking) is laughing at me in regards to my comments on guns, then I'm very likely saying things that are good for America. Good cheerleading attempt, though.
Also, since this thread started with yet another tragic mass shooting, let's disarm dems in general. If you look at the profiles of the mass shootings over the last 10-odd years, pretty much the only stand-out non lib was that racist bastard Dylann Roof.
Your translation program is failing. Get that upgrade.Then you're holding guns to a standard you hold no other right or liberty too, despite them causing far less harm to society. You are using your personal preferences of what you like / dislike, not a fair measuring stick.
Where are you getting these numbers?
Yes! Because crazy disgusting people interpret 2A as license to be gun toting insane and stupid all at once.Is it ok to rape the 2A because the 4A has been abused?
No, you're a cancer to America.
Yes, you would have my position correct. I also contend that we can preserve the the right of the people to keep and bear Arms while still restricting what arms are allowed and maintaining sensible regulations on when those arms are allowed to be beared. In fact we already all agree to that. No one thinks that it is the right of a citizen to own an atomic weapon, or open carry on an airline or in a courtroom, so we are just talking about the specifics here.
Doesn't change that you're a cancer.A handful of you guys get so petty when you're wrong and have nothing.
Doesn't change that you're a cancer.
You're being met with only what is equal to what you bring.A handful of you guys get so petty when you're wrong and have nothing.
Bullshit. I rarely see anyone taking about getting rid of all guns. That's a lie gun nuts and the NRA tell.most gun owners are open to discussion, and even some more restrictions
the problem is no matter what we suggest, all we get it
"its not enough! ban them all!"
once ant's are open to a logical discussion, we can continue
You argue for senseless killing. That makes you a disease.No, I am not. If anything I argue for our freedoms to remain intact.
yet in this thread its been stated, as well as a call to cull gun ownersBullshit. I rarely see anyone taking about getting rid of all guns. That's a lie gun nuts and the NRA tell.
You're being met with only what is equal to what you bring.
You argue for senseless killing. That makes you a disease.
You argue for senseless killing. That makes you a disease.
Just to get you to understand, how many out of the 330,000,000 in the country are adults?What's funny is that in the very recent past when someone would go to Google and type in, "how many gun owners in America" it'd give you a big 100,000,000. Now they push all that down and moved to the top more anti-gun owner articles. Funny.
Anyway, here:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ricans-own-guns-but-just-how-many-is-unclear/
37% of 330,000,000 = 120,000,000+ gun owners.
I think that 100,000,000+ gun owners and ~300,000,000 guns are quite commonly accepted numbers.
Sorry but couldn't the same be said of anyone who supports alcohol being legal?