I encourage anyone and everyone to compare your posts to mine and then let me know who is offering a discussion on the topic of this thread and who wants to talk about anything but.
I encourage anyone and everyone to compare your posts to mine and then let me know who is offering a discussion on the topic of this thread and who wants to talk about anything but.Right, look at your posts, Younigue's posts, and my posts. You're both full of insults and passive aggressive comments that have no substance. I'm at least talking real numbers and explaining my pov. Anyway, carry on. Your piddly childish comments are the equivalent of thoughts and prayers.
Just to get you to understand, how many out of the 330,000,000 in the country are adults?
Then realize that out of that number you get 37% own guns, it’s not 100,000,000. It’s 37% of households, not population. How many in a household? It varies. Then 3% own 50% of the guns, that shrinks the number even more. Understand?
Sorry but couldn't the same be said of anyone who supports alcohol being legal?
Not really. We tried banning alcohol and the cure was worse than the disease. Other countries have been highly effective in banning guns, which indicates the same does not hold true for guns. As always, just really a utility function here that guns fail on.
No. Alcohol's main function isn't to kill.Sorry but couldn't the same be said of anyone who supports alcohol being legal?
Neither of those back up your claim.I don't think this is a point of contention with anyone. Gun ownership in America is somewhere around ~100,000,000 people.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/one-three-americans-own-guns-culture-factor-study-finds-n384031
https://qz.com/1095899/gun-ownership-in-america-in-three-charts/
Where are you getting these numbers?
Well they can be "culled" in ways they don't involve violence but 2A nuts are incapable of rising with out their guns because they are a disease.yet in this thread its been stated, as well as a call to cull gun owners
Was the cure really worse than the disease? Today alcohol kills 88,000 people a year. I wonder if prohibition would lower that today?
And for the record, I am in no way arguing for further restrictions of alcohol (or guns).
You bring nothing of value to the table. Your mind and soul are tainted and you believe conversations can be had from your starting point. Nah brah, get you some decency then try again.Right, look at your posts, Younigue's posts, and my posts. You're both full of insults and passive aggressive comments that have no substance. I'm at least talking real numbers and explaining my pov. Anyway, carry on. Your piddly childish comments are the equivalent of thoughts and prayers.
No.Quote me where I argue for senseless killing, please.
I was thinking that living in a house filled with junk food might be more dangerous. Guns don't tempt me but snacks and ice cream are another story.Living in a house with a gun increases your odds of death
https://www.vox.com/cards/gun-violence-facts/gun-house-death-risk
I don't think an assault weapon ban is a good or effective gun control policy, so if the discussion were if we should reauthorize that I would say no. Not only wasn't it effective, it gave a false impression of doing something.
Depression affects people differently, but it affects everyone at some point.Number of registered weapons in the U.S.
I was thinking that living in a house filled with junk food might be more dangerous. Guns don't tempt me but snacks and ice cream are another story.
Number of registered weapons in the U.S.
.
So what do you want then?
What I find particularly funny in this forum is that NRA members and pro-gun people are willing to talk about and make compromises to aid the safety of Americans, but the lefties and the anti-gun clueless in here refuse to make common sense decisions that will save lives. Instead they just spew hatred and lies and insanity. They act like rabid animals.most gun owners are open to discussion, and even some more restrictions
the problem is no matter what we suggest, all we get it
"its not enough! ban them all!"
once ant's are open to a logical discussion, we can continue
I know this is pointless but can you not see how someone could read the 2A and think they have a right to guns without infringement? I understand you don't agree, but can you not see the other side based on the wording?Yes! Because crazy disgusting people interpret 2A as license to be gun toting insane and stupid all at once.
Sounds like you are describing yourself.What I find particularly funny in this forum is that NRA members and pro-gun people are willing to talk about and make compromises to aid the safety of Americans, but the lefties and the anti-gun clueless in here refuse to make common sense decisions that will save lives. Instead they just spew hatred and lies and insanity. They act like rabid animals.
Your attempts to minimize and invalidate the history of right wing terrorism in this country is duly noted. Please educate yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_terrorism#United_States
Oh I can see it I just think that those who interpret it that way have small, weak, pathetic minds. They are ruled by fear, paranoia and insecurity. Those are definitely not the kind of people who should be heard in a gun debate.I know this is pointless but can you not see how someone could read the 2A and think they have a right to guns without infringement? I understand you don't agree, but can you not see the other side based on the wording?