Philippart
Golden Member
- Jul 9, 2006
- 1,290
- 0
- 0
As Zipspeed says, I am more in favor of a race where we maximize our crunching power in order to get the TeAm up the ranks. We could however do the member stats in terms of runtime or results. There is no direct relation between the 3 ways of scoring.To illustrate this look at this picture:
Name / Date registered / runtime / points / number of results
I have almost twice the runtime of Zipspeed and a lot more results, but in terms of points the difference is much lower
We just need to consider this for the more exotic ways to do the stats:
*if the criteria is runtime, it will favor old machines, or a maximum of cores or HT
*if the criteria is results, it will favor certain projects with small WUs, right now "sustainable water"
Name / Date registered / runtime / points / number of results
I have almost twice the runtime of Zipspeed and a lot more results, but in terms of points the difference is much lower
We just need to consider this for the more exotic ways to do the stats:
*if the criteria is runtime, it will favor old machines, or a maximum of cores or HT
*if the criteria is results, it will favor certain projects with small WUs, right now "sustainable water"