It seems close, yesAMD cards like Rx 480 are able to match GTX 1060 in what is supposed to be a game engine which favours Nvidia (Anvil Next)
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/For-H...t-Zeit-Dauer-Anmeldung-noch-moeglich-1219164/
People always seem to forget about the gtx980 and how well it overclocks.Well, 290X is edging out its direct (often costlier) competitors the 780 Ti and 970. In that sense, it's performing typically.
RX 480 > reference 290X (single digit % difference) isn't exactly unusual. Y
It's more that Fury X is actually making some use of those TFLOPs. This is Fiji exceptionalism more than Hawaii gimping. And that's good news to me, as it is rare to see indeed. 290X being within 20-30% of a Fury X in many games is actually the bad thing we've just gotten used to.
edit: PC Games Hardware has that typical 20-30% over the 390. Maybe GameGPU is an outlier. We'll need to see more, but either way Hawaii is fine.
Overclocking seems to have gone out of GPU comparison discussions perhaps because AMD cards don't overclock much at all released in the last 2 years.People always seem to forget about the gtx980 and how well it overclocks.
A properly clocked 980 will be mabe 10% slower than a gtx980ti.
Certainly in the ballpark of a Fury card.
Overclocking seems to have gone out of GPU comparison discussions perhaps because AMD cards don't overclock much at all released in the last 2 years.
Or maybe because most people don't OC anyway. Not to mention all forms of perf/watt get ignored on those OC results even though the power usage goes crazy when OCing.
The cards are boosting in the reviews, which is an auto OC. If Nvidia wanted higher results in the benchmarks maybe they should have higher factory clocks? Boost is already a nice bonus in benchmarks with limited time runs, just look at the 1070/1080 FE results where the throttling wasn't noticed in most reviews since the benchmark runs were under 5 minutes.
Most people talking on a forum about graphics cards don't overclock? Ya not buying that for a second.
Or maybe because most people don't OC anyway. Not to mention all forms of perf/watt get ignored on those OC results even though the power usage goes crazy when OCing.
The cards are boosting in the reviews, which is an auto OC. If Nvidia wanted higher results in the benchmarks maybe they should have higher factory clocks? Boost is already a nice bonus in benchmarks with limited time runs, just look at the 1070/1080 FE results where the throttling wasn't noticed in most reviews since the benchmark runs were under 5 minutes.
How can I unlike this post? Haha so bad.
Since the vast majority of Maxwell and Pascal cards don't need voltage adjustments to get near-max overclocks, power consumption only goes up linearly with the % to clock speed increases. GTX 1070 goes up by 20-25 watts (~15% increase in power consumption for 10-15% increase in FPS). 980 TI goes up by 50-65 watts (~20-30% power increase for 25% increase in FPS). Unlike RX 480 that needs voltage and has a 80-100 watt increase in power consumption (50-66% increase) for a 10% gain in performance.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9306/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-review/17
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/31
People on this forum overclock.... No wait, let me rephrase. People on this forum that buy cards capable overclocking overclock.
Finally, let’s see the cost of overclocking in terms of power, temperature, and noise. For the GTX 1080FE, the power cost at the wall proves to be rather significant.
You have to have an agenda to downplay Nvidia ocing currently. I'm an amd user and I have no intention of switching to Nvidia fully in future (maybe an Nvidia rig for some moba gaming) but that's the first thing I tell all my friends to do is oc their Nvidia cards.How can I unlike this post? Haha so bad.
Since the vast majority of Maxwell and Pascal cards don't need voltage adjustments to get near-max overclocks, power consumption only goes up linearly with the % to clock speed increases. GTX 1070 goes up by 20-25 watts (~15% increase in power consumption for 10-15% increase in FPS). 980 TI goes up by 50-65 watts (~20-30% power increase for 25% increase in FPS). Unlike RX 480 that needs voltage and has a 80-100 watt increase in power consumption (50-66% increase) for a 10% gain in performance.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9306/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-review/17
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/31
People on this forum overclock.... No wait, let me rephrase. People on this forum that buy cards capable overclocking overclock.
This is the latest video for some people who thinks that Fury X OC is competitive with GTX 980 Ti OC. AMD will never be competitive with nvidia in terms of OC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkE8mtVv_yg
U understood in a wrong way. What i am saying is that Fury X can never compete with a GTX 980 Ti when it comes to overclocking performance. This is the reason people are ready to spend 4 figures bucks on Nvidia card due to that they have miles better user experience compare to AMD. This is one of the reason why AMD is not a competition to Nvidia on high end GPUs.I don't think anyone has ever said that Fury can OC as well as a 980 Ti, not even Pascal can. The 980 Ti had very low clocks at launch which is why it OC's so well.
The only thing thats wrong is saying that there is no extra power consumption which is flat out wrong and has been proven so, and you just once again proved as well. It used ~23% more power (~100w for rest of system).
Can we please get this thread back on topic?. Go create another 980 TI OCing thread if you want to talk about it. This is supposed to be about For Honor Benchmarks. Its open beta this weekend so try it out and post some results.
U understood in a wrong way. What i am saying is that Fury X can never compete with a GTX 980 Ti when it comes to overclocking performance. This is the reason people are ready to spend 4 figures bucks on Nvidia card due to that they have miles better user experience compare to AMD. This is one of the reason why AMD is not a competition to Nvidia on high end GPUs.