They are using full system power not just GPU power alone.
perf/watt gets worse as you OC
And you talked about how its linear... completely wrong:
I'm not going to continue this discussion as its off topic. If you want to provide some OC results for For Honor along with the power consumption differences please do so.
The only thing thats wrong is saying that there is no extra power consumption
This is the latest video for some people who thinks that Fury X OC is competitive with GTX 980 Ti OC. AMD will never be competitive with nvidia in terms of OC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkE8mtVv_yg
AMD just has to pull another 7950. 800MHz card that could typically OC 33-50% (golden samples even higher). Or you're right and they can always do the Fury X, 1050MHz card that typically OC's to a lower MHz number than the 7950, never mind measuring in percentages. The company can make whatever decision they want, even if it's bone-headed (7950 at a low clock was idiotic, it just made the GTX 580, 660 Ti, and 670 seem better than they really were). But I will admit it's unlikely to see AMD OC more when they have the technological disadvantage (performance per mm^2, watt, TFLOP).
It seems more like a twist on fighting games than hack and slash. Not perfectly like Street Fighter obviously, but in the sense that you have moves with different properties and reading and reacting to your opponent is important. Some modes are like MOBAs, but still have the PvP fighting aspect.
You're missing that its an anomaly as both cards are about equal in most game review benches. You will always find a card (whether from NV or AMD) where in some odd game that it performs a little better vs other cards close to it.Ohh the 980 Ti is faster than a 1070 in a newer game, what I am missing here ? not that I am complaining of course
You missing that pcgameshardware testing aftermarket cards.Ohh the 980 Ti is faster than a 1070 in a newer game, what I am missing here ? not that I am complaining of course