WOW, Kepler is not just aging, it's literally pulling off FX5000 series DX9 performance in DX12 games. It's no longer a coincidence. Clearly, Kepler is just
bombing now; perfect timing for Kepler owners to jump ship to Pascal 1070/1080 before the entire Kepler line is worth almost nothing. 280X matching the OG Titan, R9 290 destroying 780Ti easily, and R9 290X beating 780Ti at 1440p by
37% is just incredible. Even the 960 4GB is matching a 780 -- insane. Another trend I highlighted since January 2015 -- 2GB VRAM cards are dead. I hope people on AT stock recommending 2GB cards for gaming outright.
Hawaii was only a 438mm2 chip and 780Ti was a 561mm2 chip. Given their die size differences and performance under DX12, for modern DX12 games, it's like 9800Pro vs. FX5900. This game also seems to LOVE pixel fill-rate as 290X beats 7970 by 65% @ 1440p.
Over the last 6 months, Hawaii has easily proven that objectively R9 290X will go down as the FAR better gaming chip than 780Ti was. 980 beats 290X by just 1 fps at 1440p. Impressive,
very impressive given that GCN continues to excel in basically every new DX12 game other than Rise of the Tomb Raider. Cannot wait to see the showdown of Pascal vs. Vega in 2017 to see the progress newer architectures make under DX12, given that well DX12 games are the future.
DX12, hence why Kepler isn't even on the map and even Maxwell is barely keeping up (i.e., 980 beats 290X by only 1 fps at 1440p). Yet another DX12 game where GCN shows its strength.
My gtx960 4gb overclocked is = to a gtx780ti?
I played this game with high settings, it ran very nice.
So in hindsight we can now safely say that HD7970/7970Ghz/R9 280X won the 680/770 generation and R9 290/290X won the 780/780Ti generation. No doubt about that anymore as far as objective performance goes for DX11/DX12 games overall and CF vs. SLI (7970Ghz/280X CF > 680/770 SLI, 290X CF > 780Ti SLI). Too bad most people picked the wrong horse over both of those generations.