Free DVD - Documentary on 9/11

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

airjrdn

Senior member
Mar 9, 2001
253
0
0
I don't think anybody has said that one didn't fly over. They just say one didn't hit the pentagon.

Check out loose change and see for yourself.
 

mav451

Senior member
Jan 31, 2006
626
0
76
Instead of getting political, why hasn't this investigation gone down to the numbers >> pure engineering. If engineers (civil/mechanical/FP/etc.) know and understand the necessary forces, temperature, stress and strain required for these events to happen, how come it hasn't come to light?

*and yes, I'm civil and any civil engineer goes through dynamics/mechanics/steel/concrete/etc. and physics courses; so millions across the nation could figure this out pretty quickly if given the #'s
 

wallsfd949

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2003
1,002
0
0
Wow... this has sure been some great discussion on how this is a hot deal...

Everyone missed my point (yet one extremely intelligent individual told me to shut the fvck up). This does not belong in "Hot Deals" This and all other propaganda on the left and on the right belongs in Politics & News. We have a forum for that stuff and people who are genuinely interested will go there. It's like the vacuum sales man who knocks on my door -> if I wanted a vaccum, I know where to find one.

If I - and the others that come for Hot Deals - wanted to see political discussion, I'd wrap my head in duct tape (so when it exploded, the pieces would be easier to gather up) and trodge over to P&N.

Please.. let's keep the politics out of hot deals and in P&N where they belong.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
Originally posted by: airjrdn
smoke was pouring out of the hole the airplane made

video shows the airplane hitting the building

there was a picture of one of the engines sitting on the street

did everyone just up and forget everything they saw that morning?

Had you watched a little additional footage, you would have found out that it wasn't anywhere near the size of engine that was supposedly on one of those planes. Representatives from the engine manufacturer confirmed that.

Do you still believe in Santa Clause too?

I love when sheeple blindly follow whatever they've been told without questioning it.

I'm not saying it was or was not a plane that hit the pentagon. I'm not saying it was or wasn't terrorist activity that lead to the whole thing. I'm just saying look at both sides before making up your mind.

you are hilarious. a super powerful conspiracy involving the heads of government wouldn't be able to procure the correct engines after orchestrating such a complex event? funny how vastly powerful conspirators always leave clues that only losers in beanie caps can find. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html



 

DemiGoddess

Member
Nov 26, 2001
150
0
0
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,425
8,388
126
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.

nice read
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.

(thanks to the OP, I'll be ordering one )


Actually, Popular Mechanics hasn't done much of anything.
I always laugh when someone posts about Popular Mechanics, though. Direct conflict of interest, just like the 911 Commission. Copy + pasted from someone else:



The Popular Mechanics propaganda machine:

Senior researcher , Benjamin Chertoff of the Popular Mechanics 911 debunking article is none other than first cousin of Michael Chertoff, our secretary of the department of Homeland Security.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/070305chertoffscousin.htm


So, how else is Popular Mechanics connected to our government?


***************************************************************************************************
'Popular Mechanics' & Other CIA Front Organizations
From (name edited out)
(email edited out)
2-11-5

I have just read Jim Hoffman's response to Popular Mechanics 9/11 article that tries to debunk the truth about 9/11 by the use of the 'straw man' tactic. Although everything in his response is quite correct and exposes the straw man for what it is, I feel Mr Hoffman was dealing with this particular issue at the wrong level. Approached from a different angle the article tells us who really was behind 9/11 and who is still desperately trying to cover it up. This is how it works:-


'Popular Mechanics' is published by the Hearst Corporation, proprietor (chairman of the board). George R. Hearst grandson of William Randolph Hearst, sometime would-be builder of large aeroplanes.
http://www.business-magazines.com/prd1350.php
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/hearst.asp
http://www.hearstcorp.com/biographies/corp_bio_hearst.html

The president and CEO of Hearst Corporation is one Victor F. Ganzi, since June 1st, 2002. Mr Ganzi is also an officer/director of the Hearst Foundation.

http://img64.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img64&image=ganzi20032bw1py.jpg



http://www.oaklandwib.org/Images/ImageUploads/F82200432537.pdf

A close look at the titles of the books on the shelf behind Mr Ganzi in the photo (GANZI_2003_2_BW.jpg) reveals that some part of Mr Ganzi's early career was spent working for the owners of the Atlantic City Boardwalk and associated hotels and casinos; sometime friends of a certain Mr Frank Sinatra, as I recall.

Victor F. Ganzi is on the board of directors of The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA), alongside Columba Bush, wife of Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, brother of George W. Bush, President of the USA and son of George H.W. Bush, former DG of the CIA.
http://www.nationalfamilies.org/prevention/casa.html


Victor F. Ganzi is a member of B.E.N.S. - "Business Executives for National Security" wherein we learn that "When it came time to evaluate In-Q-Tel, the CIA's innovative technology development enterprise, Congress turned to BENS"
In October 2002, B.E.N.S. received a "CIA Agency Seal Medallion" for its work on the In-Q-Tel program.

In-Q-Tel? It is described as "A new partnership between the CIA and the ?private sector?(my apostrophes),? making it a classic front for traditional fascism and other American-style old-fashioned family values
http://www.in-q-tel.org/

A look at the names involved in In-Q-Tel quickly reveals it as a front for Zionism Central.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/inqtel

So, we should all be most grateful to 'Popular Mechanics' and its new editor James Meigs for indirectly telling us who the real perpetrators of 9/11 were by its rather long-winded "blind 'em with science" attempt to suppress the truth of behalf of those perpetrators.

*************************************************************************************************


http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html
("PM claims that its article is backed up by these experts. However, the article is not footnoted, and cites only the persons whose listings are highlighted with background colors. Of those, only the ones highlighted in yellow argue against claims made by 911review.com)

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html

http://rense.com/general62/popp.htm

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html
 

KELBOY

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2002
3,062
0
0
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.


Yes you are so right...Popular machanics...I think the Journalists at Stuff did a debunking too...
I couldn't find the link....
I 'm totally convinced after that read....

How about the other shoe though...How do people ("Shoe Bombers") pull it off quite easily in fact and then Do absolutely nothing for years...well anything beyond use of a garage door opener...wow they really got lucky....

love it thanks for the link....

best place to hide something is right in front of your faces...


 

1ucid

Member
Mar 6, 2003
58
0
0
you liberals are all full of ******! <random republican bullshit> Praise jeebus.

Liblar Timmay!
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: KELBOY
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.


Yes you are so right...Popular machanics...I think the Journalists at Stuff did a debunking too...
I couldn't find the link....
I 'm totally convinced after that read....

How about the other shoe though...How do people ("Shoe Bombers") pull it off quite easily in fact and then Do absolutely nothing for years...well anything beyond use of a garage door opener...wow they really got lucky....

love it thanks for the link....

best place to hide something is right in front of your faces...

Popular mechanics hasn't dared tried to address the precollapse explosions at the World Trace Center. First link in my signature has them all.
Time frame 51:10 - 55:00

Also this... more pre-collapse explosions?:
http://www.mypetgoat.tv/video/Bomb_Montage.WMV
 

airjrdn

Senior member
Mar 9, 2001
253
0
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: airjrdn
smoke was pouring out of the hole the airplane made

video shows the airplane hitting the building

there was a picture of one of the engines sitting on the street

did everyone just up and forget everything they saw that morning?

Had you watched a little additional footage, you would have found out that it wasn't anywhere near the size of engine that was supposedly on one of those planes. Representatives from the engine manufacturer confirmed that.

Do you still believe in Santa Clause too?

I love when sheeple blindly follow whatever they've been told without questioning it.

I'm not saying it was or was not a plane that hit the pentagon. I'm not saying it was or wasn't terrorist activity that lead to the whole thing. I'm just saying look at both sides before making up your mind.

you are hilarious. a super powerful conspiracy involving the heads of government wouldn't be able to procure the correct engines after orchestrating such a complex event? funny how vastly powerful conspirators always leave clues that only losers in beanie caps can find. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html

And yet you still haven't watched it have you?
 

DemiGoddess

Member
Nov 26, 2001
150
0
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: KELBOY
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.


Yes you are so right...Popular machanics...I think the Journalists at Stuff did a debunking too...
I couldn't find the link....
I 'm totally convinced after that read....

How about the other shoe though...How do people ("Shoe Bombers") pull it off quite easily in fact and then Do absolutely nothing for years...well anything beyond use of a garage door opener...wow they really got lucky....

love it thanks for the link....

best place to hide something is right in front of your faces...

Popular mechanics hasn't dared tried to address the precollapse explosions at the World Trace Center. First link in my signature has them all.
Time frame 51:10 - 55:00

Also this... more pre-collapse explosions?:
http://www.mypetgoat.tv/video/Bomb_Montage.WMV


Put down the Koolaid, son. I mean really. Just the slightest bit of common sense is needed to debunk all that crap. If you can't see it, it is because you don't want to.

 

djspl

Member
Jan 21, 2005
85
0
0
Originally posted by: airjrdn
I'll admit I'm not convinced we ever went. If we were able to go there 40 years ago, how the hell come we have so much trouble attempting it now?

When was it that we have tried to get to the moon again and had trouble? I don't recall any failed moon landing attempts. Just because we go into space doesn't mean we want to stop by the moon and can't.
 

airjrdn

Senior member
Mar 9, 2001
253
0
0
Ok, forget the technical "it could/couldn't happen" stuff. Watch Loose Change, pay close attention to the money portions; where the building is insured and has a clause specifically for terrorist attacks, pay attention to the put options (stocks #'s), listen carefully to the financial things, and skip the rest. People can argue until they're blue in the face over what would/wouldn't bring the buildings down, but one can't dispute the money side of things.
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: KELBOY
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
All one has to do is consider the vast number of people it would require to pull something like this off ... and try to explain how not one of them has come forward, or even leaked irrefutable evidence to the public. Nor has anyone explained what happened to the dozens of people that were on the planes.

Popular Mechanics has already blown this load of crap sky high. Time to drop it. The horse is dead, putrefied and thoroughly beaten by now. Put away the tin-foil beanies and the koolaid before anyone puts an eye out ... or something.


Yes you are so right...Popular machanics...I think the Journalists at Stuff did a debunking too...
I couldn't find the link....
I 'm totally convinced after that read....

How about the other shoe though...How do people ("Shoe Bombers") pull it off quite easily in fact and then Do absolutely nothing for years...well anything beyond use of a garage door opener...wow they really got lucky....

love it thanks for the link....

best place to hide something is right in front of your faces...

Popular mechanics hasn't dared tried to address the precollapse explosions at the World Trace Center. First link in my signature has them all.
Time frame 51:10 - 55:00

Also this... more pre-collapse explosions?:
http://www.mypetgoat.tv/video/Bomb_Montage.WMV


Put down the Koolaid, son. I mean really. Just the slightest bit of common sense is needed to debunk all that crap. If you can't see it, it is because you don't want to.

Koolaid? The government hasn't even acknolwedged those explosions took place. Go ahead and debunk it...I'll laugh at your explanations, since the government refuses to address or acknowledge the issue. Go find a government study that has actually acknowledged those 3 huge explosions 15 seconds before the "collapse" of WTC1. Time frame 51:10 - 55:00

 

DemiGoddess

Member
Nov 26, 2001
150
0
0
A building with airliner jet fuel and a crashed airliner inside it ... explosions. Gee ... who'd a thunk it?

airjrdn ... Columbia and Challenger were not trying to reach the moon. Thanks for playing though. You get the boobie prize.

One doesn't need anything more than COMMON SENSE to debunk these tinfoil hat theories. Take yours off, put down the Koolaid and you will be able to see.

Geez ... conspiracy theories just crack me up at how transparent they are, and how easy they are to disprove. But seeing how many are so willing to blindly subscribe to them, JUST to be able to say we have an evil president or wicked administration, is truly plumbing the depths of human stupidity. Next you guys will be trying to convince us that Islam is a religion ... and one of peace. Ha ha ha!

 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
A building with airliner jet fuel and a crashed airliner inside it ... explosions. Gee ... who'd a thunk it?

Don't run away from the issue. Go find a government study that has acknowledged pre collapse explosions 15 seconds before WTC1 started its collapse. What's that? You can't find one because the government has pretended those pre collapse explosions never happened? Again, don't run away from this issue. Time frame 51:10 - 55:00. Also find a government study that accounts for the smoke rising up from the streets at the exact same time of those pre collapse explosions (smoke rising from the streets can be seen in the red boxed area).

Since you can't find a government report addressing those explosions mentioned above...how about the a government report addressing explosions many minutes before the collapses? http://www.mypetgoat.tv/video/Bomb_Montage.WMV.



You can't find an official report those explosions either? Ok, how about an official government report acknowledging the NYPD, NYFD, and FBI found secondary devices in the Twin Towers?

USA Today:
http://terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.truck.bombs.fbi.jack.kelley.rm

CNN:
http://media.putfile.com/911-WTC-Reporter-Secondary-Explosions-CNN-News

NBC:
http://media.putfile.com/911-WTC-Police-Found-Explosives-Rick-Sanchez


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=9%2F11+bomb
Fire fighter 1: "Here we go again"
Fire fighter 2: "Bomb in the building, start clearing out"
Background voices: "Get the f@#% out of here?secondary device..."

 

DemiGoddess

Member
Nov 26, 2001
150
0
0
Hello? There IS no issue to run away from! DUH!

Crashed airliner. Airliner jet fuel everywhere. Fire. Explosion? Gee ... I am SO shocked.

Get it now? The explosions were *part of* the whole mess of an airliner slamming into a building and jet fuel getting everywhere. One doesn't need to be a mechanical engineer to see the logic of this, one only needs common sense and no Koolaid in the system. Please, you are really stuck on stupid here, and it is making baby Jesus cry.

 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
You should go back and re-read my edited post Bombs were also found in the building. Funny how you can't seem to find ONE government study acknowledging pre collapse explosions.

Here's more for you to run away from:

William Rodriguez:
http://www.911proof.com/resources/innrodriguesisdnsept05snow.wmv

Explosion in the basement levels BEFORE the planes struck. William Rodriguez was the last person pulled from the rubble of the North Tower, and is national hero + international celebrity for his rescue efforts that day. He has also met with President Bush (Google William Rodriguez 9/11). He testified to the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors, but his accounts of basement explosions were ignored and intentionally omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report.
 

BrokenVisage

Lifer
Jan 29, 2005
24,770
12
81
Originally posted by: DemiGoddess
Hello? There IS no issue to run away from! DUH!

Crashed airliner. Airliner jet fuel everywhere. Fire. Explosion? Gee ... I am SO shocked.

Get it now? The explosions were *part of* the whole mess of an airliner slamming into a building and jet fuel getting everywhere. One doesn't need to be a mechanical engineer to see the logic of this, one only needs common sense and no Koolaid in the system. Please, you are really stuck on stupid here, and it is making baby Jesus cry.

Why not just watch the DVD so you can understand where he comes from?

I was once like you, I saw what happened on TV and of course I believed what they told me about the terrorists, passengers overtaking a plane and crashing it, and of course a plane flying into the Pentagon. Things didn't add up after the smoke cleared though.. invading Iraq for oil, installing a Bill of Rights crippling Patriot Act, and starting a war on terrorism but only focusing on the middle east. You need to get informed big time, open your mind like I did, just do a Google video search on Alex Jones and he'll give you all the documented evidence not being shown on TV. If not, then just keep believing what you 'feel' is true, while these people actually investigate and document it for us to make up our own mind with.
 

1ucid

Member
Mar 6, 2003
58
0
0
pmgwow nothing like this could ever happen, jeebus wouldn't allow it! Those pre-collapse explosions are a conspiracy placed by conspiraists! That is right, it is a conspiracy to create a conspiracy! Jeebus allows this kind of stuff. George Bush was elected via Divine Right!

Supastar!

If anyone has any kool-aid, let me know.
 

Ninjaneer

Member
Jul 6, 2005
59
0
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious
...<insert sounds of kittens dying>...

Just remember to charge your electric car, so you can have enough juice to swing by Michael Moore's place to pick up your emo glasses. You'll need them when you meet Kanye West for Boca burgers later on.

Argue this point all you want, but the truth of the matter is, I don't feel the need to devote my life to being an eDetective on the Federal Government. There is actual, factual tape of planes ramming the towers and real life witnesses of a low flying plane headed straight in to the Pentagon. But I'm the one with my head in the sand. That's fine, I'll devote my time to building a stable life for myself and my family and the conspiracy theorists can devote their time 'disproving' the news.
 

stelleg151

Senior member
Sep 2, 2004
822
0
0
Pretty handy we started a war out of the blue so that the fact that were not even looking for Bin Laden doesnt show up in the polls. Honestly, the republicans kept the white house because of 9/11, and they got immediate support to invade the largest oilfeilds left in the world to please their "investors".

To get around the checks and balances system and increase ones power, all that is required is skillfull deception and manipulation. I dont know why people have forgotten that rulers tend to try and gain as much power as they can. Ours is no different, but because the system put in place is reasonably well balanced, they have had to resort to extreme measures such as this.

Noone is claiming that the attacks didnt happen. All we are asking is that people attend to the overwhelming evidence for conspiracy. There are too many motivations and "coincidences" for me to brush it off, and I feel that anyone who cares about who is responsible for the victims of 9/11 should at least make the effort to look into it before brushing it off as conspiracy theory.

Oh and this most definately doesnt belong in Hot Deals.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |