FREE! New public Alchemy version Sveasoft firmware for Linksys WRT54G / WRT54GS wireless 802.11g router

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Devistater

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2001
3,180
0
0
Wow this thread I started a while back is still going. I'll try to read the stuff and post here a bit later on. But for now in case someone else didn't mention it there's a new Sveasoft public stable firmware (probably version 6, version 5.xx was for subscribers) going to come out shortly (I'd say in a month or so, hopefully Feb sometime) with a bunch of added features. Its in release candidate testing at the moment.

Client/Bridge mode for multiple clients
Adhoc mode
WDS/Repeater mode
WPA over WDS links
Web based wireless statistics
SNMP
Remote NTOP statistics
Captive portal
Extensive firewall enhancements
- track/block P2P, VoIP, IM, many other services by protocol
- 99% of available iptables filters included
VPN client and server (PPTP in all versions, IPsec as a compile-time option)
DHCP static IP assignment to specific MAC addresses
Wake-On-LAN functions with scheduling
OSPF routing
OSPF load balancing
Multi-level bandwidth management (Premium, Express, Standard, Bulk)
- manage P2P, VoIP, IM connections
- also by ports, IP addresses, and/or MAC addresses
Hardware QoS for the 4 LAN ports
Power boost to 251 mw
Afterburner Support (GS models)
SSH server and client
Telnet
Startup, firewall, and shutdown scripts
Safe backup and restore
VLAN support
Clone Wireless MAC
Reset router on upgrade

External Program Support

Wallwatcher
Firewall Builder
MRTG
Cactus
PRTG
Ntop

Some of these may overlap with the features listed in OP for 4.0
One of the more notable things is the 251mw power boost. Which is pretty high heh.
Another thing thats pretty cool is that the newer versions firewall builder have support for building rules for the linksys WRT54G/GS now. That means you can customize the firewall to your hearts content. Keep in mind that the firewall stuff in the sveasoft firmware is the normal stuff for a linux box (iptables if I remember correctly. Here's a link with some more info on iptables http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jns/security/iptables/ ). I would imagine you could make the router 100% stealthed this way no ports responding to anyone, although I haven't played with the firewall builder all that much. Also, there's a windows version of firewall builder out now too.

Anyway, I'll try and update the OP at some point soon.


Here's some answers to peoples questions that have been asked. Note that some of these have been answered, I just thought they were worth saying again.
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Just a note, I was unable to access two if my machines (wired) via remote desktop sharing or file sharing from my laptop (wireless) after upgrading to this firmware. Granted I don't know if I needed to enable something but after upgrading back to the linksys firmware, it worked fine.
I just did the exact same thing here, not 30 mins ago. It worked just fine. I had a wired desktop and a wireless lappie. The desktop had xp pro, laptop had xp home. I did remote desktop access into the pro desktop. Sat down at the laptop, did remote desktop, then ran photoshop on the desktop and printed off some stuff. Worked like a charm. Make sure to reset the router to defaults after upgrading firmware. Its also worth doing a uber reset by holding down the reset button on the back for 30 secs.
Originally posted by: Bob151
Interesting....If they can do PIX-like ACLs and sub-interface and VLAN switch port assignment, oh, now that would be awesome... A real layer 3 DMZ for $60!
I dont know about ACL, what that is, but I know the switch chip in there can do some sorta VLAN. I have links earlier in the thread about checking out how to do it.
Originally posted by: ramy
Does anyone have the WRT54GS and play Civilization 3? I can't get the router to allow me to host a game or even join a game no matter what ports I have open. I even put the computer I was playing on, into the DMZ and still could not play. I have to plug the cable modem directly into the computer to get it to work.
Make sure you are doing the proper ports forwarded to the proper IP, and if its udp or tcp or both. Also make sure you are patched up with civ3. I would imagine there's help on the civ3 support or forums about the proper ways to play behind a router.
Originally posted by: BG4533
Has anyone here tried the Static DHCP setting for the Satori 4 firmware? The DHCPd setting under admin is how you do this, correct? I keep trying this and it tells me my settings are invalid. Can someone please post an acceptable sample line? Thanks.
While I am at it, has anyone tried using the DNS Masq setting? Will this improve performance on a small home network (4-5 comps)?
Yes, I love static DHCP. One of my favorite features. Here's a sample line:
192.168.2.10 00:02:6C:2DB:C2 jungle
First is the IP you want it, second is the MAC address separated by : you can find the MAC in one of the status pages that shows what DHCP's are given out at the moment, and then finally the name of the computer on the network, again you can find this on one of the router status pages.
I dont know about the DNS Masq stuff sorry.
Originally posted by: BG4533
Overall, for ease of use and functions I actually use I think I like my old DLink 614+ better. First, static DHCP support was easier to use. Second, the 614+ supported port forwarding to different ports (i.e. port 3390 to 3389 of destination computer)
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
OK, here's one: I have 4 IP addresses from my ISP. On any of the Linksys routers I have tried so far, I can only use ONE of those, but can forward ports to different boxes. What I WANT to do is map the 3 remaining IP addresses to 3 INTERNAL servers (actually 2 servers and an XBox) so I can serve web content and whatnot behind the firewall but using the different IP addresses. I noticed that the Belkin Wireless G router CAN take the additional IP's and let me work with them (A buddy of mine has one that I configured), but i have yet to find another one that can do this.
With firewall builder now supporting windows and sveasoft, I'm certain you could configure these kinda things with firewall builder. It uses linux iptables and you can do pretty much anything you can imagine with that.
Here's a download link for the windows version: http://www.netcitadel.com/p/cat_fwb_gui_download.html
Originally posted by: atwnsw
Should I get the WRT54G or WRT54GS? Is there a difference other than speedbooster?
Not really. It is a bit faster CPU chip onboard and some additional memory (could be usefull for adding some packages into custom firmware if they get really big). The speedbooster thing isn't all that much faster btw. You are talking going from 30ish maximum megabit throughput on a G model to 40ish maximum megabit throughput on a gs model. There were some reviews that detailed this kinda tests. If you want details post and I'll dig up some links.
Originally posted by: CiSmAXz
Does anyone know of a good site that explains some of the settings on the Sveasoft firmware?
Yeah, there are some documentation links in the original post and posted by a few people in this thread. As well, sveasoft forums has some FAQ's sections that can help with some things.
Originally posted by: fastman
Does one have to use a Linksys NIC for this or will it work with any NIC?
Works with any NIC that is 802.11b or 802.11g compliant (and of course the speedboosted ones). Actually linksys in many of thier older models made crappy NICs and I'd steer clear of them. There are many that are better quality with more power and range. I'm not sure if thier current set of GS wireless NICs are any good. You might want to check for reviews.
Originally posted by: JJordan
Will this firmware increase range (newbie on this stuff). I cannot get a wireless router to go any distance through the lathe and plaster hard as concrete walls in my new (very old) house. DLink and SMC had no range - took them back. Have not tried Linksys or Netgear yet. I need to get through 4 walls and a floor, but only about 50 feet (cannot hardwire it).
Yes, you can increase the power of the transmitter and thus increase range. Keep in mind several things. a) the range is from TWO parts. One is the wireless router, the other is from the wireless card. Make sure you have a quality card with high power. Same with router. If you have a crappy older linksys card you will get crap range on it.
b) Antennas are important in trying to extend range. You can get custom antennas for both the cards and the router, or make your own. Theres a huge amount of info on the net about making your own from for example pringles cans and some stuff. Or you can just buy them from ebay or another place. Or even try the linksys range extender although those are more expensive than the routers.
c) immediatly below or above the router is the worst place to get a signal. If you are on a few floors above, this could very well be the reason. Try adjusting the antenna orientation, or maybe a wall mount.
Originally posted by: BG4533
Do you have to reset the router to defaults after you get locked out? How is QOS performance wise? I really want to use it because between my roomate and I something is always downloading from BT and it really kills our connection if BT isn't throttled back. Once QOS is properly set up does it still cause problems besides the loss of 10% of your bandwidth?
If you screw it up and lock yourself out, yeah reset to defaults. If you brick the router, even that might not help, but there are a number of ways to unbrick it. They range from trying to TFTP in the first few secs after a power on (a good reason to make sure to set in the configuration for a couple second boot wait when you power on), to opening it up and shorting a couple pins on the flash chip so it reports a corrupted memory to the cpu then it goes into emergency boot config waiting for TFTP.
Originally posted by: Seizure
Oops. I figured it out. I flashed the G version of the firmware. I have the GS router. All fixed now. Yay! Now, which firmware do I need to get that capture port feature, kind of like those internet cafe hot spots?
Thats added in the version 5.xx and 6.xx series of firmware. They are both currently in unstable testing releases. Its called a Captive Portal. I think sveasoft is using chillispot. I think there are some other alternative projects that have a captive portal if you must have it right now and cant wait for a stable public sveasoft version.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
so if i get this right, the qos lets you set priorities for types of data? does it work? would be nice if i could transfer stuff without destroying my ability to surf. damn 128kbs upload.
Correct. On many connections that are asyncronous, when you upload you totally kill your download rate. This is due to queues of packets and some complex stuff that you can google if you want to know about it. QOS allows you to set priorities so you can basically drop down from your max bandwidth 10% or so and then do mostly full speed downloads while you do nearly full speed uploads. And give priority to like HTTP web browsing so your transfers dont slow down web, and priority to VOIP or games etc. Many people use this for VOIP so they can do stuff on the internet while they talk on VOIP with like vonage without dropping packetc and getting a bad connection. As for details of using this, sorry I'm not currently using it (I'm waiting for the next sveasoft release to get into it since its going to be considerably more advanced in that), although the sveasoft forums have lots of posts by people who have gotten QOS to work.
 

Devistater

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2001
3,180
0
0
Ok its worth a new post to explain some stuff about all the open source and GPL stuff thats going on. There's been a lot of information posted, and much of it is either not correct or no longer current. Some people even claiming that sveasoft was trying to pass off other people's software as his own, etc. Lots of accusations being thrown around.


Ok first lets start with a little history. Linksys made the wrt54g router and some people noticed that it had signs of using GPL liscened software in it, yet they didn't have the GPL code for download. Some people contacted Linksys and started a dialog and Linksys did something way beyond the call of duty. They released the entire firmware source code AND included all the tools nessasary to build the firmware, and released the source in a buildable state. They didn't have to do this, they only actually had to release the GPL part of the firmware. So Linksys was great. This is the proper way to work with GPL issues, talk about it, start a dialog and arrive at a mutually acceptable solution thats within the GPL liscense.

Several people started taking a look at the open source firmware and figured out they could add features and stuff to it. There were at least a couple main projects that initially started. One was openWRT one was sveasoft, and there may have been one or two others. Initially a couple projects (not just sveasoft) didn't include the source code with the compiled binaries of the various test releases. This is a technical GPL violation, but sveasoft said he would release the source code at some later date. Well people started getting upset, and sometime around this time sveasoft started charging his $20. He also provided access to the source with the binaries for testing releases. You could still get some previous versions without paying the $20, a stable earlier release and some early testing releases.
Well he was again accused of violating the GPL by charging for software so he made it clear what your $20 was buying you. Your $20 was buying you support for the firmware. The actual testing "beta" firmware could be distributed freely if you wanted. HOWEVER, distributing it meant that your support was terminated, and that you basically were "forking" the development of the testing release, and agreeing to support all downloaders from then on yourself.
This is allowed by the GPL, since support contracts can be anything anyone wants if you are paying for support.
The Free Software Foundation said that paying for support was allowed as long as he was distributing the source code with the binaries. Thier response is here: http://www.sveasoft.com/module...2/viewtopic.php?t=2823

At some point sveasoft took off all access to the firmware and/or source while stating he was going to charge some whack number like $50 to downoad the source. This was a technical violation as well, but he never actually did it as far as I know, he went back to his $20 and still had the source and binaries for the releases.

Currently this is what his stance is on TESTING releases (not stable public releases)
Sveasoft Pre-release firmware source code additions will no longer be licensed under the GPL license. During pre-release development, source code additions developed at Sveasoft will be licensed for use by Sveasoft subscribers only. No distribution of this source code is authorized to non-subscribers.
All packages currently under the GPL license will naturally remain under this license.
All Sveasoft additions to GPL packages will remain GPL licensed.
All Sveasoft additions released publicly outside of specific GPL packages will be under the Apache license with the addition that they may never be released under a more restrictive license such as the GPL.
Basically what this means is that he is going to stick with GPL on the things that are already GPL. On things he is developing, that are separate packages made by him, and added onto the code, he is going to have the Apache liscense. This is allowed under the GPL. When you d/l linux, a lot of packages have a whole variety of liscenses. This link has a list of packages in the TESTING non stable firmware that are not under the GPL:
http://www.sveasoft.com/module...2/viewtopic.php?t=7964

Now as to specifics and whether or not every single one of those packages doesn't have existing GPL code in it, I dont know. If someone wants to dig up all the specifcs and examine every package feel free, and then let us know.

So basically he appears to be currently within the GPL. There have been some technical violations in the past which have been corrected. He includes links to the source with the binary downloads.

Currently:
The stable releases are all GPL and have no restrictions anywhere. D/l the source and firmware and distribute as you wish. Unfortunately sveasoft has made his forums (with the d/l link) subscriber only. But there are other places to d/l the firmware.
The unstable testing releases: You pay $20 for support for these then you can get into the subscriber forums and get download links.
His testing releases GPL code can be distributed freely but you agree to terminating the support contract if you paid the $20 for support, and that you essentially "fork" the release if you do so. You cannot freely redistribute the non-GPL portions of the testing releases. Now some people have posted links to his unstable testing releases. Just keep in mind that these are TESTING UNSTABLE releases. If you download them and you have problems, you cannot get support from sveasoft unless you have paid the $20. One of the most common issues I've noticed on the subscriber bug report sections is that PPPoE does not work with many of his later testing releases. I'm still essentially using version 4.0 public myself, I'm waiting for a stable working release with PPPoE since I use that on my SBC DSL. And PPPoE is pretty common.
Here's a link to the current public stable release on sveasoft if you are a subscriber:
http://www.sveasoft.com/module...BB2/viewtopic.php?t=19
If you are not you can get it from here:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/mod...op=viewdownload&cid=17
Technically the linksysinfo.org guys are commiting a GPL violation since they dont have the source with the binaries from what I can tell.

This is the correct history as best as I can recall, if there are corrections, feel free to post them, and feel free to comment on all this.
 

MedicBob

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2001
4,151
1
0
Devistator, That makes sense and "sounds" right.

Free bump as I am trying to convice the Mrs. to let me get one of these routers.
 

Penth

Senior member
Mar 9, 2004
933
0
0
I just got one of these routers yesterday after checking out this thread when it was first started. I figured all of the features that were 'coming soon' would be available by now. Any idea how much longer it will be?
 

luckysnafu

Senior member
Jul 11, 2003
546
0
71
WRT54G router is available at BestBuy this week for $66.49 with $30 in rebates = $36.49 plus tax on regular price. All 3 rebates are checks, NOT gift cards. Good through Jan 29th
 

Devistater

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2001
3,180
0
0
Originally posted by: Penth
I just got one of these routers yesterday after checking out this thread when it was first started. I figured all of the features that were 'coming soon' would be available by now. Any idea how much longer it will be?

Yes, read my post 3rd above yours.

Originally posted by: luckysnafu
WRT54G router is available at BestBuy this week for $66.49 with $30 in rebates = $36.49 plus tax on regular price. All 3 rebates are checks, NOT gift cards. Good through Jan 29th

Not a bad price, not a bad price at all.
 

Student Driver

Junior Member
Jan 31, 2005
1
0
0
I just got a WRT54GS yesterday, and got bridging (client mode) to work with my old WRT54G and XBox. Since I saw some posts here asking about it, I figured I would post some specifics:

1. Layout: Cable Modem --> WRT54GS <----> WRT54G (with Satori (Sveasoft, old version) 4.0 in client mode) --> XBox (in living room).

2. WRT54GS is in basic Gateway mode and using WEP128 (could not get WPA AES or TKIP to work, and since I can't upgrade the WRT54GS, more later, the stock firmware will not allow for WDS from what I can tell) and allows for connectivity between my WRT54G (with ONE connected device, namely my XBox) and other wireless devices, such as my laptop.

3. The WRT54G is set to client mode, with the "Associating AP IP" set to that of the GS. In addition, it is set to be a router (RIP2 in my case, with no other RIP configuration) and not a gateway, which is default.

As for upgrading the GS, it seems that even though the label reads that it's hardware version is at 1.1, the SysInfo.htm page (http://192.168.1.1/SysInfo.htm and yes it is case sensitive) reads that it's 2.0. A couple people on the Sveasoft forums are running into problems flashing these, so you might want to wait for a new rev of Alchemy (or Talisman) before trying to upgrade.
 

MunkeeBoy

Member
Dec 12, 2003
138
0
0
The details about the new Talisman firmware were just released on Sveasoft's site. Apparently, it is going to support the other routers built on the broadcom reference design such as the Belkin F5D7230-4 which was recently on sale for $10 after rebate at CompUSA. FYI, if you plan on getting one of the Belkin routers and putting Sveasoft on it, try to get one with a v11xx version number instead of a v14xx version number, as the older 11xx versions have 4MB of flash memory and 16mb ram, as opposed to the 2mb and 8mb on the newer versions. This means that the FULL version of the sveasoft can be applied to the older 11xx versions of the router, while the newer versions will only be able to load a stunted version of the firmware without any extra features. Here is the information from their site:
New Talisman Firmware PDF Print E-mail

The upcoming Talisman firmware will deliver unmatched functionality for wireless routers. Talisman will support routers from Linksys, Belkin, Buffalotech, and several more manufacturers and will come in a variety of firmware "flavors" each with a feature set for specific needs.

Talisman uses state-of-the-art compression to deliver the well-known Alchemy firmware features in 2/3 of the space. Talisman also sports a non-volatile read-write area in flash memory where programs, logs, configuration, or other data can be stored.

The following Talisman firmware flavors will be available:

Talisman - Basic

This firmware delivers the core Alchemy feature set together with a 1-5 MB read-write area of flash memory (dependent on the model's flash memory size). The goal is to enable customization via external programs downloaded to the read-write area. A remote file system tool using the highly secure SSH protocol will allow remote mounting of file systems to make the transfer and testing process a snap.

Talisman - Micro

The Micro build is for devices with 2 MB of flash memory. This enables a subset of the core Talisman features on router models such as the WAP54G. The Micro build does not include external protocol packages such as PPPoE, PPTP, or DHCP.

Talisman - VPN

The VPN build includes a PPTP and IPSec server in addition to the core feature sets. This version is designed for high-security installations where the router itself is a highly secure endpoint and gateway to the internal network.

Talisman - Hotspot

The Hotspot build includes the core feature set plus an on-board hotspot package and billing module, including an on-board RADIUS server and SQL server for user authorization and data storage. The hotspot package can also be used with external RADIUS servers where needed.

Talisman - Mesh

The mesh build includes a special mesh routing package that will auto-configure based on link strength and distance to Internet feeds. Based on the highly secure WPA security protocols, the mesh build will enable instant and secure WISP or neighborhood networks with little or no configuration. The mesh QoS features will allow management or blocking of all common protocols including P2P, VoIP, and IM.

Talisman - VoIP

The VoIP build includes a full SIP server including VoIP QoS, SIP NAT, and support for attached ATA or Wifi SIP devices. SIP calls are handled directly on the router itself or can be proxied to external SIP servers and providers.

Talisman - OEM

Contact oem@sveasoft.com for information on Talisman OEM builds with custom feature sets and your company logo and look-and-feel.
 

Netopia

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,793
4
81
WOW! That sounds cool!

Anyone know the memory on the WRT54g and WRT54gs? (ROM/RAM)

Joe
 

mdcrab

Platinum Member
Feb 9, 2001
2,105
0
0
Just purchased a WRT54G at BB today $69 - (2x$10) MIR's. It's a v2.2. I upgraded the firmware to the Linksys v3.03.6, but I can not figure out how to set up DHCP with static MAC->IP assignments. I am probably going to update the firmware to the Alchemy-6.0rc5a.

I have two questions.
1. Does the Linksys firmware allow you setup DHCP with static MAC->IP assignments? I can not find it anywhere. With my old Netgear MR814v2 this was simple to do.

2. If I backup my settings in Linksys v3.03.6, when I install the Alchemy-6.0rc5a firmware can I restore the old settings? (Not sure if they will map into the proper locations with the new firmware.)

mdcrab
 

TechFarmer

Member
May 1, 2001
39
0
76
Originally posted by: mdcrab
1. Does the Linksys firmware allow you setup DHCP with static MAC->IP assignments? I can not find it anywhere. With my old Netgear MR814v2 this was simple to do.

Not that I could find. D-Link has this feature but not Linksys go for thrid party firmware.

2. If I backup my settings in Linksys v3.03.6, when I install the Alchemy-6.0rc5a firmware can I restore the old settings? (Not sure if they will map into the proper locations with the new firmware.)

It may keep some of your old settings, but plan on re-entering everything.

 

Devistater

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2001
3,180
0
0
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
How safe and secure is this stuff over the normal firmware?

Safe and secure as in from outside hackers or from the firmware coding?
If you are talking about coding, its much more safe and secure since you can go through the entire firmware source code to make sure there's no back doors.
If you are talking about people trying to hack in from outside its also much more secure since you have 100% customizability of the firewall since it uses iptables. You should be able to make it 100% stealthed on all ports if you so desire. I'm not sure the default linksys firmware can do that.

Originally posted by: mdcrab
Just purchased a WRT54G at BB today $69 - (2x$10) MIR's. It's a v2.2. I upgraded the firmware to the Linksys v3.03.6, but I can not figure out how to set up DHCP with static MAC->IP assignments. I am probably going to update the firmware to the Alchemy-6.0rc5a.
I have two questions.
1. Does the Linksys firmware allow you setup DHCP with static MAC->IP assignments? I can not find it anywhere. With my old Netgear MR814v2 this was simple to do.
2. If I backup my settings in Linksys v3.03.6, when I install the Alchemy-6.0rc5a firmware can I restore the old settings? (Not sure if they will map into the proper locations with the new firmware.)
mdcrab
1) No, only the 3rd party ones. Along with a ton of other settings that are added.
2) Bad idea. Tons of problems people have with upgrading firmware is from not resetting to defaults. You are correct that they wont map properly and there's a ton of new options. The new firmware has tons of differant settings and a new set of factory defaults, so its probably best just to reset to defaults after you upgrade the firmware to a 3rd party one, or if you go from one version of the 3rd party stuff to another one.
 

Hankysmoo

Golden Member
May 27, 2000
1,848
0
0
Could someone tell me what the differences in versions of the WRT54G are? I bought my WRT54G about 3 months ago and it is still unopened. Should I try to get one of the newer ones? Thanks.
 

mdcrab

Platinum Member
Feb 9, 2001
2,105
0
0
Netgear vs Linksys

Now that I have used the Linksys and Sveasoft firmware for the WRT54G, I think the Netgear firmware is a lot simpler to use. Especially setting up static IP's for MAC addresses, checking on "Attached Devices", setting up port forwarding and other features as well.. Both the Linksys and Sveasoft f/w seem quite cumbersome in their operation and setup. Netgear has it all over Linksys for basic setup of routers. Linksys with the Sveasoft may have additional features, but they are difficult to use. May have to relegate my Linksys router to function as an AP and use my Netgear WGR614 as my main router.

mdrab
 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
Originally posted by: mdcrab
Netgear vs Linksys

Now that I have used the Linksys and Sveasoft firmware for the WRT54G, I think the Netgear firmware is a lot simpler to use. Especially setting up static IP's for MAC addresses, checking on "Attached Devices", setting up port forwarding and other features as well.. Both the Linksys and Sveasoft f/w seem quite cumbersome in their operation and setup. Netgear has it all over Linksys for basic setup of routers. Linksys with the Sveasoft may have additional features, but they are difficult to use. May have to relegate my Linksys router to function as an AP and use my Netgear WGR614 as my main router.

mdrab


I must agree, and D-Link (DI-624) firmware is even better and easier to use then the netgear (but netgear has better SPI feature - even logging of URLs). The Linksys firmware, both the stock and sveasoft web interfaces (which are based on the same code) are basically POS. For god's sake, you can't even see the currently connected clients, neither wired nor wireless.

The only good thing about this firmware is that it's open-source, so you could customize and change it to do practically anything (but you'd need to know how to do that, and for some things you'd need a cross compilation environment to be able to create a new firmware). But even the Sveasoft firmware already opens up a lot of possibilites, starting with the fact that you could telnet into the router and use unix commands to change settings, which gives you a lot more options than the web interface. Also the linksys is not one of the fastest among the 54g routers (but the DI-624 is). And btw, Mr Deviaster, even the 3rd party Sveasoft firmware does not support static DHCP, like most other routers do. So when you vaguely say this is supported by 3rd party firmware, make sure to mention which one has this feature. Because otherwise you just sound like some kind of salesperson which tries to throw in facts that are not completely accurate and just serve to add more confusion.
 

TechFarmer

Member
May 1, 2001
39
0
76
Originally posted by: user1234
And btw, Mr Deviaster, even the 3rd party Sveasoft firmware does not support static DHCP, like most other routers do. So when you vaguely say this is supported by 3rd party firmware, make sure to mention which one has this feature. Because otherwise you just sound like some kind of salesperson which tries to throw in facts that are not completely accurate and just serve to add more confusion.

Sveasoft firmware does support static DHCP and has for quite some time. I've been using it for static DHCP since around the time this thread started. However, it is more difficult to implement in Sveasoft than in D-link routers. You have to manually enter host name, MAC address, and the entire static IP address in a text box in one of the router configuration pages. I would prefer an implementation similar to D-link, where you select from current clients and simply assign the last three digits of the IP address (no MAC address or host name required) -- much more intuitive.

 

mdcrab

Platinum Member
Feb 9, 2001
2,105
0
0
Another very nice feature, which kept from going back to the Netgear router is the ability to increase the transmitter power. I am now able to get a "very good" connection to my son's computer on second floor from the basement. It was previously "low".

Does anyone know if increasing the transmitter power will have a decrease in the life of the router?

mdcrab
 

Devistater

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2001
3,180
0
0
Originally posted by: user1234
And btw, Mr Deviaster, even the 3rd party Sveasoft firmware does not support static DHCP, like most other routers do. So when you vaguely say this is supported by 3rd party firmware, make sure to mention which one has this feature. Because otherwise you just sound like some kind of salesperson which tries to throw in facts that are not completely accurate and just serve to add more confusion.
Incorrect, the sveasoft does support it. I'm using that feature this very minute on the computer I'm typing on. See the post someone made immediatly below yours. You can check out posts in sveasoft forums, or the online manuals for sveasoft to confirm if you wish.
If I didn't say specifically which firmware supports it in a post, it would be because I wanted people to make thier own choice about which 3rd party firmware they wanted to use. I'm not interested in "forcing" sveasoft on anyone. I dont make any commisions. My goal is for people to find and use the best solution for themselves, not just my idea of a solution for myself. Yes, this is a thread about sveasoft specifically, but I do realize that some people dont want to use sveasoft for one reason or another. Hence the reason why I provide links to several other 3rd party implementations. I dont know much about the others and thier features, but I'm reasonably certain that at least one of the others besides sveasoft supports static DHCP.
BTW, I always try to have up to date factual information. If you find something that I've posted thats not correct, feel free to mention it to me and I'll try and correct it. Without the name calling preferably
Originally posted by: mdcrab
Another very nice feature, which kept from going back to the Netgear router is the ability to increase the transmitter power. I am now able to get a "very good" connection to my son's computer on second floor from the basement. It was previously "low".
Does anyone know if increasing the transmitter power will have a decrease in the life of the router?
mdcrab
There have been debates on this issue which have never been really satisfactorily resolved. Usually the concensus was to not increase it to maximum possible for safety reasons. Some anecdotal reports of people with routers burning out at maximum, but again nothing 100%. Some people have even mentioned putting heatsinks on the transmitter chip to help keep it cool. So you could always open it up and see how hot the transmitter chip gets. And of course the maximum sveasoft supports may or may not be legal in your country. In USA, the FCC limits maximum broadcast power to a fairly small amount unless you have a ham radio liscense. I'm not sure of the exact amount, though I'm pretty sure the maximum 251mw in some versions of sveasoft is past it.

 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
I'm using Alchemy firmware, which as far as I know is the only one which is compatible with the WRT54G V2.2, which is the latest model, and the one you're likely to get if you buy now (please correct me if I'm wrong). Do you know if this firmware supports static DHCP and hot to set it up ?
 

Hankysmoo

Golden Member
May 27, 2000
1,848
0
0
Originally posted by: Hankysmoo
Could someone tell me what the differences in versions of the WRT54G are? I bought my WRT54G about 3 months ago and it is still unopened. Should I try to get one of the newer ones? Thanks.

anyone?
 

mdcrab

Platinum Member
Feb 9, 2001
2,105
0
0
Originally posted by: user1234
I'm using Alchemy firmware, which as far as I know is the only one which is compatible with the WRT54G V2.2, which is the latest model, and the one you're likely to get if you buy now (please correct me if I'm wrong). Do you know if this firmware supports static DHCP and hot to set it up ?

I don't think V2.2 is the latest, as I saw V3 in a store. I think it was either BB or CC.

mdcrab

 

mscdex0

Platinum Member
Apr 10, 2003
2,868
0
0
Originally posted by: mdcrab
Originally posted by: user1234
I'm using Alchemy firmware, which as far as I know is the only one which is compatible with the WRT54G V2.2, which is the latest model, and the one you're likely to get if you buy now (please correct me if I'm wrong). Do you know if this firmware supports static DHCP and hot to set it up ?

I don't think V2.2 is the latest, as I saw V3 in a store. I think it was either BB or CC.

mdcrab

Hmm, I just bought the WRT54G a week ago or so brand spankin' new at CC and it was 2.2. I look around at some of the firmwares i could find, but they either weren't compatible with 2.2 (sveasoft, at least afaik), or didn't even mention what versions it worked with.

Anyone know for sure what firmwares out there will work with 2.2? I'm curious about finding something that'll be better, easy to use, but with lots of settings/functions.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |