Free Pamela anderson DVD kentucky Fried cruelty

[The Raven]

Originally posted by: SRGilbert
Well, as much as I dislike vigilantes and eco-terrorist, I hate mis-information even more.

I'd rather someone give me some misinformation than terrorism (of any kind) anyday.

By the way, I could go without beef and chicken and pork and everything but you would have to let me eat some sliced fish on vinegared rice!

 

[Xyclone]

Originally posted by: tcsenter
In chronological order:

1. Pam gets silicon breast implants, which were approved only after decades of testing on thousands upon thousands of animals
2. Pam makes tens of millions of dollars using her heaving boobs
3. Pam gets her implants removed
4. Pam cares so much about animals that she wants to shame you into not supporting the harming of animals for frivolous reasons such as feeding millions of people (you know, compared to the far more important reason of making her filthy rich)

 

[DanDaMan315]

Well if it makes my Extra crispy chicken more expensive I say fvck you pam.

 

[MicroChrome]

Originally posted by: The Raven

Originally posted by: SRGilbert
Well, as much as I dislike vigilantes and eco-terrorist, I hate mis-information even more.

I'd rather someone give me some misinformation than terrorism (of any kind) anyday.

By the way, I could go without beef and chicken and pork and everything but you would have to let me eat some sliced fish on vinegared rice!

Well, keep listening to rush and bush... I would rather be informed thank you very much!

 

[0roo0roo]

hate animal rights nutters. they aren't fighting honestly for rational solutions since their real goals are extremist. i'll buy some kfc tomorrow.

 

[breweyez]

Originally posted by: MicroChrome

Originally posted by: The Raven

Originally posted by: SRGilbert
Well, as much as I dislike vigilantes and eco-terrorist, I hate mis-information even more.

I'd rather someone give me some misinformation than terrorism (of any kind) anyday.

By the way, I could go without beef and chicken and pork and everything but you would have to let me eat some sliced fish on vinegared rice!

Well, keep listening to rush and bush... I would rather be informed thank you very much!

wow...you found a way to take a shot at bush in this pam anderson chicken thread...congrats libtard:roll:

 

[meelo]

mmmmmmmmmm chicken..wait that's what i'm supposed to get out of this right?

 

[nuonce]

Originally posted by: Elixer

Originally posted by: mscdex0
darn, you have to actually work to get this one. here's one of the questions:

"What do you intend to do with the Pamela Anderson DVD? Please be specific and give as many details as possible. Please also include how many DVDs you could use, and what you would do with them."

Just request 1000 DVDs, so you can start your own chicken farm, and each employee will need a DVD to know what to do!
:shocked:

i did. hope these come soon so that i can decorate my christmas tree.

 

[popeye44]

Rights are ethical principles applicable only to beings capable of reason and choice. There is only one fundamental right: a man's right to his own life. To live successfully, man must use his rational faculty--which is exercised by choice. The choice to think can be negated only by the use of physical force. To survive and prosper, men must be free from the initiation of force by other men--free to use their own minds to guide their choices and actions. Rights protect men against the use of force by other men.



Animals do not survive by rational thought (nor by sign languages allegedly taught to them by psychologists). They survive through sensory-perceptual association and the pleasure-pain mechanism. They cannot reason. They cannot learn a code of ethics. A lion is not immoral for eating a zebra (or even for attacking a man). Predation is their natural and only means of survival; they do not have the capacity to learn any other.


Only man has the power, guided by a code of morality, to deal with other members of his own species by voluntary means: rational persuasion. To claim that man's use of animals is immoral is to claim that we have no right to our own lives and that we must sacrifice our welfare for the sake of creatures who cannot think or grasp the concept of morality. It is to elevate amoral animals to a moral level higher than ourselves--a flagrant contradiction. Of course, it is proper not to cause animals gratuitous suffering. But this is not the same as inventing a bill of rights for them--at our expense.

Quotes Taken from AynRand.org
I surely can't put it any better.

 

[MisterJackson]

does Tommy Lee bang her in this video?

 

[SgtSlaughter]

PETA

People
Eating
Tasty
Animals

These wack jobs, while started for the right reasons are completely over the edge. You can't deny our origins as a omnivore animal. Some eat meat, some don't. Get over it.

 

[gedman]

Originally posted by: SRGilbert

Originally posted by: gedman
Back when I was in college in the early 1990s, some of the radical animal rights folks blew up part of a college building. A professor there was studying ways to help minks survive in the wild. Of course, the research required her to keep caged minks that she used for her analysis and tests. The idiot animal rights folks blew up her lab and destroyed 10+ years of reseach on how to SAVE minks.

In addition to the bombing, the "terrorists" spray painted on the wall of the building "We're coming for the dolphins next". (The college, Michigan State University, had no dolphin research and is 700 miles from the nearest ocean.) Freakin' geniuses.

Well, as much as I dislike vigilantes and eco-terrorist, I hate mis-information even more.

While it may have been possible that the type of research you mention was going on, the primary target of that attack was a professor that was not only in the back pocket of the Mink Farmers Research Foundation, he also had been awarded federal grants to also use his mink farm for toxic experiments involving the forcefeeding of PCP?s, dioxins and other industrial pollutants to captive mink. This was no mink love-fest for sure.

Also, it was ?WE WILL BE BACK FOR THE OTTERS? not dolphins.

Again, please don't misconstrue this as support for these people, I will say that fur for the sake of fur is pretty stupid and wasteful.

I worked in the Engineering building immediately next door to the Anthony Hall bombing when the bombing occurred in February of 1992 (on a Friday night, if I recall). The spray paint said "dolphins" (not "otters") according to the reports the next day in The State News and the local papers. The "dolphin" vandalism was the butt of many jokes on campus regarding the intelligence (or lack thereof) of the bomber. If you claim otherwise, please cite a source. You can find The State News articles in the MSU Library.

The free PETA DVD is hot, but not as hot as 57 months of free room and board in Federal Prison (the sentence given to the MSU bomber, Rod Coronado).

 

[amicold]

Originally posted by: Solema
I disagree. A "free" flaming bag of sh!t on your doorstep is not a hot deal.

Touch the flaming bag, its hot.

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: cookj
Thanks .
I just finished off a plate or chicken wings

lmao

 

[Eureka]

Funny.... I'm about to have mid-dinner: KFC!

Norm

 

[TonitosWay]

From one chicken head to another.

 

[SignalSoldier]

Although being from the south and hearing what goes on in a chicken plant and having visited this site I can say that those actions are in fact wrong...however Ill be damned if this bitch can make me stay away from those blend of special herbs and spices

 

[RBC]

Quote: Originally posted by: SRGilbert
-------------------------
Back(way back) when i was a tech I did some work at a chicken plant . Now I had worked for years inside the 2nd largest oil refinery in the world,along with several other nasty places(prisons,ect).The chicken plant was hands down the worst place ever . Puke would get halfway up my throat before I could choke it down . The stink of dead birds and rotten eggs was enough to run me out of there . I had to burn my clothes and shower three times before I felt clean . And about 200 people work there 365 days a year . Still eat chicken .

------------------

I'd sure like to know where that was because I've been in maybe a dozen US plants along with ones in China, Australia, Thailand, and Egypt. None have been even close to what you are describing. All have been clean, relatively efficient processors that need to operate correctly to protect the rather huge investments they have in place. I'll admit I wouldn't want to work in one for very long, however I have never seen anything at the level that PETA describes it. I do believe that the bad guys are out there and that incidents may occur at the best of them too, but I don't believe that it is the norm. You could never run a business like that for the long term on such low standards.

 

[IEC]

Originally posted by: breweyez
hey ......lets turn this into a wacko liberal slugfest :roll:

Environmentalism is not a partisan issue... hell, Nixon was the one who passed the Clean Air Act (FCAA).

 

[TheyCallMeMrWoolf]

5 (add-on to tscenter). Pam realizes that folks care nothing for her without implants, so doubles up (so to speak). Wonder how the new ones were tested?

 

[Conky]

I ordered a free copy. I will use it as a plate for when I eat KFC chicken.

Besides a free DVD case is a free DVD case!

Thanks jokersmoker!

 

[thelung4]

Originally posted by: popeye44
Rights are ethical principles applicable only to beings capable of reason and choice. There is only one fundamental right: a man's right to his own life. To live successfully, man must use his rational faculty--which is exercised by choice. The choice to think can be negated only by the use of physical force. To survive and prosper, men must be free from the initiation of force by other men--free to use their own minds to guide their choices and actions. Rights protect men against the use of force by other men.

Animals do not survive by rational thought (nor by sign languages allegedly taught to them by psychologists). They survive through sensory-perceptual association and the pleasure-pain mechanism. They cannot reason. They cannot learn a code of ethics. A lion is not immoral for eating a zebra (or even for attacking a man). Predation is their natural and only means of survival; they do not have the capacity to learn any other.

Only man has the power, guided by a code of morality, to deal with other members of his own species by voluntary means: rational persuasion. To claim that man's use of animals is immoral is to claim that we have no right to our own lives and that we must sacrifice our welfare for the sake of creatures who cannot think or grasp the concept of morality. It is to elevate amoral animals to a moral level higher than ourselves--a flagrant contradiction. Of course, it is proper not to cause animals gratuitous suffering. But this is not the same as inventing a bill of rights for them--at our expense.

Quotes Taken from AynRand.org
I surely can't put it any better.

First of all, I'm not a big fan of PETA (even though they keep mailing my wife nickels as part of a fund raising drive) and I'm not a vegetarian, or a traditional "liberal" for that matter. I just hate when people use bad arguments to justify their behavior. So here are some comments:
1) Infants and the severely mentally handicapped are less capable of moral reasoning and choice than many non-human animals, yet we afford them ethical protection. This is often described as speciesism. For that matter, many adults are capably of only a very simplistic sort of moral reasoning ("you scratch my back..." or "it's the law").
2) I've heard that Rand's goal was NOT to illustrate what humans ARE, but rather what they ought to be. If a degree in psychology has taught me anything, it's that people vary dramatically in their ability to reason and choose, and often rely on mental shortcuts rather than rational deliberation. A large proportion of our behavior is largely determined by the same mental processes that govern the behavior of many non-human animals.
3) Some primate researchers would strongly disagree with the claim that animals cannot reason and that they "survive through sensory-perceptual association and the pleasure-pain mechanism" (i.e., classical and operant conditioning). Look at the work of Gestalt psychologist Wolfgang Kohler on insight in chimps (http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Kohler/today.htm).

The hot deal here is my 2 cents--free

 

[cvstrat]

Going to order some wings and sit back and watch the dvd!!!!

 

[SRGilbert]

Originally posted by: gedman

Originally posted by: SRGilbert

Originally posted by: gedman
Back when I was in college in the early 1990s, some of the radical animal rights folks blew up part of a college building. A professor there was studying ways to help minks survive in the wild. Of course, the research required her to keep caged minks that she used for her analysis and tests. The idiot animal rights folks blew up her lab and destroyed 10+ years of reseach on how to SAVE minks.

In addition to the bombing, the "terrorists" spray painted on the wall of the building "We're coming for the dolphins next". (The college, Michigan State University, had no dolphin research and is 700 miles from the nearest ocean.) Freakin' geniuses.

Well, as much as I dislike vigilantes and eco-terrorist, I hate mis-information even more.

While it may have been possible that the type of research you mention was going on, the primary target of that attack was a professor that was not only in the back pocket of the Mink Farmers Research Foundation, he also had been awarded federal grants to also use his mink farm for toxic experiments involving the forcefeeding of PCP?s, dioxins and other industrial pollutants to captive mink. This was no mink love-fest for sure.

Also, it was ?WE WILL BE BACK FOR THE OTTERS? not dolphins.

Again, please don't misconstrue this as support for these people, I will say that fur for the sake of fur is pretty stupid and wasteful.

I worked in the Engineering building immediately next door to the Anthony Hall bombing when the bombing occurred in February of 1992 (on a Friday night, if I recall). The spray paint said "dolphins" (not "otters") according to the reports the next day in The State News and the local papers. The "dolphin" vandalism was the butt of many jokes on campus regarding the intelligence (or lack thereof) of the bomber. If you claim otherwise, please cite a source. You can find The State News articles in the MSU Library.

The free PETA DVD is hot, but not as hot as 57 months of free room and board in Federal Prison (the sentence given to the MSU bomber, Rod Coronado).

That's a great idea, in fact, I did just that. (One of the many benefits of having a wife that works at MSU.) Here is a shot of the article as it appeared LINK as well as a close of of the otters reference here. LINK

Sorry for the poor quality, but these are scans from a print from microfilm! On the microfilm machine, you can clearly read the graffiti on the wall. Hope that clears a few things up.

 

[gabemcg]

I always love filling out funny answeres to the optional questions they ask?


Q: What do you intend to do with the Pamela Anderson DVD? Please be specific and give as many details as possible. Please also include how many DVDs you could use, and what you would do with them.

A. Probably masturbate and/or puke... wait, you want more details? Umm... well, I'll put the dvd in my dvd player, and press play. I will then proceed to sit on the couch, and touch myself whenever Pamela Anderson is on screen. As this apperars to be a PETA video, I will be extra carefull too look away whenever there are gorey shots of nasty sh!t... Hopefully there is enough Pam T&A to get me to climax... If not, I'll probably find the hottest shot of her, press pause, and finish myself off...

Then I'll go eat some KFC....