Originally posted by: InSuboRdiNaTioN
Update today from Mark Brown:
Thanks everyone. I know you're all anxious to get your hands on these products. Please be patient. We're working hard processing the W9's and picking/packing/labeling the products to go out early this next week.
He also says:
?btw I just confirmed with my team that we are only shipping the 32 bit version of Vista.
Bummer. Looks like I'll have to sell my copy so I can buy the 64bit version. Or perhaps they will let us upgrade for a price.
Yes, I agree.
I certainly try not to look any gift horse in the mouth, so I am
in no uncertain terms grateful that I'll be getting an x32 VISTA license.
From an overall technology perspective, though, it seemed like the main potential
benefits of VISTA could / should have been:
a) Windows File system -- but this was scrapped and never made it to market.
b) True seamless 64bit and 32 bit backward compatible computing for the masses.
c) DirectX10 (though honestly this SHOULD also have been made available for XP)
d) Ubiquitous multi media / media center integration -- this didn't happen either.
As it is WFS is not going to happen.
64 bit mode seems like it's got so many software, hardware, and usability compatibility
problems that I sort of doubt that most people even with 64 bit CPUs will be able to use
this effectively for at least 2 years so overall there's no real standardization or usability
benefit of the design relative to the XP X64 incompatible / non-integrated fiasco present
situation. Games and many software installers won't run under VISTA 64. Many
drivers for printers, scanners, older video cards and other hardware won't either.
Enforced DRM "shove it down your throat whether you like it or not" X64
driver signing just makes it more unreliable, more expensive, more incompatible for
everyone, and a lot harder for the software and hardware developers. The only good
thing about X64 is being able to have more than 3GB of memory.
DX10 has/had some promise to be a bit better than DX9, but considering the
ridiculous "shoot everyone in the foot" DRM fiasco with VISTA, especially how it relates
to video hardware, HDCP, HDMI, PVP, etc., it's a total mess and it seems like it's
being very difficult for video card OEMs to even get *working* DX10 drivers out that
are half as good as the DX9 present ones. NVIDIA's top of the line card has been out
for 3 months and VISTA business / enterprise has been out for 2 months and they
have yet to have even the first released VISTA driver for it or any of the previous BETAs.
Media center ought to have been included in every VISTA version, but as it is it'll
only be in Home Pro & Ultimate while the normal Home version and Business version
won't have it. Frankly it's not all that good either in the sense that there are plenty of
freeware or inexpensive PVR / TV / HDTV / DVD player programs that are just as good
as Microsoft's Media Center at a lot lower price than VISTA HOME PRO would be.
Given all that mess plus the usual "pre-SP2" product instability, it's tough to find a
financial cost / benefit or technical features / performance reason to choose VISTA
over XP HOME, XP MCE, or XP PRO / PRO64.
Anytime upgrade COULD have been somewhat of a decent feature but they messed
that up royally -- go out and buy an RETAIL box version of VISTA, and you can
install it / use it legally on any PC you want, changing your hardware and upgrading
to a new system as often as you want, and you can sell it and the new owner gets to
use it on any system they want too.
BUT let's say you want the very best, you start with unrestricted VISTA HOME retail, but
you ANYTIME UPGRADE that to VISTA ULTIMATE -- and -- whoops! All of a sudden
your "ULTIMATE" VISTA is now no better than an OEM version -- you CANNOT transfer
it to a different PC or upgrade your PC substantially more than once or you lose the
VISTA ULTIMATE license you just paid for, it's done after one PC transfer, and, oops,
you lost your original VISTA HOME retail license too since that gets "used up" when you
upgraded to "ULTIMATE"! If you sell your ULTIMATE, well, it can only be transfered
between parties ONCE, and then the new owner is stuck using it on ONE PC and never
being able to transfer it to another PC either. Not a very ULTIMATE experience for
$400+ or cash. That's more like an ANYTIME DOWNGRADE not an ANYTIME UPGRADE!
Security? Maybe ever so slightly better, but really still not much of an improvement over
XP and the new DRM ware and NAG ware (UAC "I'm sorry, Dave, you're not authorized
to do that to your own PC, I can't let you do that, Dave. Dave, what are you doing?
Please don't do that Dave.....") is a total fiasco. If they cared about end user
security they'd have not crippled all the encryption, secure remote access, security
policies, etc. etc. on the HOME versions and would have included a MUCH better
firewall and virus scanning program and hooks for it into the filesystem and task
manager etc. more like SELINUX is on LINUX.
Oh well. I'll be happy to have OFFICE, and it'll be nice to be able to do some testing
and development under VISTA but it's sad to see that with so many "years in the making"
that VISTA ended up being so crippled and disappointing in the end.