- Oct 13, 2004
- 24,778
- 4
- 0
Originally posted by: K1052
I'm still waiting for the US to get off it's ass and construct dedicated high speed rail lines where they are warranted. The NY-DC-Boston corridor is of course the perfect place to start. All we have is the half-assed Acela service that can't run anywhere near top speeds for large parts of its run.
Amtrak could make a killing against the airlines in this area. It would probably end or at least significantly reduce the need for federal subsides.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
The East is probably the only place in the US where high speed rail would actually work well. Well, maybe Dallas>Houston or SF>LA. Distances between cities are just too great.
I wonder how much power the TGV consumes compared to the German Transrapid. I have been saying that Transrapid makes no sense whatsoever because high speed can already be obtained from traditional rail technologies, without the need to invest in expensive Magnetic-Levitated lines that can only be used by... Magnetic-Levitated trains.
Trains are something that the French really do right
This is true. They arrive *to the minute* that it shows you on the ticket.Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Trains are something that the French really do right
Originally posted by: loic2003
This is true. They arrive *to the minute* that it shows you on the ticket.Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Trains are something that the French really do right
As a side note, but not wanting this to turn political, I heared that to fund a maglev train that operated in a vacuum tunnel that stretched from the east to west coast of the US and could traverse it in less than 30 mins would have cost roughly the same as the iraq war has cost thus far. Makes you think.
Originally posted by: loic2003
This is true. They arrive *to the minute* that it shows you on the ticket.Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Trains are something that the French really do right
As a side note, but not wanting this to turn political, I heared that to fund a maglev train that operated in a vacuum tunnel that stretched from the east to west coast of the US and could traverse it in less than 30 mins would have cost roughly the same as the iraq war has cost thus far. Makes you think.
Originally posted by: Ipno
25000 hp @ 31,000 volts, yes but how many watts does it consume?
Originally posted by: Mark R
Originally posted by: Ipno
25000 hp @ 31,000 volts, yes but how many watts does it consume?
25,000 hp is about 20 MW. By comparison, a typical Eurostar train (186 mph) with 18 passenger carriages uses about 13 MW at full power.
LOL at how they had to overvolt it to get that speed.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: loic2003
This is true. They arrive *to the minute* that it shows you on the ticket.Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Trains are something that the French really do right
As a side note, but not wanting this to turn political, I heared that to fund a maglev train that operated in a vacuum tunnel that stretched from the east to west coast of the US and could traverse it in less than 30 mins would have cost roughly the same as the iraq war has cost thus far. Makes you think.
3000 miles in 30 minutes is 6000 mph.
Originally posted by: loic2003
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: loic2003
This is true. They arrive *to the minute* that it shows you on the ticket.Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Trains are something that the French really do right
As a side note, but not wanting this to turn political, I heared that to fund a maglev train that operated in a vacuum tunnel that stretched from the east to west coast of the US and could traverse it in less than 30 mins would have cost roughly the same as the iraq war has cost thus far. Makes you think.
3000 miles in 30 minutes is 6000 mph.
Yeah, check out railgun projectile speeds, then imagine subtracting air resistance from the equation. Of course, accelleration would have to be limited...
It's all pie in the sky and likely would cost a crap-load more than the initial speculation; it was simply a method of showing what the funds could have been spent on.
They probably calculated how much it would cost to build a mile of the track, then multiplied it by 1000.