PottedMeat
Lifer
- Apr 17, 2002
- 12,365
- 475
- 126
aww i thought the doj was going to nuke facebook off the face of the earthalleges hacking of university computer systems by iranian revolutionary guard
aww i thought the doj was going to nuke facebook off the face of the earthalleges hacking of university computer systems by iranian revolutionary guard
Great Iranians.
Luckily new NSA advisor John Bolton will recommend a sober measured response.
Iran was probably sweating it while the US invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and were set up two of their borders. I wonder if Iraq didn't devolve the way it did if they would have went after Iran too.We already have....
1500 troops in Jordan
5000 in Iraq
15,000 in Kuwait
7,000 in Bahrain
10,000 in Qatar
5,000 in UAE
200 in Oman
15,000 in Afghanistan
Why not go ahead and occupy Iran while we are at it. It's like a real life game of Risk!
Iran was probably sweating it while the US invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and were set up two of their borders. I wonder if Iraq didn't devolve the way it did if they would have went after Iran too.
Why do you think Iran wants a nuclear weapon so bad? Only way to make sure the US doesnt invade is if you have nuclear weapons.
It’s Iranians. Surprising.
I have my doubts that the American public is going to think war is an acceptable response. I think this is an attempt to get out of the nuclear deal.No, it is a bullshit narrative to initiate a war. Fucking John Bolton..... a psychotic warmonger as NSA chief.
Awwww. Do you think this might fuck up the Iran nuke deal? What a shame, and it's one of the few lasting legacies of the Obama administration.
You're making your typical mistake. It was Obama that enabled Iran to continue their nuclear program.Dude, letting Iran get nukes just because you don’t like Obama is really poor foreign policy.
You're making your typical mistake. It was Obama that enabled Iran to continue their nuclear program.
I thought you were just kidding when you said you actually think that the actions that Obama took has kept the Iranians from developing their weapons. You weren't joking. Good luck with that.My typical mistake?
Oh you mean using facts and evidence that conform to reality.
Still why do you guys want Iran to have nuclear weapons so bad? You’d have to be an imbecile.
I thought you were just kidding when you said you actually think that the actions that Obama took has kept the Iranians from developing their weapons. You weren't joking. Good luck with that.
You're making your typical mistake. It was Obama that enabled Iran to continue their nuclear program.
But seriously. What do you guys gain by ending the deal and letting Iran build nuclear weapons.
But seriously. What do you guys gain by ending the deal and letting Iran build nuclear weapons.
Bolton, a hawkish hard-line conservative who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under former President George W. Bush, has earned himself a reputation for advocating for aggressive foreign policy. Bolton's appointment was announced just two days after the 15th anniversary of the Iraq War, a conflict he played a vocal part in promoting. Defense experts worry the former diplomat could bring that same approach to the current administration.
"I think the message is pretty clear. Trump is throwing in the towel as to whatever extent he was considering diplomacy and is preparing for war," Stephen Miles, director of the Center for International Policy think tank's Win Without War coalition, told Newsweek.
Win Without War, which represents left-leaning foreign policy groups, was founded as the U.S. was preparing to go to war with Iraq in 2002. Nearly two decades later, Miles said he sees Bolton's nomination as part of "a war cabinet" the president is forming against Iran and North Korea.
Why do you think Iran wants a nuclear weapon so bad? Only way to make sure the US doesnt invade is if you have nuclear weapons.
lol. you are more retarded than a slime mold.
So what are these horrendous people being charged with? Stealing unreleased scripts of Game of Thrones and a bunch of academic articles. I am not making this up.
There’s no doubt that what was being done here by or on behalf of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard was and is illegal. Sure, it’s straight up theft. But it’s also absurd to the point of crazed lunacy to call it a $3.4 billion cyber theft scheme. For what was actually being done was hacking into academic email systems in order to gain free access to the university libraries. Yes, sure, naughty naughty and people shouldn’t do that at all. But the value of what was stolen ain’t, not possibly, $3.4 billion, the Department of Justice is playing with numbers to get to that.
More indications that these charges could just be a trumped up excuse to renege on the Iran deal:
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/03/the-iranian-cyberattack.html
http://www.continentaltelegraph.com...ctions-on-iranian-3-4-billion-hacking-scheme/