Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: zendari
They did give a reason.
The timber industry had complained for years that the rules were overly intrusive and could take years to complete.
Course, this woman is in the pocket of the envirowackos.
I'll try to make this simple for you, since you are apparently unable to read even the section of this article that you yourself have quoted.
There are three branches of government. The judiciary (that's what a judge is part of) is there to interpret laws passed by Congress (as, in this case, implemented by the Executive Branch, specifically BLM and the Forest Service).
The judge in this case followed the law as it was written. If she had allowed variances from the law as she deemed appropriate, it would (at least arguably) have constituted the dreaded "judicial activism." Enforcing the laws as they're written is what judges are for, at least if you ask President Bush and Tom DeLay.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: why can't this forum impose a "You must be THIS tall to post" rule?
that pretty much sums it up. nothing left to say i don't think...