In summer i got ISDN becouse ADSL was not available in my area. Now it is.
Now I can either abandon ISDN and get ADSL over an analog line, or get ADSL over ISDN and pay 3 pounds ($5) more per month. The main advantage of keeping ISDN is the 2 additional phone numbers it offers me.
In some old articles (2000) some people argued that ADSL over ISDN is problematic, while others said it was not. What is it?
If i go with the analog solution the telecom will provide me with an Alcatel Speed Touch Home ADSL modem, while if i go with ADSL over ISDN a Cisco 677i.
I was trying to find some reviews for the Cisco 677i but i couldn't.
Which solution should i choose?
Now I can either abandon ISDN and get ADSL over an analog line, or get ADSL over ISDN and pay 3 pounds ($5) more per month. The main advantage of keeping ISDN is the 2 additional phone numbers it offers me.
In some old articles (2000) some people argued that ADSL over ISDN is problematic, while others said it was not. What is it?
If i go with the analog solution the telecom will provide me with an Alcatel Speed Touch Home ADSL modem, while if i go with ADSL over ISDN a Cisco 677i.
I was trying to find some reviews for the Cisco 677i but i couldn't.
Which solution should i choose?